Radeon RX 6500 XT review
MSI Vigor GK71 Sonic keyboard review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Suprim X 12GB review
TeamGroup A440 PRO Special 5eries 4TB NVMe review
Core i5 12400 processor review
MSI MAG B660M Mortar WIFI review
Biostar Z690 Valkyrie review
TeamGroup A440 PRO PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
DDR5 scaling with G.Skill TridentZ5 6000 CL36 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 Noctua OC review
AMD Epyc 7763 CPUs break Cinebench world record, crushes Intel Xeon in performance
AMD has released their Epyc 7003 processors. Based on Milan microarchitecture and up to 64 cores based on Zen3. In a video AMD, they broke the record for Cinebench R23 with two Epyc 7763 CPUs.
AMD used a reference motherboard for Epyc Milan with two sockets for this. What's funny is that it took less than ten seconds to complete the full multi-threaded test of Cinebench R23.AMD applied regular server air coolers. The multi-core score result was 113631 points, the previous record was 105170 points based on a heavily overclocked Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
When compared to Intel's top model the Xeon Platinum 8380 (Ice Lake-SP generation), AMD crushes it. Two Xeons score 74630 points. The flagship Intel chips each cost about 8100 USD. AMD was 52% faster as well as being cheaper at $7890 each.
| AMD Epyc Milan vs Intel Ice Lake-SP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cinebench R23 Score (Dual Socket) | Recommended price per 1,000 pieces | Cores / threads | Base/boost clock | L3 cache | TDP | |
| AMD Epyc 7763 | 113,631 | 7,890 USD | 64/128 | 2.45 / 3.5 | 256 MB | 280 watts |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 | 74,630 | 8,099 USD | 40/80 | 2.3 / 3.2-3.0 | 60 MB | 270 watts |
Next-gen AMD EPYC (Genoa) Would get 50% larger socket SP5, 96 cores and 400W TDP - 03/01/2021 09:27 AM
AMD is seriously pounding its way into the data-center. If anything, EPYC has proven to be a very cost-effective and high-performance solution in the data-center. But what's next? Well, that would be...
ZEN3 Based AMD Epyc Milan Server Processors TDP up-to 280W - 01/30/2021 10:25 AM
While Intel is still HUGE in the server market for processors, AMD the past two years have seen double-digit sales growth, as well, they offer faster, cheaper, and more secure products. That's said, ...
Intel Dual Socket Ice Lake-SP Processors Pitted Against AMD EPYC Rome - 07/29/2020 11:42 AM
Intel is hard at work to release a new server series processors; Intel Ice Lake-SP Processors would be based on 10nm. At Geekbench a result has been spotted, a dual CPU configuration of two 28-core G...
AMD Epyc Milan (ZEN3) generation CPU Surfaces in Linux Reference - 07/06/2020 08:48 AM
If you are smiling at your 64-core ZEN2 based beast of a PC or Server, it'll be based on the current Rome architecture. These processors are beasts. But we all know that AMD is paving that processor ...
AMD EPYC Expands High-Performance Cloud Computing System Wins - 06/23/2020 08:20 AM
Momentum for AMD EPYC processors in advanced science and health research continues to grow with new installations at Indiana University, Purdue University and CERN as well as high-performance computin...
King Mustard
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2012-10-31
Member
Posts: 61
Joined: 2012-10-31
#5905859 Posted on: 04/19/2021 09:12 AM
They're cheaper and faster but cost a little more to run, looking at the higher TDP.
I imagine that matters to datacenters.
Still - overall better from the looks of things
They're cheaper and faster but cost a little more to run, looking at the higher TDP.
I imagine that matters to datacenters.
Still - overall better from the looks of things
RED.Misfit
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 2019-10-08
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: 2019-10-08
#5905862 Posted on: 04/19/2021 09:22 AM
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
Ratilt
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-03-03
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2020-03-03
#5905866 Posted on: 04/19/2021 09:57 AM
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
Just lacking cores? I don't think you see the bigger picture here. If it is "just cores" why Intel not mach it or come close? Efficiency also matters for the server market and AMD product is leaps and bounds ahead of Intel's. I wonder what would've been the TDP of Xeons if Intel add 20 more cores. Besides, I've found Intel's TDP inaccurate of what it actually is.
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
Just lacking cores? I don't think you see the bigger picture here. If it is "just cores" why Intel not mach it or come close? Efficiency also matters for the server market and AMD product is leaps and bounds ahead of Intel's. I wonder what would've been the TDP of Xeons if Intel add 20 more cores. Besides, I've found Intel's TDP inaccurate of what it actually is.
kapu
Senior Member
Posts: 5153
Joined: 2006-12-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5153
Joined: 2006-12-22
#5905867 Posted on: 04/19/2021 10:03 AM
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
Not ture at all . Look at performance per watt . For datacenters it is what is most important and at this point difference is huge , just another level . Like i said before , like a decade of performance leap.
The IPC looks "roughly the same" between the two.
52%+ performance for AMD for 60% more cores.
At this point, Intel is just lacking cores.
Not ture at all . Look at performance per watt . For datacenters it is what is most important and at this point difference is huge , just another level . Like i said before , like a decade of performance leap.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 5153
Joined: 2006-12-22
Intel counterpart looks like decade old tech looking at scores and TDP.