Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - March 2021
Intel Core i9-11900K processor review
Intel Core i5-11600K processor review
ASUS ROG Maximus XIII HERO review
MSI MEG Z590 ACE review

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v7.02
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.1
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.9.350
Quake II RTX Download 1.5.0
GeForce 465.89 WHQL driver download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.33
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.2 driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.8
AMD Radeon Adrenalin Edition 21.3.1 driver WHQL download


New Forum Topics
AMD Radeon Software - UWP - v27.20.21001.7005 Game Ready Driver WHQL 465.89 download & discussion Study reveals Cryptocurrency mining energy consumption in China alone will be higher than Italy in three years Why can't Nvidia buy AMD if they are blocked from purchasing ARM? Gigabyte Starts Distributing New Ryzen 5000 Firmware Updates for B550 and X570 Kozary's Triple SLI Thread MSI Issues AGESA 1.2.0.2 BIOS Updates for MSI X570/B550 motherboards: fixes USB issues 3080 tuf OC ed. Same stutter in apex once/twice a game (w/frametimegraph) Intels Raja Koduri gives sneak peek at Xe-HPG (DG2) gaming GPU in 3DMark ASUS ROG Strix XG279Q-G GUNDAM EDITION Monitor




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Linux driver reveals preliminary PCI-Express 4.0 support

AMD Linux driver reveals preliminary PCI-Express 4.0 support

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 06/29/2018 02:52 PM | source: | 17 comment(s)
AMD Linux driver reveals preliminary PCI-Express 4.0 support

While the need for PCI-Express 4.0 seems a bit redundant and far-fetched for any near future graphics card it now looks like it that the 7nm Vega20 that was announced on Computex, might be PCIe 4.0 compatible. Which has been an ongoing rumor ever since the beginning. 

Earlier last year in October we already talked about Generation 4, the spec now is final. PCI-Express Gen 4.0 will offer 16 GT/s per PCI-Express lane which is double that of the 8 GT/s on the current PCI-Express Gen 3.0 specification. If you multiply 16 GT/s per lane bandwidth that translates into 1.97 GB/s for x1 devices, 7.87 GB/s for x4, 15.75 GB/s for x8, and 31.5 GB/s for x16 devices. The guys from Computerbase spotted an entry in the Linux AMD driver.

 

 

Contrary to say your SATA ports, PCI Express has moved well beyond the needs of any graphics cards. Currently, nearly every IO device routes data through PCIe to send signals back to the CPU and across the platform. It is expected to see rapid adoption of the new standard for storage and networking products (10 GBit/s links). NVMe SSDs using PCIe 3.0 x4, for example, reached the usable limit of the interface, ergo future NAND storage devices could benefit far better from this new standard. Meanwhile PCI-Express also already is in development at PCI-Sig, I added the numbers but that will take many years to see implemented.

 

PCIe VersionLine CodeTransfer Ratex1 Bandwidthx4x8x16
1.0 8b/10b 2.5 GT/s 250 MB/s 1 GB/s 2 GB/s 4 GB/s
2.0 8b/10b 5 GT/s 500 MB/s 2 GB/s 4 GB/s 8 GB/s
3.0 128b/130b 8 GT/s 984.6 MB/s 3.938 GB/s 7.877 GB/s 15.754 GB/s
4.0 128b/130b 16 GT/s 1.969 GB/s 7.877 GB/s 15.754 GB/s 31.508 GB/s
5.0 128b/130b 32 GT/s 3.938 GB/s 15.754 GB/s 31.508 GB/s 63.016 GB/s

 



AMD Linux driver reveals preliminary PCI-Express 4.0 support




« Guru3D Rig of the Month - June 2018 · AMD Linux driver reveals preliminary PCI-Express 4.0 support · Nvidia Possibly to Announce GeForce GTX 1100 series during Gamescom »

4 pages 1 2 3 4


BLEH!
Senior Member



Posts: 6067
Joined: 2010-10-17

#5561349 Posted on: 06/29/2018 02:41 PM
Are we even close to saturating PCIe 3.0 yet?

schmidtbag
Senior Member



Posts: 5741
Joined: 2012-11-10

#5561355 Posted on: 06/29/2018 02:49 PM
Are we even close to saturating PCIe 3.0 yet?

For current-gen AMD GPUs, probably not. But, I imagine Volta GPUs demand more bandwidth than 3.0 @ x8 can offer.

EDIT:
As far as I'm concerned, the real benefit of higher-bandwidth PCIe lanes comes down to everything that uses fewer than x4 lanes (like M.2, x1 slots, Thunderbolt, etc). We need more bandwidth there; at this point, we could probably ditch x16 slots because I'm not sure we're really ever going to see hardware (of the same generation) take advantage of those ever again.

Silva
Senior Member



Posts: 1433
Joined: 2013-06-04

#5561366 Posted on: 06/29/2018 03:19 PM
Are we even close to saturating PCIe 3.0 yet?

It's not only about saturating but efficiency too. Current SSD can already max PCIe3.0 4x for example.
Business needs this badly to improve performance. As for us consumers, CPUs have a limited number of lanes because they're expensive to make. So, if we need less lanes to power the same things, we get cheaper products or more feature rich products for the same price!
Currently some boards with 2 nvme slots have one running at 3.0 and the other at 2.0 through the chipset. An SSD connected through the chipset will have its performance degraded by half.

nosirrahx
Senior Member



Posts: 328
Joined: 2013-04-05

#5561367 Posted on: 06/29/2018 03:21 PM
For current-gen AMD GPUs, probably not. But, I imagine Volta GPUs demand more bandwidth than 3.0 @ x8 can offer.

EDIT:
As far as I'm concerned, the real benefit of higher-bandwidth PCIe lanes comes down to everything that uses fewer than x4 lanes (like M.2, x1 slots, Thunderbolt, etc). We need more bandwidth there; at this point, we could probably ditch x16 slots because I'm not sure we're really ever going to see hardware (of the same generation) take advantage of those ever again.

Gen 4 X 4 lanes could handle just about anything we need. It could allow for standard 4 X risers in cases to more conveniently mount GFX cards.

Evildead666
Senior Member



Posts: 1304
Joined: 2003-09-14

#5561369 Posted on: 06/29/2018 03:26 PM
Are we even close to saturating PCIe 3.0 yet?

Seeing as both the DMI interface on Intel, and the AMD equivalent, both use effectively PCIe 3.0 x4 interfaces, yes is the answer. :)
Having a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface between the CPU and the chipset will be a godsend to motherboard makers everywhere.

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2021