Fractal Design Torrent Black RGB TG review
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Corsair H150i Elite LCD review
Seasonic Syncro Q704 chassis + Connect PSU review
Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 860W PSU Review
Crucial P5 Plus PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Fractal Design Lumen S28 RGB review (LCS)
WD Red SN500 NVMe SSD review
Core i9 12900K processor review
Core i5 12600K processor review
AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support
So if you had a peek about all & everything presented in the past few days, one thing you will have noticed. The new architecture doesn't seem to offer support for HDMI 2.0, but instead still uses HDMI 1.4a. This means with Fury GPU based products, like the new project Quantum for example which really is a small form factor PC, you can't fully use it on an Ultra HD TV.
See, HDMI offer bandwidth support for 60hz, on 1.4a it'll drop back to a measly 30 Hz. A big miss if you ask me, HDMI 2.0 is the answer for products in the living room. Especially Nano and Project Quantum in mind, this might not have been the smartest move from the engineering team within AMD.
It's a bit of a thing for 4K gaming in the living room I'd say.
This question was answered by AMD Matt from our forums:
Q: Does the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X GPU have HDMI 2.0?
A: No. AMD recommends and uses DisplayPort 1.2a for 4K60 content.
AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL - 06/10/2015 05:47 PM
So the funny thing about people as that once they have hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark are inserted into a database, which is publicly available. AMD Rad...
AMD Radeon Graphics Channel Roadmap Surfaces - 06/10/2015 08:17 AM
Nothing is safe on the web it seems. A new roadmap leaked onto the web showing AMD's Radeon lineup for 2015. It is as discussed many times now, exactly what we told for a while now. Lots of respins a...
AMD Radeon R9 370 Reference Design Pictured - 06/09/2015 04:01 PM
Over at Alienware they are showing a photo of what seems to be the Radeon R9 370. The reference product has had a bit of a redesign alright. ...
AMD Radeon 300 Series Pricing Revealed - 06/09/2015 08:23 AM
The pricing for the AMD Radeon 300 Series pricing leaked onto the web, from Radeon R7 370 to R9 390 that is. ...
AMD Radeon R9 390, R9 380, R9 370 and R9 360 Series Rebrands - 05/26/2015 06:03 PM
We discussed this a couple of times already, but as we near Computex things are getting more and more clear about AMD's Radeon line-up. Yes there will be a new product with HBM memory, but it's not ...
StarvinMarvinDK
Senior Member
Posts: 1362
Joined: 2004-12-19
Senior Member
Posts: 1362
Joined: 2004-12-19
#5099516 Posted on: 06/18/2015 10:37 AM
STILL getting more and more happy with my 980Ti
STILL getting more and more happy with my 980Ti
nohdmi2
Senior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2015-06-18
Senior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2015-06-18
#5099517 Posted on: 06/18/2015 10:38 AM
it's False
NVIDIA make Trick bandwidth is 10.2 GBPS built like HDMI 1.4
if thay have HDMI 2.0 :
Where's color profile DCI-P3 COLOER ?
Where's is HDR ?
NVIDIA Can not bring them because bandwidth only 10.2 GBPS and not 18gbps as requires the Standard HDMI 2.0
the tv do upsacle to 60hz
i have X290 i have only 30HZ 4K
but the tv make upsacle to 60hz .
processing information in bandwidth HDMI 2.0 with 18GBps you need 1.8 times the Power be able to receive it .
well done AMD dont MAKE crap !
amd have more Power from gtx960 and were not willing to lie to customers to make forgery HDMI 2.0
I HAVE the right info
nvidia not have hdmi 2.0 .
the programs do not verify bandwidth
the programs do not verify Standard HDMI 2.0
the programs built on Standard HDMI 1.4 10.2 GBPS AND rec 709
you can't buy dongle dp1.2 to hdmi 2.0
Because there is no such thing
dp1.2 work on 300 MHz AND HDMI 2.0 WORK on 600MHZ
dongle Will reduce the tension and you get to 300MHZ bandwidth like HDMI 1.4 10.2 GBPS
Even the gtx960 is Hdmi 2.0
it's False
NVIDIA make Trick bandwidth is 10.2 GBPS built like HDMI 1.4
if thay have HDMI 2.0 :
Where's color profile DCI-P3 COLOER ?
Where's is HDR ?
NVIDIA Can not bring them because bandwidth only 10.2 GBPS and not 18gbps as requires the Standard HDMI 2.0
the tv do upsacle to 60hz
i have X290 i have only 30HZ 4K
but the tv make upsacle to 60hz .
processing information in bandwidth HDMI 2.0 with 18GBps you need 1.8 times the Power be able to receive it .
well done AMD dont MAKE crap !
amd have more Power from gtx960 and were not willing to lie to customers to make forgery HDMI 2.0
about power and bandwith you haven't get the right info...
I HAVE the right info
nvidia not have hdmi 2.0 .
the programs do not verify bandwidth
the programs do not verify Standard HDMI 2.0
the programs built on Standard HDMI 1.4 10.2 GBPS AND rec 709
Buy a dongle and win?
you can't buy dongle dp1.2 to hdmi 2.0
Because there is no such thing
dp1.2 work on 300 MHz AND HDMI 2.0 WORK on 600MHZ
dongle Will reduce the tension and you get to 300MHZ bandwidth like HDMI 1.4 10.2 GBPS
0blivious
Senior Member
Posts: 3143
Joined: 2006-04-25
Senior Member
Posts: 3143
Joined: 2006-04-25
#5099520 Posted on: 06/18/2015 10:51 AM
the right question which video card have True HDMI 2.0?
Only one problem, no graphics cards with HDMI 2.0 in 2015
AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support
everything is cheating, false and fake test in nvidia
not support hdmi 2.0
not support 18 gbps
to processing 18GBPS you need 1.8 times power
NVIDIA has sold tens of thousands to customers promised video cards with HDMI 2.0
It's a lie!
not have hdmi 2.0
NVIDIA
not Supports DCI-P3 because they do not have enough bandwidth only 10.2 gbps like hdmi 1.4
not support HDR because they do not have enough bandwidth only 10.2 gbps like hdmi 1.4
some people brought as testing like NVIDIA supports HDMI 2.0 this is wrong test
test does not test bandwidth .
That's odd because I'm connected to the nvidia GPU HDMI port on 3 of my PCs, all of which handle more than 30 FPS. Is it the full 2.0 spec? Who knows but it isn't limiting whatsoever for the average TV/monitor whereas this AMD HDMI port absolutely is (for an intended 4K gaming box).
For a gaming box that's to be used in the Living Room, this HDMI choice by AMD is strange.
the right question which video card have True HDMI 2.0?
Only one problem, no graphics cards with HDMI 2.0 in 2015
AMD Radeon Fury X doesn't have HDMI 2.0 support
everything is cheating, false and fake test in nvidia
not support hdmi 2.0
not support 18 gbps
to processing 18GBPS you need 1.8 times power
NVIDIA has sold tens of thousands to customers promised video cards with HDMI 2.0
It's a lie!
not have hdmi 2.0
NVIDIA
not Supports DCI-P3 because they do not have enough bandwidth only 10.2 gbps like hdmi 1.4
not support HDR because they do not have enough bandwidth only 10.2 gbps like hdmi 1.4
some people brought as testing like NVIDIA supports HDMI 2.0 this is wrong test
test does not test bandwidth .
That's odd because I'm connected to the nvidia GPU HDMI port on 3 of my PCs, all of which handle more than 30 FPS. Is it the full 2.0 spec? Who knows but it isn't limiting whatsoever for the average TV/monitor whereas this AMD HDMI port absolutely is (for an intended 4K gaming box).
For a gaming box that's to be used in the Living Room, this HDMI choice by AMD is strange.
kenoh
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 2012-08-17
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 2012-08-17
#5099521 Posted on: 06/18/2015 10:54 AM
I think I made the right decision in getting a GTX980ti. I have it overclocked to 1442MHz stable and 8GHz on the memory. "I could go higher" I can play GTA V maxed out with 2xMSAA and get a solid 60fps with an average temperature of 73°C in heavy traffic and 67°C in buildings at 35% fan speed. I got the ACX 2.0 SC edition. I made Newegg pay me back the shipping because I ordered rush shipping and it got here 3 days later, so they honored the refund . Basically I payed reference price
I think I made the right decision in getting a GTX980ti. I have it overclocked to 1442MHz stable and 8GHz on the memory. "I could go higher" I can play GTA V maxed out with 2xMSAA and get a solid 60fps with an average temperature of 73°C in heavy traffic and 67°C in buildings at 35% fan speed. I got the ACX 2.0 SC edition. I made Newegg pay me back the shipping because I ordered rush shipping and it got here 3 days later, so they honored the refund . Basically I payed reference price
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20
I seriously doubt they will be weak by any stretch of the imagination ... I have a GTX 780 that drives most games to the max on 1440p at above 45-50Hz and its a fairly old card at this moment.
If 700+ euro cards would be considered weak 1-2 years down the road then there would be little reason to buy one unless you were swimming in cash ... it would be much better to get a cheaper card and upgrade more often.
I take even DX10 base this way:
Now you may or may not be limited by GPU horsepower.
But as DX12 removes Draw Call bottleneck = You can throw much more on GPU without actually suffocating CPU.
And as a result we will see games with so many more object instances even this year.
Then add few more effects and 1440p will be max what can those card drive at reasonable fps. 4k will be out of question (which is discussion here: lack of HDMI2.0 to drive 4k@60Hz).
In time High settings may go back to 1 Top card released that year and Ultra may become again thing of SLI/CF or card released year after release.
We are both at quite old HW, me at 1080p screen, so I may have bit higher fps at same settings in comparison to your 1440p, but still in some games it is just sad.
(not having 50+ fps is sad, having 60+ fps is OK, 90+ fps is good, 120fps+ is golden)