MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti DUKE review
Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING OC 8G review
MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
Asus GeForce RTX 2080 Ti RoG Strix review
GeForce RTX 2080 Founders review
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders review
HyperX Predator DDR4 RGB 32GB 2933 MHz review
Nvidia Turing GeForce 2080 (Ti) architecture review
Ballistix Sport AT Gaming DDR4 RGB 32GB 3000 MHz review
Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD review
AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano was announced during the live-stream even last month. The card will be a small form factor Fiji based solution with 4 GB HBM and air based cooling.
The product would be 19cm in length, offers 2x the perf of the 290X at half the power - it is now confirmed launching in August.
AMD confirmed this info during its quarter result conference call. It will be the 3rd product deriving from the Fiji range GPUs and follows a mITX form factor. The spec for this product have not been released just yet but expect, hoqwever the it'll be a cutdown Fiji GPU, the original design has 64 ROPs, 256 texture mapping units 64 GCN units with 4096 stream processors.
Based on recent slides the card offers 2X the performance per watt and 2X the performance density of AMD’s previous flagship, the R9 290X. The product is six inch long with a 175W TDP.
AMD Confirms HBA High Memory Bandwith for Graphics Cards - 05/07/2015 07:32 AM
AMD also has shared more information about the choice for HBA graphics memory usage with it's upcoming Graphics Cards. Rumors have been on-going for a long time now....
AMD confirms Radeon HD 6950 1GB for $279 - 01/19/2011 01:16 PM
Advanced Micro Devices late on Monday announced the incoming of premium-class Radeon HD 6950 graphics board with reduced amount of onboard memory at $269 - $279 price-point as well as the massively f...
AMD confirms six-core desktop CPU - 09/23/2009 10:32 AM
We already mentioned in our Phenom II X4 965 that the next logical step for AMD is to intro six-core processors. It is now confirmed that the company will indeed release six-core desktop processors ne...
AMD confirms the launch of Fusion in 2011 - 08/04/2009 09:05 AM
It is apparantly now confirmed that AMD's first Fusion parts will see light as early as 2011 already. AMD Fusion is the codename for a future next-generation microprocessor design and the product of ...
AMD confirms 'Atom-smasher' chip - 07/19/2008 09:31 AM
AMD will unfold its plan to take on Intel's Atom in November, newly promoted CEO Dirk Meyer said last night.AMD's is currently working on a chip codenamed 'Bobcat', a single-core, 64-bi...
Ziggymac
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-01-22
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 2015-01-22
#5123820 Posted on: 07/17/2015 09:00 AM
Lol, its not twice as powerful as a 290X.
Its roughly the same performance as a 290X but uses about half the power.
In other words, its twice as powerful 'per watt' which is easy to misinterpret until that second cup of coffee
Lol, its not twice as powerful as a 290X.
Its roughly the same performance as a 290X but uses about half the power.
In other words, its twice as powerful 'per watt' which is easy to misinterpret until that second cup of coffee
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5123837 Posted on: 07/17/2015 09:42 AM
So let me get this straight. Fury X is not twice as powerful as the 290x, Nano will be a cut down Fury X and it will be twice as powerful as the 290x while consuming half the power.
When is this false marketing from AMD going to stop?
I'm willing to be that near release they're gonna do something like 'yeaaah it's actually not twice as powerful' just like they did with the Fury X. Zomg Titan killer and at E3 'yeaaaaah it's around 980Ti levels, not Titan". "Yeaaah it doesn't have 640 GB/s bandwidth anymore". "Yeaaaah the boxes say it's 480GB/s. "Yeaaah in reality it's even lower than that".
Call me a hater if you want, but stuff like this is why I avoid AMD. "Fastest card on the market" has been overused so much I automatically skip reading it when I read a press conference from AMD.
And now those Nano statements piss me off.
So let me get this straight. Fury X is not twice as powerful as the 290x, Nano will be a cut down Fury X and it will be twice as powerful as the 290x while consuming half the power.
When is this false marketing from AMD going to stop?
I'm willing to be that near release they're gonna do something like 'yeaaah it's actually not twice as powerful' just like they did with the Fury X. Zomg Titan killer and at E3 'yeaaaaah it's around 980Ti levels, not Titan". "Yeaaah it doesn't have 640 GB/s bandwidth anymore". "Yeaaaah the boxes say it's 480GB/s. "Yeaaah in reality it's even lower than that".
Call me a hater if you want, but stuff like this is why I avoid AMD. "Fastest card on the market" has been overused so much I automatically skip reading it when I read a press conference from AMD.
And now those Nano statements piss me off.
Noufel
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: 2013-05-12
Member
Posts: 89
Joined: 2013-05-12
#5123840 Posted on: 07/17/2015 09:55 AM
AMD realy did a great job with the power efficiency of the fiji gpu it's on par with maxwell now.
I hope that it will launch with proper drivers to
see the fury true power especialy with win 10
AMD realy did a great job with the power efficiency of the fiji gpu it's on par with maxwell now.
I hope that it will launch with proper drivers to
see the fury true power especialy with win 10
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 7355
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 7355
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5123843 Posted on: 07/17/2015 09:57 AM
So let me get this straight. Fury X is not twice as powerful as the 290x, Nano will be a cut down Fury X and it will be twice as powerful as the 290x while consuming half the power.
When is this false marketing from AMD going to stop?
I'm willing to be that near release they're gonna do something like 'yeaaah it's actually not twice as powerful' just like they did with the Fury X. Zomg Titan killer and at E3 'yeaaaaah it's around 980Ti levels, not Titan". "Yeaaah it doesn't have 640 GB/s bandwidth anymore". "Yeaaaah the boxes say it's 480GB/s. "Yeaaah in reality it's even lower than that".
Call me a hater if you want, but stuff like this is why I avoid AMD. "Fastest card on the market" has been overused so much I automatically skip reading it when I read a press conference from AMD.
And now those Nano statements piss me off.
That thing you are raging about is not AMD's official text, it is posted by Hilbert (if he actually wrote that).
If you look at slides, they say something different. 2x performance per size of card and 2x performance per watt. And that is correct.
Text at top is apparently wrong as it basically means 4x performance per watt.
So let me get this straight. Fury X is not twice as powerful as the 290x, Nano will be a cut down Fury X and it will be twice as powerful as the 290x while consuming half the power.
When is this false marketing from AMD going to stop?
I'm willing to be that near release they're gonna do something like 'yeaaah it's actually not twice as powerful' just like they did with the Fury X. Zomg Titan killer and at E3 'yeaaaaah it's around 980Ti levels, not Titan". "Yeaaah it doesn't have 640 GB/s bandwidth anymore". "Yeaaaah the boxes say it's 480GB/s. "Yeaaah in reality it's even lower than that".
Call me a hater if you want, but stuff like this is why I avoid AMD. "Fastest card on the market" has been overused so much I automatically skip reading it when I read a press conference from AMD.
And now those Nano statements piss me off.
That thing you are raging about is not AMD's official text, it is posted by Hilbert (if he actually wrote that).
If you look at slides, they say something different. 2x performance per size of card and 2x performance per watt. And that is correct.
Text at top is apparently wrong as it basically means 4x performance per watt.
xIcarus
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
Senior Member
Posts: 924
Joined: 2010-08-24
#5123863 Posted on: 07/17/2015 10:42 AM
That thing you are raging about is not AMD's official text, it is posted by Hilbert (if he actually wrote that).
If you look at slides, they say something different. 2x performance per size of card and 2x performance per watt. And that is correct.
Text at top is apparently wrong as it basically means 4x performance per watt.
Then I apologize. I wouldn't be surprised by AMD pulling something like that.
And I doubt Hilbert wrote that. He knows it's not true.
That thing you are raging about is not AMD's official text, it is posted by Hilbert (if he actually wrote that).
If you look at slides, they say something different. 2x performance per size of card and 2x performance per watt. And that is correct.
Text at top is apparently wrong as it basically means 4x performance per watt.
Then I apologize. I wouldn't be surprised by AMD pulling something like that.
And I doubt Hilbert wrote that. He knows it's not true.
PNeV
Senior Member
Posts: 2071
Joined: 2009-04-20
Senior Member
Posts: 2071
Joined: 2009-04-20
#5123864 Posted on: 07/17/2015 10:50 AM
This is the Card I am waiting to see! These new cards are overkill for my 1080p screen but the 390/390X cards still have high TDP. Lets hope it delivers somewhat (no pun).
This is the Card I am waiting to see! These new cards are overkill for my 1080p screen but the 390/390X cards still have high TDP. Lets hope it delivers somewhat (no pun).
KissSh0t
Senior Member
Posts: 5993
Joined: 2011-10-22
Senior Member
Posts: 5993
Joined: 2011-10-22
#5123874 Posted on: 07/17/2015 11:19 AM
This is the type of thing they should put in the consoles.... like... seriously..
This is the type of thing they should put in the consoles.... like... seriously..
Chillin
Senior Member
Posts: 6815
Joined: 2006-01-18
Senior Member
Posts: 6815
Joined: 2006-01-18
#5123879 Posted on: 07/17/2015 11:37 AM
Cost, heat, power, cost, size, cost.
This is the type of thing they should put in the consoles.... like... seriously..
Cost, heat, power, cost, size, cost.
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 9664
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 9664
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5123880 Posted on: 07/17/2015 11:40 AM
Nice, looking forward to see what Nano can do. AMD is filling every spot, so many cards to choose now.
Nice, looking forward to see what Nano can do. AMD is filling every spot, so many cards to choose now.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 7355
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 7355
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5123882 Posted on: 07/17/2015 11:42 AM
I agree, because AMD got console deals thanks to design which delivered all that within required limits.
Maybe Zen APUs can deliver double performance per watt than PS4 chip. but still, it is better to stay at PS4 chips for sake of one market. Splitting it again by another console would break very reason why consoles are made.
Relatively cheap & unified.
Cost, heat, power, cost, size, cost.
I agree, because AMD got console deals thanks to design which delivered all that within required limits.
Maybe Zen APUs can deliver double performance per watt than PS4 chip. but still, it is better to stay at PS4 chips for sake of one market. Splitting it again by another console would break very reason why consoles are made.
Relatively cheap & unified.
PeteBeMe
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2014-12-27
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2014-12-27
#5123899 Posted on: 07/17/2015 12:22 PM
I really think that the slide has been misinterpreted. The doubling of "performance density" is performance for a given size. So if it is double the performance density and half the size then it is the same performance in a smaller package with no performance increase.
I really think that the slide has been misinterpreted. The doubling of "performance density" is performance for a given size. So if it is double the performance density and half the size then it is the same performance in a smaller package with no performance increase.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11539
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11539
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5123935 Posted on: 07/17/2015 01:26 PM
At the conference the CEO definitely made it sound like it's 290x performance at half the wattage. Which again makes it essentially a GTX970. If they can price it way cheaper & in that form factor, it will be a nice card though.
At the conference the CEO definitely made it sound like it's 290x performance at half the wattage. Which again makes it essentially a GTX970. If they can price it way cheaper & in that form factor, it will be a nice card though.
Rich_Guy
Senior Member
Posts: 11879
Joined: 2003-05-11
Senior Member
Posts: 11879
Joined: 2003-05-11
#5123939 Posted on: 07/17/2015 01:29 PM
It'll be nowhere near the performance of the 290X.
It'll be nowhere near the performance of the 290X.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11539
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11539
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5123940 Posted on: 07/17/2015 01:30 PM
What makes you think that?
It'll be nowhere near the performance of the 290X.
What makes you think that?
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: 2007-08-31
wha??
I'M SOLD if it's true ofcourse