AMD cuts 710 jobs after disappointing results
It was in the line of expectation. The new ceo Lisa Su will apply these job cuts AMD will cut 7% of its staff, 710 jobs after a disappointing period. The profits from APUs and Graphics card dropped with 16 percent.
The job cuts will likely get in effect this year already, which will save 9 Million USD, and 85 Million over the entire next year. The entire reorganization will cost 57 million and another 134 million the year following. The division that produces semi-custom chips for PS4 and XBox One did perform well. Together with the Enterprise and Embedded branch profit there was 108 Million USD.
SUNNYVALE, CA -- (Marketwired) -- 10/16/14 -- AMD (NYSE: AMD)
- Q3 2014 Results
- Revenue of $1.43 billion, flat sequentially and a decrease of 2 percent year-over-year
- Gross margin of 35 percent
- Operating income of $63 million and non-GAAP(1) operating income of $66 million
- Net income of $17 million, earnings per share of $0.02 and non-GAAP(1) net income of$20 million, non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.03
- Announces restructuring plan to better position the company for profitability and long-term growth
AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced revenue for the third quarter of 2014 of $1.43 billion, operating income of $63 million and net income of $17 million, or $0.02 per share. Non-GAAP (1)operating income was $66 million and non-GAAP (1) net income was $20 million, or $0.03 per share.
"AMD's third quarter financial performance reflects progess in diversifying our business," said Dr.Lisa Su, AMD president and CEO. "Our Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment results were strong; however, performance in our Computing and Graphics segment was mixed based on challenging market conditions that require us to take further steps to evolve and strengthen the financial performance of this business. Our top priority is to deliver leadership technologies and products as we continue to transform AMD."
GAAP Financial Results | ||||||
Q3-14 | Q2-14 | Q3-13 | ||||
Revenue | $1.43B | $1.44B | $1.46B | |||
Operating income | $63M | $63M | $95M | |||
Net income (loss) / Earnings (loss) per share | $17M/$0.02 | $(36)M/$(0.05) | $48M/$0.06 | |||
Non-GAAP Financial Results1 | ||||||
Q3-14 | Q2-14 | Q3-13 | ||||
Revenue | $1.43B | $1.44B | $1.46B | |||
Operating income | $66M | $67M | $78M | |||
Net income / Earnings per share | $20M/$0.03 | $17M/$0.02 | $31M/$0.04 | |||
Effective July 1, 2014, AMD reorganized into two business groups, one focused on the traditional PC market and the second focused on adjacent high-growth opportunities.
Accordingly, AMD has two reportable segments:
- Computing and Graphics, which primarily includes desktop and notebook processors and chipsets, discrete GPUs and professional graphics; and
- Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom, which primarily includes server and embedded processors, dense servers, semi-custom SoC products, engineering services and royalties.
Quarterly Financial Summary
- Gross margin was 35 percent in Q3 2014.
- Gross margin was flat sequentially and included a $27 million, or 2 percent benefit, from revenue related to technology licensing.
- Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $938 million at the end of the quarter, essentially flat from the prior quarter.
- Total debt at the end of the quarter was $2.20 billion.
- Computing and Graphics segment revenue decreased 6 percent sequentially and decreased 16 percent year-over-year. The sequential decrease was primarily driven by lower chipset and GPU sales. The year-over-year decline was primarily due to decreased notebook processor and chipset sales.
- Operating loss was $17 million, compared with an operating loss of $6 million in Q2 2014 and operating income of $9 million in Q3 2013. The sequential decrease was primarily driven by lower revenue while the year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by lower revenue partially offset by lower operating expenses.
- Client average selling price (ASP) increased sequentially and year-over-year primarily driven by a richer mix of notebook processor sales.
- GPU ASP decreased sequentially due to lower desktop GPU ASP and increased year-over-year.
- Enterprise, Embedded and Semi-Custom segment revenue increased 6 percent sequentially and 21 percent year-over-year primarily driven by increased sales of semi-custom SoCs.
- Operating income was $108 million compared with $97 million in Q2 2014 and $92 millionin Q3 2013. The sequential and year-over-year increase was primarily due to increased sales of semi-custom SoCs.
- Embedded revenue grew by double digits on a percentage basis sequentially.
Q4 2014 Restructuring and Transformation Initiatives
As a part of AMD's ongoing transformation work, the company has developed a targeted restructuring plan to better position AMD for profitability and long-term growth while aligning investments and resources with high-priority opportunities.
The restructuring plan, which will be largely implemented in Q4 2014, is expected to:
- Reduce global headcount by 7 percent, largely expected to be completed by the end of Q4 2014;
- Align AMD's real estate footprint with its reduced headcount;
- Result in a restructuring and impairment charge of approximately $57 million in Q4 2014, primarily related to severance, and a restructuring charge of approximately $13 million in 1H 2015, primarily related to real estate actions;
- The company expects to make cash payments related to these actions of approximately$34 million in Q4 2014 and $20 million in 1H 2015;
- Result in operational savings, primarily in operating expenses, of approximately $9 million in Q4 2014 and approximately $85 million in 2015.
"While decisions that impact the size of our global team are never entered into lightly, this is the right step to ensure we prioritize our resources and engineering investments in our highest-priority opportunities that can drive improved profitability and long-term growth," said Dr. Su.
AMD cuts prices for R9 28x series as well - 10/08/2014 08:49 AM
We already reported that AMD lowered the prices for the R9 290 and 290X range by 25% The Radeon R9 290 is dropping slowly but steadily from 399 USD towards 299 USD, and the big daddy R9 290X was pri...
AMD cuts pricing of several A6 and A8 APUs - 11/08/2013 06:01 PM
CPU World noticed that three A6 and A8 series APUs have been lowered in price. AMD also revealed the price of the new A10-6790K APU. The A6-6400K received a price cut of 12.7% while the A8-6500 and A...
AMD cuts APU prices in April - 03/22/2013 08:47 AM
AMD plans to cut some of its APU prices at the end of April to welcome its next-generation Richland APUs, set for launch in early June, according to sources from PC players. Prices of AMD's APUs incl...
AMD cuts pricing of 18 Athlon II and A-series processors - 11/07/2012 10:07 AM
AMD updated its official processor price list. The CPU and APU designers lowered the pricing of all Athlon II processors, as well as some A-series APUs. The APUs receive price cuts between 3.7% and 21.7%, while the Athlon II series gets a reduction between 14.7% and 31.6%. The most heavily discounted processors are Athlon II X4 640 and X2 265. Their prices were dropped by 31% and 30% respectively. The remaining Athlon II X3 and X4 parts received 14.5% - 21% price reductions, and they are now firmly in the Pentium price range.
AMD cuts prices releases Radeon HD 6950 1GB - 01/26/2011 01:23 PM
To compete with the yesterday's announced GeForce GTX 560 Ti from NVIDIA AMD releases the Radeon HD 6950 with 1GB GDDR5. Here's a little price update: Radeon HD 6870 1GB: drops from $239 to $219 Rad...
Senior Member
Posts: 202
Joined: 2014-09-19
Sorry for my bad typo i meant overall.
Nvidia is better in term of Stability,power efficiency,better cooling,better driver and of course better overclocking.
Reason why Nvidia is on top because u can see my above because post(pic that is posted) they spent much more than AMD on research and development and that is the fact and reality.
Senior Member
Posts: 2809
Joined: 2011-05-17
Sorry for my bad typo i meant overall.
Nvidia is better in term of Stability,power efficiency,better cooling,better driver and of course better overclocking.
Reason why Nvidia is on top because u can see my above because post(pic that is posted) they spent much more than AMD on research and development and that is the fact and reality.
Depends on how you look at the scenario. If you ask me, given how well their GPUs do, AMD has more talent than NVidia. That is why NVidia needs to spend that much more to achieve the same if not a little bit better. The other side of the coin, one cannot be afraid to fail if success is the goal. So of course there is going to be failures. AMD happens to have stumbled upon their netburst equivalent. Hopefully it is not so detrimental that it drags them down and out.
Senior Member
Posts: 532
Joined: 2005-10-09
Sorry for my bad typo i meant overall.
Nvidia is better in term of Stability,power efficiency,better cooling,better driver and of course better overclocking.
Reason why Nvidia is on top because u can see my above because post(pic that is posted) they spent much more than AMD on research and development and that is the fact and reality.
Up until the very recent 970 and 980 release, AMD's cards had better per watt performance when comparing the R series to the 700 series. I am not sure where you are getting your info.
Cooling has more to do with card manufactures than anyone else. Some cards have better coolers than others. Has little to do with AMD or Nvidia unless you compare reference cooler designs (which most cards don't adhere to).
AMD has a driver problem for sure. The biggest issues are with the 14.x drivers. I really hope they get them sorted out. Nvidia is not immune though and have had their fare share of issues as well.
Overclocking is moot. You're not buying the ability to OC. With that said I've seen some great OCs on 290Xs, so I again would like to know your source.
Senior Member
Posts: 2425
Joined: 2003-12-15
yes the 290 cards were and still are famous for their power efficiency and excellent thermal behavior

Senior Member
Posts: 810
Joined: 2014-02-23
It is a very good dream but i hope AMD stay alive at that point.
It is a fact AMD will never beat Nvidia on performance,power efficiency and reliability but what AMD has only left is with price point.
They trade wins in the performance department with every card series, this is how it's been for a long time.