Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review
MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT GAMING X TRIO review
Guru3D Q1 Winter 20/21 PC Buyer Guide

New Downloads
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5640 beta
CrystalDiskInfo 8.11.2 Download
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.3 driver download
GPU-Z Download v2.37.0
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH27.20.100.9313
HWiNFO Download v6.43 - 4380 Beta
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.2.2 driver download
3DMark Download v2.17.7137 + Time Spy


New Forum Topics
Meltdown and Specter patch performance hit tested on Optane and VROC. GeForce 461.72 WHQL drivers: download & discussion Any way to "Half-Refresh V-Sync" with AMD GPUs? Thanks! RTSS 6.7.0 beta 1 New Upcoming ATI/AMD GPU's Thread: Leaks, Hopes & Aftermarket GPU's Tesla shuts down Model 3 production line for two weeks due to chip shortage MOSFET prices to increase on worsening component shortages Judge orders Valve to hand over Steam data The AMD Ryzen All In One Tread /Overclocking/Memory Speeds & Timings/Tweaking/Cooling Part 2 Sony Preps New Firmware - PlayStation 5 Storage Can Be Upgraded in Summer




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL

AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/10/2015 04:47 PM | source: | 84 comment(s)
AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL

So the funny thing about people is that once they have cool hardware, they test stuff and sometimes forget that the results of a benchmark can be inserted into an online database, which is publicly available. AMD Radeon Fury (Fiji) just popped up in an OpenCL benchmark, confirming a number of things.

The leak shows that the HBM based Fiji XT aka Radeon Fury X slaps around the NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X, with a good margin as well. It is OpenCL though, compute stuff. And then again, the R9 280X is not be that far behind the Titan X either - so here you immediately see why we don't do OpenCL benchmarks in our benchmarks as they say very little.
 


The card shown as "AMD Radeon Graphics Processor" would be Fiji / Fury X. The Fury X drops the ball to the Titan X in a 'face detection' test on CompuBench, yet beats the Titan X once again in the 'TV-L1 Optical Flow' test. AMD Radeon Fury X scores 102FPS on the Manhattan benchmark found in GFXBench where Titan X it doing 137FPS. 
 

Now there is something else quite intersting you can extrapolate from these results, the GPGPU Info app registers how many compute units (CUs) a GPU has as well as the GPU codename hence we can verify this was the real thing.

  • Name: Fiji
  • max_clock_frequency 1000
  • max_compute_units 64

GFXBench shows a Compute Unit count of 64 multiply that with GCN architecture, thus per compute unit you will see 64 stream processors, and we now know the number of shader processors for Fiji, 64 shader processors x 64 CUs = 4096 shader processors.

It also is listing the maximum clock frequency at 1 GHz. If we chart things up it would look something like this:
 

  AMD Radeon Fiji AMD Radeon R9 390
Fabrication Process 28nm 28nm
GPU Fiji Hawaii renamed to Grenada
Streaming Processors 4096 2816
Graphics memory 4 GB HBM 8 GB GDDR5
Memory Clock up-to 500 MHz per stack (x4) 5.0 GHz
Core Clock > 1.00 GHz > 1.00 GHz
Memory Bandwidth >640 GB/s 320 GB/s
Power Connectors 1 x 6-pin - 1 x 8-pin 1 x 6-pin - 1 x 8-pin
Form Factor Full Height, Dual slot Full Height, Dual slot
Freesync  Yes Yes
DirectX 12 Support  Yes Yes


Can I just say one thing ? OpenCL Compubench means very little ... real games with real DX11/DX12 software is where the money shot is to be found of course. AMD Radeon Fury X and Radeon R9 390X will be unveiled next week at E3 2015.



AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL




« Battlefleet Gothic: Armada Screenshots · AMD Radeon Fury X beats Titan X in OpenCL · 3DMark Firemark Scores Radeon Fury X surfaces - but are they real ? »

Related Stories

AMD Radeon Graphics Channel Roadmap Surfaces - 06/10/2015 07:17 AM
Nothing is safe on the web it seems. A new roadmap leaked onto the web showing AMD's Radeon lineup for 2015. It is as discussed many times now, exactly what we told for a while now. Lots of respins a...

AMD Radeon R9 370 Reference Design Pictured - 06/09/2015 03:01 PM
Over at Alienware they are showing a photo of what seems to be the Radeon R9 370. The reference product has had a bit of a redesign alright. ...

AMD Radeon 300 Series Pricing Revealed - 06/09/2015 07:23 AM
The pricing for the AMD Radeon 300 Series pricing leaked onto the web, from Radeon R7 370 to R9 390 that is. ...

AMD Radeon R9 390, R9 380, R9 370 and R9 360 Series Rebrands - 05/26/2015 05:03 PM
We discussed this a couple of times already, but as we near Computex things are getting more and more clear about AMD's Radeon line-up. Yes there will be a new product with HBM memory, but it's not ...

AMD Radeon R9 390X To Skip Computex - Launches at E3 - 05/13/2015 10:51 AM
With AMD sponsoring a PC Gaming event at E3, this kind of was to be expected. It seems now that the Radeon R9 390X will not show up next month in Taiwan's Computex. But rather will be revealed at E3...


17 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


mcfart
Senior Member



Posts: 303
Joined: 2010-05-07

#5093273 Posted on: 06/10/2015 04:21 PM
Not sure if this has been here before but just forwarding it.


Not believing anything until next week.


The most reasonable conclusion is a slight performance edge for Fury X, until the 4GB of RAM is allocated, in which case the Titan will rape it, so the Fury X will be sold at a lower MSRP then the Titan


I'm more interested in the Fury, since its competition has 6GB of RAM, so it's only -2GB to get a Fury instead of a 980ti. I'm sure dat 4096 bit memory bus will result in better performance (10% or so...I'm sure the GPU core clock bottlenecks it) then the 512 bit 980ti, and if it's a lower MSRP too...

SuperAverage
Senior Member



Posts: 247
Joined: 2015-01-15

#5093278 Posted on: 06/10/2015 04:26 PM
then the 512 bit 980ti, and if it's a lower MSRP too...


384 bit.

nhlkoho
Senior Member



Posts: 7746
Joined: 2005-12-06

#5093283 Posted on: 06/10/2015 04:30 PM
The article also says this.
When it comes to potential gaming performance, the Fury X scores 102FPS on the Manhattan benchmark found in GFXBench, with the Titan X beating it easily with 137FPS.


Its all speculation at this point though

moab600
Senior Member



Posts: 6267
Joined: 2004-09-30

#5093286 Posted on: 06/10/2015 04:32 PM
according to wcc the Fiji have very slight better score that titanx, means nothing atm. but i do believe 980ti and fiji are toe to toe, with fiji is better for 4K but still not enough.

Deathchild
Senior Member



Posts: 3970
Joined: 2005-08-22

#5093293 Posted on: 06/10/2015 04:38 PM
When is the Fury coming out anyways, getting so impatient waiting for it seriously... **** sake, how can they take this long lol.

17 pages 1 2 3 4 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021