Review: Galax HOF OC Lab DDR4-4400 16 GB
Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup - Round 2 (2021)
ClockTuner v2.1 for Ryzen (CTR) Guide
TRENDnet 5-port Unmanaged 2.5G Switch review
Powercolor RX 6700 XT Hellhound Spectral White review
Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
AMD Confirms It Will Launch Zen 3 This Year - We Haven't Seen the Best From AMD Just yet
AMD for the what .. fifth time this year is confirming that ZEN3 will launch this year. This time the turn goes to AMD Executive Vice President of Computing and Graphics Rick Bergman, who confirmed that we will see the new Zen 3 based processors before the end of the year.
He also stated that we have not yet seen the best that AMD has:
So, what’s next for AMD in the PC space? Well, I cannot share too much, but I can say our high-performance journey continues with our first “Zen 3” Client processor on-track to launch later this year. I will wrap by saying you haven’t seen the best of us yet…
This remark was made during the announcements of the new Ryzen 4000 Desktop APUs. It is interesting to see that AMD reiterates this news so many times, and quite frankly they seem really enthusiast about it, so let's hope it is really good! According to rumors, the processors based on this new architecture would be up to 20% faster in single-core and 15% faster in multi-core, and that is once again a really significant leap.
AMD Confirms ZEN3 and RDNA2 by Late-2020 on Twitter - 04/29/2020 07:03 AM
A bit unusual from AMD, but ZEN3 and RDNA2 based technologies will be released late 2020, AMD confirmed this on twitter. Earlier on a roadmap confirmed that the design phase of Zen 3 is complete and ...
AMD Confirms AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA firmware with a Blog post - 09/10/2019 06:36 PM
Following our story on the AMD AGESA 1.0.0.3 ABBA firmware, AMD just announced a comprehensive update for 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen processor boost behavior, desktop idle behavior, as well as a new monitori...
AMD Confirms that Ryzen CPUs are Immune to SPOILER Exploit - 03/19/2019 08:56 AM
Two weeks ago new vulnerabilities for Intel procs surfaced. The vulnerability was given the name Spoiler and was discovered by the Worcester Polytechnic Institute and the University of Lübeck. It i...
AMD confirms Raven Ridge Vega 11 and halts production Vega Reference Cards - 12/04/2017 10:19 AM
In a recent interview with James Prior, senior product manager at AMD and the guy behind Threadripper mentioned a number of things that are interesting news. First and foremost, Prior mentions that s...
AMD confirms all RYZEN processors can be overclocked - 01/08/2017 10:12 AM
One more for the weekend. I actually already mentioned this bit of in in one of my earlier posts, but it is now confirmed. AMD will release several RYZEN model CPUs at launch. What wasn't confirmed j...
kings
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 2018-09-18
Senior Member
Posts: 158
Joined: 2018-09-18
#5811450 Posted on: 07/23/2020 12:50 PM
Intel's problem is not the design of the architectures. They already have architectures much faster than the current ones, they just cannot use them to the full, because they were designed for the new manufacturing processes.
As 10nm did poorly and 7nm was also delayed, Intel found itself in a situation where the only chance is to continue to squeeze 14nm. When Intel has 10nm working properly or even 7nm, we will see good products from Intel again.
The big question I got is: what is in the design of AMD chips that has intel so flummoxed? Surely it's just a design problem they cannot solve?
Intel's problem is not the design of the architectures. They already have architectures much faster than the current ones, they just cannot use them to the full, because they were designed for the new manufacturing processes.
As 10nm did poorly and 7nm was also delayed, Intel found itself in a situation where the only chance is to continue to squeeze 14nm. When Intel has 10nm working properly or even 7nm, we will see good products from Intel again.
Venix
Senior Member
Posts: 1635
Joined: 2016-08-01
Senior Member
Posts: 1635
Joined: 2016-08-01
#5811453 Posted on: 07/23/2020 01:06 PM
what you people mean struggling on 1080 p ? https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-5-3600xt-review,24.html with a 2080ti on farcry 5 witch is literally the stronger performing tittle with intel the humble 3600 still spits out 120 fps with a 2080 ti on 1080p
with a 2070 /2070s the difference is dropping way down and on higher resolutions disapears on other tittles the diference is on single digit fps .... don't know but 120 fps i would not call it struggling really
what you people mean struggling on 1080 p ? https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/amd-ryzen-5-3600xt-review,24.html with a 2080ti on farcry 5 witch is literally the stronger performing tittle with intel the humble 3600 still spits out 120 fps with a 2080 ti on 1080p
with a 2070 /2070s the difference is dropping way down and on higher resolutions disapears on other tittles the diference is on single digit fps .... don't know but 120 fps i would not call it struggling really
LuismiFC
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2020-06-03
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2020-06-03
#5811454 Posted on: 07/23/2020 01:12 PM
At what resolution? 1080p? Because that is just about the only resolution AMD is struggling at.
I'm sure it'll close the gap some more this go'round....
And I wouldn't even use the word "struggle" at all. I mean, a few FPS less @1080p with a 2080ti?? The other 99.9% real cases is on par with Intel, really good job.
At what resolution? 1080p? Because that is just about the only resolution AMD is struggling at.
I'm sure it'll close the gap some more this go'round....
And I wouldn't even use the word "struggle" at all. I mean, a few FPS less @1080p with a 2080ti?? The other 99.9% real cases is on par with Intel, really good job.
nizzen
Senior Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: 2005-08-05
Senior Member
Posts: 1355
Joined: 2005-08-05
#5811465 Posted on: 07/23/2020 02:05 PM
At what resolution? 1080p? Because that is just about the only resolution AMD is struggling at.
I'm sure it'll close the gap some more this go'round....
1440p is the new 1080p with the new gen gpu's
Beat Intel in "cpu bound" gaming?
First they have to dig hard to beat this in gaming:
At what resolution? 1080p? Because that is just about the only resolution AMD is struggling at.
I'm sure it'll close the gap some more this go'round....
1440p is the new 1080p with the new gen gpu's
Beat Intel in "cpu bound" gaming?
First they have to dig hard to beat this in gaming:
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1160
Joined: 2011-01-11
Chiplets. Intel is still struggling to grasp the concept of how they did it.?!? HAHAHAH
Not sure honestly. I mean I thought AMD was mad for trying it out on ThreadRipper originally. With all of their latency issues along with performance being abysmal....
Now look at them! Knocking walls down today!!