be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
AMD hints that ZEN-cpu is twice as fast as the FX-8350
The original content in this article was translated from the source Tweakers.net, after a complain we have removed this item. We do apologize.
AMD hints at standardization for external graphics cards - 03/01/2016 10:46 AM
Personally I feel it's kicking a dead horse as the idea has been done over and over again. However on it's facebook page Robert Hallock (chief technical marketing AMD) is making a case for a standa...
AMD hints at dual-GPU Radeon R9 Fury X2 graphics card (again) - 02/12/2016 07:16 PM
CeBIT is coming up next month, it might be possible timing wise. Anyway, on his Twitter account Scot over at AMD has posted holding a photo with two FIJI GPUs in his hand, that my friends would hint a...
vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 15139
Joined: 2006-07-04
Moderator
Posts: 15139
Joined: 2006-07-04
#5278991 Posted on: 05/25/2016 05:13 PM
apples to oranges. 6700k is 4c/8t, Zen is 8c/16t
True, but price point is where this is going to determine how successful Zen is. If an 8 core Zen costs the same or less than a 6700k, one would assume the Zen would be a hit.
If that's also meant for single core performance then it could be, what's current Fx8350 single core cinebench15 scenario? 2x, you get final score..
Edit, looked around and found this passmark
Passmark
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core (Orochi)
1,515
so around 2.7 if its not 100% scaling and that makes it faster then
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
2,529
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
2,329
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
If this is true, then yes it would be over Skylake even. But AMD has said that about Bulldozer over K10 as well.
apples to oranges. 6700k is 4c/8t, Zen is 8c/16t
True, but price point is where this is going to determine how successful Zen is. If an 8 core Zen costs the same or less than a 6700k, one would assume the Zen would be a hit.
If that's also meant for single core performance then it could be, what's current Fx8350 single core cinebench15 scenario? 2x, you get final score..
Edit, looked around and found this passmark
Passmark
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core (Orochi)
1,515
so around 2.7 if its not 100% scaling and that makes it faster then
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
2,529
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
2,329
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
If this is true, then yes it would be over Skylake even. But AMD has said that about Bulldozer over K10 as well.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 17543
Joined: 2012-05-18
Senior Member
Posts: 17543
Joined: 2012-05-18
#5278992 Posted on: 05/25/2016 05:24 PM
Ok found one review with cinebench15 single threaded
Amd fx 3850: 98, best case scenario 196cb.. For example I get 194cb at 4.7Ghz
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i5-6600k-review
So even if its ~ 186 it would be fast, Oc and ~200cb for sure
Ok found one review with cinebench15 single threaded
Amd fx 3850: 98, best case scenario 196cb.. For example I get 194cb at 4.7Ghz
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i5-6600k-review
So even if its ~ 186 it would be fast, Oc and ~200cb for sure
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 7211
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 7211
Joined: 2006-09-24
#5278993 Posted on: 05/25/2016 05:27 PM
Ok found one review with cinebench15 single threaded
Amd fx 3850: 98, best case scenario 196cb.. For example I get 194cb at 4.7Ghz
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i5-6600k-review
best case scenario would be then 196 @ 4.2. It would be great actually. Doubt it will happen but would be great.
Ok found one review with cinebench15 single threaded
Amd fx 3850: 98, best case scenario 196cb.. For example I get 194cb at 4.7Ghz
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i5-6600k-review
best case scenario would be then 196 @ 4.2. It would be great actually. Doubt it will happen but would be great.
Spartan
Senior Member
Posts: 676
Joined: 2015-06-25
Senior Member
Posts: 676
Joined: 2015-06-25
#5278997 Posted on: 05/25/2016 05:41 PM
I think it's more like ~160 with +60% IPC; and double in multi threading compared to fx8350, if it's 8c/16t.
I think it's more like ~160 with +60% IPC; and double in multi threading compared to fx8350, if it's 8c/16t.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 17543
Joined: 2012-05-18
If that's also by single core performance then it could be, what's current Fx8350 single core cinebench15 scenario? so around 2x, and we can get aprox. final score..
Edit: looked around and found this passmark
Passmark
AMD FX-8370 Eight-Core (Orochi)
1,515
so around 2.7 if its not 100% scaling and that makes it faster then
Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz
2,529
Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz
2,329
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html