Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6650 XT Gaming X review
Deepcool AS500 PLUS CPU Cooler Review

New Downloads
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.1
Download Samsung Magician v7.1.1.820
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1732
HWiNFO Download v7.24
GeForce 512.77 WHQL driver download
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1960
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.5.1 WHQL driver download
3DMark Download v2.22.7359 + Time Spy
Prime95 download version 30.8 build 15
AIDA64 Download Version 6.70


New Forum Topics
EK Announces Quantum CPU Water Blocks with Walnut Wood Tops GeForce RTX 4090 is twice as fast as RTX 3090 and uses 450W (16128 Shader Cores) [3rd-Party Driver] Amernime Zone Radeon Insight 22.5.1 WHQL Driver Pack (Released) Leak: AMD EPYC Processors Genoa-X, New SP6 Socket, and 160 PCIe Lanes RDNA2 RX6000 Series Owners Thread, Tests, Mods, BIOS & Tweaks ! Just got a 3060! Deepcool twin tower side flow AK620 received a new color, white. AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - Deathloop preview DRiVe-X racing simulator costs just over 20000 USD 5700x & B550 TUF




Guru3D.com » News » AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August

AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 07/17/2015 08:32 AM | source: | 50 comment(s)
AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano was announced during the live-stream even last month. The card will be a small form factor Fiji based solution with 4 GB HBM and air based cooling. 

The product would be 19cm in length, offers 2x the perf of the 290X at half the power - it is now confirmed launching in August.

AMD confirmed this info during its quarter result conference call. It will be the 3rd product deriving from the Fiji range GPUs and follows a mITX form factor. The spec for this product have not been released just yet but expect, hoqwever the it'll be a cutdown Fiji GPU, the original design has  64 ROPs, 256 texture mapping units 64 GCN units with 4096 stream processors. 
 


Based on recent slides the card  offers 2X the performance per watt and 2X the performance density of AMD’s previous flagship, the R9 290X. The product is six inch long with a 175W TDP. 



AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August




« Microsoft To Sell Windows 10 on usb-sticks · AMD Confirms Radeon R9 Nano Launching In August · AMD Posts 2015 Second Quarter Results »

Related Stories

AMD Confirms HBA High Memory Bandwith for Graphics Cards - 05/07/2015 07:32 AM
AMD also has shared more information about the choice for HBA graphics memory usage with it's upcoming Graphics Cards. Rumors have been on-going for a long time now....

AMD confirms Radeon HD 6950 1GB for $279 - 01/19/2011 01:16 PM
Advanced Micro Devices late on Monday announced the incoming of premium-class Radeon HD 6950 graphics board with reduced amount of onboard memory at $269 - $279 price-point as well as the massively f...

AMD confirms six-core desktop CPU - 09/23/2009 10:32 AM
We already mentioned in our Phenom II X4 965 that the next logical step for AMD is to intro six-core processors. It is now confirmed that the company will indeed release six-core desktop processors ne...

AMD confirms the launch of Fusion in 2011 - 08/04/2009 09:05 AM
It is apparantly now confirmed that AMD's first Fusion parts will see light as early as 2011 already. AMD Fusion is the codename for a future next-generation microprocessor design and the product of ...

AMD confirms 'Atom-smasher' chip - 07/19/2008 09:31 AM
AMD will unfold its plan to take on Intel's Atom in November, newly promoted CEO Dirk Meyer said last night.AMD's is currently working on a chip codenamed 'Bobcat', a single-core, 64-bi...


10 pages « < 7 8 9 10


LimitbreakOr
Senior Member



Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-04-02

#5125333 Posted on: 07/20/2015 12:16 AM
even Guru3D here has Fury X at 50W more average power draw than 980Ti.


Which is nothing, 50watts more is really nothing at all and is very acceptable.

gx-x
Senior Member



Posts: 1517
Joined: 2007-03-18

#5125365 Posted on: 07/20/2015 01:24 AM
that's your personal , unprofessional, uneducated (on the matter) view. AMD certainly went to great lengths to reduce power.

kakarot
Senior Member



Posts: 1121
Joined: 2002-02-21

#5125435 Posted on: 07/20/2015 05:23 AM
Now you want amd to go out of business selling the fury for 400? Video cards have been over 500 bucks for a lot of years for the highest end segment. Look up the 8800ultra release price.


oh man, you can go way further back and see $500+ prices on the high end. Anyone even remember the geforce 2 days? Hell even my sexxxy gf256 was well over $300 lol (I miss those days/abs)

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11809
Joined: 2012-07-20

#5125464 Posted on: 07/20/2015 07:06 AM
Anyone notice that Titan X/980Ti/Fury X/Fury take about same area on wafer? Cca 600mm^2, compared to gtx 680/HD7970's 300/350mm^2.
That is your correlation. It costs more to make such chip, so you have to pay more.

Only wrong thing with pricing is gtx 980 which with 400m^2 did cost too much, but it was priced based on performance because otherwise nVidia would kill sales of many of their cards.

mcfart
Senior Member



Posts: 311
Joined: 2010-05-07

#5125472 Posted on: 07/20/2015 08:04 AM
Even with HBM, AMD still has similar temps and slightly higher power draw then Maxwell...


Imagine a Maxwell card with HBM.....*drools*

10 pages « < 7 8 9 10


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2022