Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC review
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review

New Downloads
GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70
FurMark Download v1.30
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960


New Forum Topics
MSI AB / RTSS development news thread NVIDIA GeForce 512.95 WHQL driver download & Discussion Has anyone ever had an issue where the PCIE Root ports are installed as PCI-PCI Bridges instead? AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.2 driver download and discussion Gigabyte Project Stealth Hides All Cables Inside Chassis Project Zero from MSI hides all connectors on motherboard Project Volterra: Microsoft announces Windows 11 on ARM When can we expect to see Microsoft DirectStorage in real games? A 500Hz refresh rate NVIDIA G-Sync compatible gaming LCD is in the works Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Noctua OC




Guru3D.com » News » AMD possibly will be using XX5 revisions e.g. AMD Radeon RX 495

AMD possibly will be using XX5 revisions e.g. AMD Radeon RX 495

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/01/2016 08:46 AM | source: | 52 comment(s)
AMD possibly will be using XX5 revisions e.g. AMD Radeon RX 495

AMD could be moving towards xx5 donominators say 480 and then later on a 485 for their graphics card series, indicating faster models compared to 0 suffix based models. The company also reaffirms the arrival of the Radeon RX 490 model.

These xx5 revisions may actually be released after the initial batches and this are released after the current line of available products, thus these would be updated GPUs with say optimizations on 14nm FinFET chips for higher clock speeds and lower consumption. While AMD hasn't confirmed this is the case it certainly is indicative. So inevitable you might see say a Radeon RX 485 with the 4 for Generation, the 8 is the tier and the 5 being the revision. Striking is the mention of the '9', which AMD again the arrival of the RX 490 card confirms indirectly.

Tier versus performance things wil look like this, and if you look closely at the slide you can see the xx5 shown under 'Revision':

 

  
Radeon RX  49X >256bit uhd, 2160p
  48X, 47X 256bit wqhd, 1440p
  46X, 45X 128bit fullhd, 1080p
Radeon 460X, 45X 128bit fullhd, 1080p
  44X 64bit -

 
You can also spot the Tier 9 in there indicating Radeon RX 490, it is listed with a 256-bit  wide (or higher) memory bus and tagged as a 4K capable graphics cards. AMD has not officially confirmed of the revisions, but pointed to the possibility of it with this slide.



AMD possibly will be using XX5 revisions e.g. AMD Radeon RX 495




« EK preps FC RX-480 water block · AMD possibly will be using XX5 revisions e.g. AMD Radeon RX 495 · Review: MSI GeForce GTX 1080 SEA HAWK X »

11 pages « < 8 9 10 11


Neo Cyrus
Senior Member



Posts: 10065
Joined: 2006-02-14

#5300282 Posted on: 07/03/2016 07:34 PM
So wait the RX 480 is targeting 1440p?!?!?!?? Okay AMD time to go home you're drunk.

It can get 15-20 fps at 1440p in most games I guess? It roughly matches a GTX 970, and that's what a 970 would get at 1440p in a modern game maxed.
And why wouldnt it? It runs perfectly 1440p@60... Why would everyone care about maxing games out. Too many elitists..

Is this a joke? You're on the wrong kind of forum to be calling people elitists over maxing details.

Loophole35
Senior Member



Posts: 9800
Joined: 2011-09-21

#5300363 Posted on: 07/04/2016 12:18 AM
It can get 15-20 fps at 1440p in most games I guess? It roughly matches a GTX 970, and that's what a 970 would get at 1440p in a modern game maxed.

Is this a joke? You're on the wrong kind of forum to be calling people elitists over maxing details.

Bro he is serious. Between him and vase I'm really not wanting to suggest this card to friends due to not wanting them to start acting like them.

Matt26LFC
Senior Member



Posts: 3101
Joined: 2008-01-06

#5300429 Posted on: 07/04/2016 06:52 AM
I totally agree with Loophole35 and Denial, I wouldn't buy this for my 1440p screen! I waited for this cards release before I made my purchase of a 1070, after I read the review I liked the card and its performance at its price point, but its certainly not for 1440p gaming with modern titles. 1080p gaming is its domain.

Stormyandcold
Senior Member



Posts: 5771
Joined: 2003-09-15

#5300435 Posted on: 07/04/2016 07:32 AM
Like Leszy's 2 pictures show; the RX 480 IS capable of 1440p gaming.

On the other-hand, I do think having a 1440p monitor and then buying the RX 480 to go with it is dumb. However, going crossfire RX 480, yeah, decent setup.

Matt26LFC
Senior Member



Posts: 3101
Joined: 2008-01-06

#5300437 Posted on: 07/04/2016 07:44 AM
Like Leszy's 2 pictures show; the RX 480 IS capable of 1440p gaming.

On the other-hand, I do think having a 1440p monitor and then buying the RX 480 to go with it is dumb. However, going crossfire RX 480, yeah, decent setup.

Those graphs don't tell me enough, what in game settings where used!? If you look at Fallout 4 it shows nearly 70FPS (DX11) and Hilberts graphs shows mid 50s, quite a bit of a difference there. Then theres Battlefield Hardline, the quoted graph shows nearly 80FPS at 1440p whereas Hilbert saw mid 40s I mean what!?

I guess theres no right or wrong here, if someones happy to game at 1440p and turn a lot of settings down to get 60FPS thats up to them, personally I don't want to make that compromise, so for me RX480 is nowheres near enough for 1440p, hence why I've got a 1070 arriving today.

11 pages « < 8 9 10 11


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022