Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Review: AMD FX 8370 and 8370E processor
We review the 8-core AMD FX 8370 and 8370E processor today. You guys have been hearing the magic word 'Vishera' for a while now and it is the codename for the Piledriver core based FX series processors from AMD. The CPU tested today has eight physical CPU cores, it will have a base clock of 4000 MHz, and can Turbo towards 4200. And that makes the FX series a multi-threaded high frequency monster. You can read our review right here at Guru3D of course.
Read the full review here.
« GIGABYTE Launches Radeon R9 285 Overclock Edition · Review: AMD FX 8370 and 8370E processor
· Review: Radeon R9-285 »
Review: AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 processor performance - 10/26/2012 07:13 AM
Earlier this week the AMD FX 8350 processor launched, in this review we'll look at all four processors, the AMD FX 8350 - 8320 - 6300 and 4300 in a easy to read performance review. This article is nothing more then a performance overview of all four processors released earlier this week. So this article is basically functions as a performance chart overview.
Review: AMD FX 8350 processor - 10/23/2012 12:08 PM
In this article we test and review the new AMD FX 8350 processor. AMD unleashes PileDriver cores on the new Vishera a codenamed architecture.
AMD FX 8350 to arrive in Q3 2012 - 06/27/2012 11:03 AM
AMD is working on three new FX series chips; the 8350, 6300 and 4320. The FX 8350 is a new eight-core model with unlocked multiplier and 16MB cache, clockspeeds are still unknown but they should be hi...
AMD FX 8150 processor at 8.80 GHz - 05/29/2012 10:13 AM
The AMD processors can run high clock frequencies, this one it even beyond that, 8805.64 MHz, to be precise.
AMD FX 8150 - 8120 - 6100 and 4100 performance review - 10/13/2011 10:59 AM
Yesterday AMD released the FX series Zambezi - Bulldozer based processors. Everybody has been focusing on that most high-end AMD FX 8150 processor. However there where three other processors released....
SoloCreep
Senior Member
Posts: 686
Joined: 2005-07-31
Senior Member
Posts: 686
Joined: 2005-07-31
#4905724 Posted on: 09/04/2014 08:01 AM
They are still piles of crap when compared to Intel.. Why oh why did I not go Intel when I had 5 grand to burn. I hadn't been into gaming for quite awhile and out of the PC loop. I didn't do any homework when I made my purchase. I had no idea that Intel was so far ahead at the time. I just figured I'd get a fast AMD chip and it would be close to the Intel chip in its price range. Boy was I ever wrong! Yeah I can still play my games at 1080p with no lag but still, I know I made a huge mistake. When I get some extra cash, I am dumping AMD for good. Screw their CPU's and GPU's.. I am more angry with myself, not AMD. Its not their fault I was an idiot for buying their junk.
They are still piles of crap when compared to Intel.. Why oh why did I not go Intel when I had 5 grand to burn. I hadn't been into gaming for quite awhile and out of the PC loop. I didn't do any homework when I made my purchase. I had no idea that Intel was so far ahead at the time. I just figured I'd get a fast AMD chip and it would be close to the Intel chip in its price range. Boy was I ever wrong! Yeah I can still play my games at 1080p with no lag but still, I know I made a huge mistake. When I get some extra cash, I am dumping AMD for good. Screw their CPU's and GPU's.. I am more angry with myself, not AMD. Its not their fault I was an idiot for buying their junk.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 6678
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 6678
Joined: 2012-11-10
#4906152 Posted on: 09/04/2014 07:58 PM
So.... you don't keep up with PC stuff lately (and therefore don't have a need to upgrade), you had 5 grand to spend but you didn't even opt for AMD's highest-end product, you acknowledge your CPU keeps up just fine with your tasks, you bought into something that you SHOULD have known was already inferior during the release date, and yet you still complain. I too would be angry with myself in your shoes - that's a big chain of easily preventable scenarios.
They are still piles of crap when compared to Intel.. Why oh why did I not go Intel when I had 5 grand to burn. I hadn't been into gaming for quite awhile and out of the PC loop. I didn't do any homework when I made my purchase. I had no idea that Intel was so far ahead at the time. I just figured I'd get a fast AMD chip and it would be close to the Intel chip in its price range. Boy was I ever wrong! Yeah I can still play my games at 1080p with no lag but still, I know I made a huge mistake. When I get some extra cash, I am dumping AMD for good. Screw their CPU's and GPU's.. I am more angry with myself, not AMD. Its not their fault I was an idiot for buying their junk.
So.... you don't keep up with PC stuff lately (and therefore don't have a need to upgrade), you had 5 grand to spend but you didn't even opt for AMD's highest-end product, you acknowledge your CPU keeps up just fine with your tasks, you bought into something that you SHOULD have known was already inferior during the release date, and yet you still complain. I too would be angry with myself in your shoes - that's a big chain of easily preventable scenarios.
Corrupt^
Senior Member
Posts: 7134
Joined: 2005-12-02
Senior Member
Posts: 7134
Joined: 2005-12-02
#4906200 Posted on: 09/04/2014 08:47 PM
Nothing wrong with their GPU's tbh. Buying ATI was probably one of the best things they did, considering how they're slacking behind Intel now.
I am dumping AMD for good. Screw their CPU's and GPU's.. I am more angry with myself, not AMD. Its not their fault I was an idiot for buying their junk.
Nothing wrong with their GPU's tbh. Buying ATI was probably one of the best things they did, considering how they're slacking behind Intel now.
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 985
Joined: 2001-08-12
Senior Member
Posts: 985
Joined: 2001-08-12
#4906202 Posted on: 09/04/2014 08:48 PM
I must be dim i don't understand what solo is going on about he says that the stuff plays without lag and does everything he needs it to yet is angry because it's not intel?
I must be dim i don't understand what solo is going on about he says that the stuff plays without lag and does everything he needs it to yet is angry because it's not intel?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 20
Joined: 2014-01-14
L3 cache latency looks improved by 100%.