Addlink S70 1TB NVMe M.2 SSD review
G.Skill KM360 Keyboard Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
Alphacool EISBAER Ex BLACK LCS review
Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6 router review
Corsair HS60 PRO Surround Headset Review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X review
Team Group Cardea II NVMe 1 TB SSD Review
ASRock X570 Phantom Gaming ITX/TB3 review
Promo: URCDKey Autumn Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
AMD Radeon R9 390X Performance Numbers Surface
It is rumored that AMD is working hard on releasing the next high-end graphics cards, tagged as Radeon R9 390X (or 380X). Asian website Chiphell now has posted a couple of benchmarks in their forums 'showing' these graphics cards in terms of performance.
We think the result tagged as "Captain Jack" could be the Radeon R9 390X (we think) and not 380X, though that remains to be a VERY wild guess. Performance wise it is looking pretty good TBH, however the results should be taken with a HUGE massive grain of salt as there is no validity whatsoever of these results being the true thing let alone indicating what card it precisely is.
So look above, at Chiphell a user posted two charts, the first (upper) chart shows average performance from several gaming titles such as Assassins Creed: Unity, Dragon Age: Inquisition, Alien Isolation and Metro Last Light Redux. it is a horribel way of normalizing a chart, but hey at the very least it is indicative of something. As you can see, the games were tested across a wide range of graphics cards from NVIDIA and AMD at 2560×1440 resolution with IQ settings set to maximum. The test setup includes a Intel Core i7-4790 clocked at 3.60 GHz and the drivers used were 344.75 WHQL for NVIDIA cards and Catalyst 14.11.1 BETA for AMD cards.
The second chart as shown above shows relative load (stress) power consumption, at just undfer 200 Watts. Anyway, we post it as we see them, make of this whatever you want.
AMD Radeon 390 and 390X Specs and Benchmarks ? - 11/11/2014 09:57 AM
Interesting news, over at the ranking system of SiSoft Sandra new entries have been spotted of what seem to be GPUs that we don't know of. And the specs are pretty appealing. Let's call the two entr...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Launches September 2nd - 08/22/2014 08:00 AM
AMD has kept the wraps on this one tight, however a document shows that the Tonga based Radeon R9 285 will be released onb the 2nd September, 2014. Tomorrow August 23rd AMD is celebrating 30 years o...
Review: AMD Radeon R7 Series SSD - 08/20/2014 05:49 AM
We review the AMD Radeon R7 series SSD. Based on an Indilinx Barefoot 3 controller the product comes with the latest iteration of Toshiba NAND flash memory. The end result is an SSD that is very fast ...
Several AMD Radeon R9 285 Tonga based GPU cards Spotted - 08/11/2014 10:17 AM
It was rumored already that AMD is about to release a R9 285 based on the new Tonga GPU. Tonga will likely have the very rather similar shader processor count as one of the "Tahiti" GPUs ...
EK AMD Radeon R9 295X2 Water Blocks - 05/30/2014 08:11 AM
EK Water Blocks, Ljubljana-based premium liquid cooling gear manufacturer, is proud to introduce a new Full Cover water block for AMD flagship dual-processor graphics card Radeon R9 295X2, the only tr...
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10735
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 10735
Joined: 2014-07-21
#4967385 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:14 PM
Well at least performance wise it looks pretty neat. Yet I'd like to see the price for this performance, since it has to at least meet the 980 pricing to become attractive... if it's more than the 980 it's no big deal if it's faster, imho.
Yet again, I think the Titan2 might still beat it in terms of performance, if the rumored specs of it are true.
Well at least performance wise it looks pretty neat. Yet I'd like to see the price for this performance, since it has to at least meet the 980 pricing to become attractive... if it's more than the 980 it's no big deal if it's faster, imho.
Yet again, I think the Titan2 might still beat it in terms of performance, if the rumored specs of it are true.
mR Yellow
Senior Member
Posts: 1935
Joined: 2005-02-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1935
Joined: 2005-02-02
#4967386 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:14 PM
Woot Woot. I want this card.
Woot Woot. I want this card.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11764
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11764
Joined: 2008-08-28
#4967393 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:23 PM
Looks alright. Beating everything is what we expected. I just hope this isnt just a rumor due we dont know the real name of the card yet.
Looks alright. Beating everything is what we expected. I just hope this isnt just a rumor due we dont know the real name of the card yet.
Rich_Guy
Senior Member
Posts: 12264
Joined: 2003-05-11
Senior Member
Posts: 12264
Joined: 2003-05-11
#4967394 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:23 PM
Chiphell is usually on the money with leaks.
That aside, from what i've been reading its the 380x and not the 390x and that would kinda makes sense on the power consumption vs SP side of things.
Anyhow looks interesting.
Yeah, from a translation, its only the midrange 380X (supposedly).
Chiphell is usually on the money with leaks.
That aside, from what i've been reading its the 380x and not the 390x and that would kinda makes sense on the power consumption vs SP side of things.
Anyhow looks interesting.
Yeah, from a translation, its only the midrange 380X (supposedly).
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2006-09-24
#4967399 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:28 PM
Now if true that brings AMD back in to the power / performance game pretty much perfectly. While being 14% faster in that then 980 and 22% faster then 290x. It would be decent bumb.
For some reason after recent power bill I would consider buying 980 or 380x
290x is a beast and a good card but yeah.
Now if true that brings AMD back in to the power / performance game pretty much perfectly. While being 14% faster in that then 980 and 22% faster then 290x. It would be decent bumb.
For some reason after recent power bill I would consider buying 980 or 380x
290x is a beast and a good card but yeah.
Veteran
Senior Member
Posts: 12105
Joined: 2009-01-16
Senior Member
Posts: 12105
Joined: 2009-01-16
#4967420 Posted on: 11/26/2014 03:56 PM
Well at least performance wise it looks pretty neat. Yet I'd like to see the price for this performance, since it has to at least meet the 980 pricing to become attractive... if it's more than the 980 it's no big deal if it's faster, imho.
Yet again, I think the Titan2 might still beat it in terms of performance, if the rumored specs of it are true.
The Titan II will run faster, have better performance and also run on less power, I guarantee it.
On a side note I got offered a 290x today for £150 from work colleague.....I said nar, ill wait.
Well at least performance wise it looks pretty neat. Yet I'd like to see the price for this performance, since it has to at least meet the 980 pricing to become attractive... if it's more than the 980 it's no big deal if it's faster, imho.
Yet again, I think the Titan2 might still beat it in terms of performance, if the rumored specs of it are true.
The Titan II will run faster, have better performance and also run on less power, I guarantee it.
On a side note I got offered a 290x today for £150 from work colleague.....I said nar, ill wait.
Juliuszek
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 2014-10-08
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Joined: 2014-10-08
#4967423 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:06 PM
I believe that those are excellent news for someone planning the purchase, for both teams. The sooner this card will be available the better.
I like ShadowPlay recording and G-Sync, and I hope that this new competition will decrease the prices of GTX980
I believe that those are excellent news for someone planning the purchase, for both teams. The sooner this card will be available the better.
I like ShadowPlay recording and G-Sync, and I hope that this new competition will decrease the prices of GTX980
zer0_c0ol
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Joined: 2007-04-12
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Joined: 2007-04-12
#4967425 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:08 PM
so it this a 380x sample or the 390x?
so it this a 380x sample or the 390x?
zer0_c0ol
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Joined: 2007-04-12
Senior Member
Posts: 2976
Joined: 2007-04-12
#4967426 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:10 PM
The Titan II will run faster, have better performance and also run on less power, I guarantee it.
On a side note I got offered a 290x today for £150 from work colleague.....I said nar, ill wait.
uhm comparing titan 2 to this..why?
i can also say that the 395x will eat titan 2 for lunch.. i guarantee it
The Titan II will run faster, have better performance and also run on less power, I guarantee it.
On a side note I got offered a 290x today for £150 from work colleague.....I said nar, ill wait.
uhm comparing titan 2 to this..why?
i can also say that the 395x will eat titan 2 for lunch.. i guarantee it
Anarion
Senior Member
Posts: 13517
Joined: 2005-08-13
Senior Member
Posts: 13517
Joined: 2005-08-13
#4967431 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:17 PM
I was hoping more (unless this is the midrange part)... However, if they price is competitively, this could be nice.
I was hoping more (unless this is the midrange part)... However, if they price is competitively, this could be nice.
Prince Valiant
Senior Member
Posts: 689
Joined: 2014-02-23
Senior Member
Posts: 689
Joined: 2014-02-23
#4967434 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:20 PM
Depending on price I think I might sell off my 780 and grab one.
Depending on price I think I might sell off my 780 and grab one.
Valagard
Senior Member
Posts: 1181
Joined: 2005-03-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1181
Joined: 2005-03-11
#4967450 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:37 PM
Believe it when I see it, got fed the same stuff with Bulldozer etc
Believe it when I see it, got fed the same stuff with Bulldozer etc
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4427
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4427
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4967451 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:38 PM
I always take these results with a grain of salt. If they're true, then awesome - I look forward to its release. Also, that would mean I'm glad I didn't buy a R9 285, because that means GCN 1.2 has already been obsoleted. I'm sure a handful of the 300 series will be GCN 1.2 based, maybe even 1.1. But if these results are true, they're a little too good for the tested GPU to not be a GCN 1.3.
I really hope AMD fixes this mix'n'match thing they've got going on. If they're going to continue it, I would hope all R9 GPUs would be either GCN 1.2 or 1.3, and I then R7 would be GCN 1.1 or 1.2. But I'm sure that won't happen.
I always take these results with a grain of salt. If they're true, then awesome - I look forward to its release. Also, that would mean I'm glad I didn't buy a R9 285, because that means GCN 1.2 has already been obsoleted. I'm sure a handful of the 300 series will be GCN 1.2 based, maybe even 1.1. But if these results are true, they're a little too good for the tested GPU to not be a GCN 1.3.
I really hope AMD fixes this mix'n'match thing they've got going on. If they're going to continue it, I would hope all R9 GPUs would be either GCN 1.2 or 1.3, and I then R7 would be GCN 1.1 or 1.2. But I'm sure that won't happen.
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 6770
Joined: 2006-09-24
#4967457 Posted on: 11/26/2014 04:41 PM
If it is only midrange it would be phenomenal tbh.
Yeah, from a translation, its only the midrange 380X (supposedly).
If it is only midrange it would be phenomenal tbh.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 603
Joined: 2007-09-07
Chiphell is usually on the money with leaks.
That aside, from what i've been reading its the 380x and not the 390x and that would kinda makes sense on the power consumption vs SP side of things.
Anyhow looks interesting.