AMD Ryzen 5 3600X review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
Team Group T-Force 4133 MHz 16GB DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII HERO (Wi-fi) review
MSI MEG X570 Godlike review
Corsair NightSword RGB gaming mouse review
Corsair MP600 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD review
Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER JetStream review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X TRIO review
Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER JetStream review
AMD Epyc 7452: Rome CPU with 32 cores and 2.35 GHz spotted
While Ryzen 3000 (Matisse) is on track for a release next month on the 7th of the 7th, it is a bit silent on the Epic side. Until now that is, an Epyc 7452 server processes got listed, yep the one with 32 cores and 64 threads has got to be Zen2 based.
The Epyc 7452 clocks at 2.35 GHz, which is 350 MHz higher than its predecessor. The description of the chipset "Starship / Matisse" indicates that this is the new generation "Rome" with Zen 2. In addition, the performance increase to Epyc 7551 in the listed benchmarks can not be explained solely by the clock increase, which also points to Zen 2. A result of this entry have been summarized in the diagram below. Geometrically, the performance is 44 percent higher than the Epyc 7551, but the Epyc 7452's CPU clock is 17.5 percent higher. The barely changed naming is backed by a photo published in Leaks notorious Chiphell forum. On it is an AMD Epyc with the model number 7452 on the package.
When AMD will introduce the second Epyc generation called Rome with up to 64 cores is still unclear. Most recently, AMD had called only the third quarter of 2019 for the market launch. Originally the server CPUs should appear before the desktop counterparts, but this has apparently changed.
Sales AMD Epyc CPUs to increase in third quarter, but data center market is declining - 06/06/2019 05:32 PM
With the new ZEN2 architecture coming up AMD enters an exciting time. AMD's Epyc server and data center CPUs both in sales and share compared to Intel are to increase in Q3 this year. The new genera...
AMD Epyc 2 processor with 32 cores appears in Online Database - 05/20/2019 08:34 AM
Yeah, it's not exactly a secret that AMD has been working hard to get ZEN2 towards EPYC 2, but things might be moving faster than expected as the first one already shows itself in an online database ...
AMD EPYC CPUs, AMD Radeon Instinct GPUs to power Cray Supercomputer - 05/07/2019 01:47 PM
AMD and Cray unveil what is expected to be the world’s fastest supercomputer – defining a new standard for high-performance computing and pushing the technology boundaries of compu...
Rumor: AMD Epyc2 processors could get 64 cores over 8+1 dies - 10/31/2018 02:48 PM
That AMD has been going insanely strong with many-core processors is not a surprise, you've read all our Threadripper reviews and have learned that the top tier processors (e.g. 32-core versions) hav...
AMD and Oracle Collaborate to Provide AMD EPYC Processor-Based Offering in the Cloud - 10/24/2018 08:51 AM
Today at Oracle OpenWorld 2018, AMD (NASDAQ: AMD) announced the availability of the first AMD EPYC processor-based instance on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. With this announcement, Oracle becomes the...
HybOj
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 2016-03-18
Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 2016-03-18
#5681785 Posted on: 06/18/2019 11:22 AM
no it will not .)
no it will not .)
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5681798 Posted on: 06/18/2019 12:20 PM
I am wondering how well the TR 64C will perform with PBO active, Also would be like to see YouTuber's commenting about the CPU performance increase since first Rizen and how did it affect them regarding the Video Editing/Rendering times,
I am wondering how well the TR 64C will perform with PBO active, Also would be like to see YouTuber's commenting about the CPU performance increase since first Rizen and how did it affect them regarding the Video Editing/Rendering times,
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 875
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5681801 Posted on: 06/18/2019 12:30 PM
"When AMD will introduce the second Epyc generation called Rome with up to 64 cores is still unclear. Most recently, AMD had called only the third quarter of 2019 for the market launch. Originally the server CPUs should appear before the desktop counterparts, but this has apparently changed."
Original plan was dumb, as they need to stock up on that 1% best chips for these.
Although +7nm is already on trials and going to mass production by 2020, 7nm is still expensive and yields are not perfect.
Thankfully Zen2 chiplets are small enough.
"When AMD will introduce the second Epyc generation called Rome with up to 64 cores is still unclear. Most recently, AMD had called only the third quarter of 2019 for the market launch. Originally the server CPUs should appear before the desktop counterparts, but this has apparently changed."
Original plan was dumb, as they need to stock up on that 1% best chips for these.
Although +7nm is already on trials and going to mass production by 2020, 7nm is still expensive and yields are not perfect.
Thankfully Zen2 chiplets are small enough.
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5681804 Posted on: 06/18/2019 12:33 PM
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
las
Senior Member
Posts: 260
Joined: 2013-03-18
Senior Member
Posts: 260
Joined: 2013-03-18
#5681807 Posted on: 06/18/2019 12:41 PM
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
GF 12nm is a terrible terrible node. Closer to 16nm in reality.
Should only be used for low to mid-end stuff.
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
GF 12nm is a terrible terrible node. Closer to 16nm in reality.
Should only be used for low to mid-end stuff.
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 546
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 546
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5681864 Posted on: 06/18/2019 02:45 PM
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
No they can't without redoing the design, new masks etc. This would cost a ton of cash so no this will not happen nor is it a good idea on so many levels. The more they make on 7nm the cheaper it will get as TSMC works out the kinks. AMD's CPU chiplets are really small so they will eventually get very good yields so lower costs.
Currently AMD's IO die and chipset are actually the same layout, exactly the same size chip to help with economies of scale manufacturing the both dies at GloFlo. This is where they saved money and it was indigenous to make the IO die and the chipset the same. I expect on Zen3 this IO die/chipset to move to TSMC as well and be made on the "old" 7nm process so we no longer need a fan to cool the chipset and it will also lower the IO dies power needs from 15w.
Can AMD make the Zen2.0 Chiplets on GF12nm? , Lets say 4 8c chiplets + IO chiplet on TR4?
So they can make 32C EPYC/TR Zen2.0 for cheap?
No they can't without redoing the design, new masks etc. This would cost a ton of cash so no this will not happen nor is it a good idea on so many levels. The more they make on 7nm the cheaper it will get as TSMC works out the kinks. AMD's CPU chiplets are really small so they will eventually get very good yields so lower costs.
Currently AMD's IO die and chipset are actually the same layout, exactly the same size chip to help with economies of scale manufacturing the both dies at GloFlo. This is where they saved money and it was indigenous to make the IO die and the chipset the same. I expect on Zen3 this IO die/chipset to move to TSMC as well and be made on the "old" 7nm process so we no longer need a fan to cool the chipset and it will also lower the IO dies power needs from 15w.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4132
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4132
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5681871 Posted on: 06/18/2019 02:54 PM
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
JamesSneed
Senior Member
Posts: 546
Joined: 2017-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 546
Joined: 2017-02-14
#5681897 Posted on: 06/18/2019 03:34 PM
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
I think what you are going to see is the higher the core counts the larger AMD's advantage. AMD's 7nm chips use so much less power they will be able to clock the chips higher than Intel parts to fit into typical server thermal envelopes.
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
I think what you are going to see is the higher the core counts the larger AMD's advantage. AMD's 7nm chips use so much less power they will be able to clock the chips higher than Intel parts to fit into typical server thermal envelopes.
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
Senior Member
Posts: 419
Joined: 2005-04-04
#5681930 Posted on: 06/18/2019 04:59 PM
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
Epyc 7XX1 = Zen 1.0
Epyc 7XX2 = Zen 2.0
A bit weird how this is CPU is an all-around upgrade, yet the part number is lower. I still haven't fully figured out the Epyc number scheme.
Anyway, if we are to take these results seriously, that suggests a 15% IPC gain, which is pretty much what AMD has been touting this whole time.
Epyc 7XX1 = Zen 1.0
Epyc 7XX2 = Zen 2.0
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 6567
Joined: 2009-11-13
I'll run Crysis just fine