Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2020
Corsair 4000D PC Chassis Review
TeamGroup EX2 SSD 1TB review
Deepcool AS500 air cooler review
Leven JS600 1 TB SATA3 SSD review
ClockTuner for Ryzen v1.1 (CTR) Guide by 1USMUS
Colorful GeForce RTX 3080 iGAME VULCAN review
Corsair HS60 Haptic Headset review
Corsair K60 RGB Pro keyboard review
Deepcool Macube 110 chassis review
AMD Announces RX 5000 Series Graphics processors at Computex - Demos RX 5700
As we all know NAVI is the new family of Radeon GPUs. NAVI is based on 7nm RDNA architecture (Radeon DNA). NAVI will be PCIe Express 4.0 compatible, has a new compute design, new cache-hierarchy and will be reducing latency, lower power. 1.25x perf per clock improvement and 1.5x better power consumption.
During the keynote speech AMD announced the and named the 7nm NAVI based graphics cards the Radeon RX 5000 series products. A card based on NAVI was shown in a live demo and compared against a GeForce RTX 2070 in a direct comparison with the Radeon RX 5700. Strange Brigade. The FPS looked about the same but was mentioned to be roughly 10% faster.
AMD considers Navi as a completely new architecture. No longer GCN, but RDNA. RDNA uses completely redesigned Compute Units, which should significantly increase per-clock performance and efficiency. This includes a new cache structure. The changes are expected to boost Vega's performance by at least 25 percent per cycle ("IPC") and increase efficiency (wattage) by at least 50 percent.
Raytracing was not mentioned in the presentation and the Navi cards do not seem to have any hardware support for it. According to AMD, the Navi architecture will serve as the foundation for video cards for gamers in the coming years. AMD has not yet published any specifications or prices for the cards in the RX 5000 series. The manufacturer will do this during the E3 game fair, via a live stream. AMD announces that NAVI will be launching in July. June 10th there will be a live stream with all details on products, specs and prices.
Navi will debut as Radeon RX 5000 series, with the Radeon RX 5700 series leading initially.
AMD Announces E3 Event & Livestream Unveiling New GamingTechnologies - 05/14/2019 04:11 PM
Today, AMD announced it will host an event and livestream during E3 2019 on Monday, June 10 at 3 p.m. PT. Hosted by The Game Awards creator Geoff Keighley, “Next Horizon Gaming” at...
AMD Announces 2nd Gen Ryzen PRO Mobile Processors - 04/08/2019 03:28 PM
AMD announced the latest additions to its PRO processor lineup: 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen PRO mobile processors with Radeon Vega Graphics and AMD Athlon PRO mobile processors with Radeon Vega Graphics....
CES: AMD announces Radeon VII (Vega at 7nm) - 01/09/2019 07:51 PM
AMD just announced the Radeon VII (seven / 7 aka 7nm). The product is based on 60 Compute units which means times 64 shaders per cluster is 3840 shader processor. That means this is a Vega 64 shrun...
AMD Announces 2nd Gen AMD Ryzen 3000 Series Mobile Processors - 01/06/2019 07:08 PM
Additionally, AMD announced, starting this quarter, gamers, creators, and enthusiasts will be able to install Radeon Software Adrenalin to bring the latest GPU features and game optimizations to all s...
AMD announces new Raise the Game bundle - 11/16/2018 09:19 AM
As you probably have read yesterday in our RX 590 review. AMD has announced a new Raise the Game bundle of AAA+ video game titles for purchasers of select RX Vega, RX 590, RX 580, and RX 570 graphic...
MonstroMart
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Joined: 2006-07-06
Senior Member
Posts: 775
Joined: 2006-07-06
#5673432 Posted on: 05/27/2019 05:23 AM
It actually was slightly faster ~10% than the 2070. That being said Strange Brigade is heavily AMD favored.. this being a new architecture might change that but until I see another game I'm going to assume the card they showed will be around 2070 performance in other games.
Still pretty cool that it's a new architecture tho
What is interesting if true is the 1.5x better power consumption. Performance wise Vega was not that bad. I mean the Vega 56 was just as good as the 1070. The main problem was power consumption and temp (and selling at the same price as nVidia while releasing the card at a later date). If they can address the power consumption and release something in the neighbourhood of the 2080 and 2070 while undercutting nVidia (and forcing them to adjust the price) then i'll be more than happy.
It actually was slightly faster ~10% than the 2070. That being said Strange Brigade is heavily AMD favored.. this being a new architecture might change that but until I see another game I'm going to assume the card they showed will be around 2070 performance in other games.
Still pretty cool that it's a new architecture tho
What is interesting if true is the 1.5x better power consumption. Performance wise Vega was not that bad. I mean the Vega 56 was just as good as the 1070. The main problem was power consumption and temp (and selling at the same price as nVidia while releasing the card at a later date). If they can address the power consumption and release something in the neighbourhood of the 2080 and 2070 while undercutting nVidia (and forcing them to adjust the price) then i'll be more than happy.
__hollywood|meo
Senior Member
Posts: 2979
Joined: 2005-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 2979
Joined: 2005-09-27
#5673443 Posted on: 05/27/2019 05:41 AM
vega56 was better than the 1070 - thats entirely why nvidia released the 1070ti. but yes, power consumption was pretty damn bad for vega, even if undervolted
im half irritated that i have to wait until E3 for actual architecture & model-specific details, but its not that far away
vega56 was better than the 1070 - thats entirely why nvidia released the 1070ti. but yes, power consumption was pretty damn bad for vega, even if undervolted
im half irritated that i have to wait until E3 for actual architecture & model-specific details, but its not that far away
CPC_RedDawn
Senior Member
Posts: 8228
Joined: 2008-01-06
Senior Member
Posts: 8228
Joined: 2008-01-06
#5673446 Posted on: 05/27/2019 05:45 AM
Didn't you guys see that PCIE4.0 3DMark benchmark????
69% better performance over a 2080Ti????
That can't be right, just from a bandwidth upgrade? Going from PCIE2.0 to PCIE3.0 wasn't much different, defo not 69%!??
Didn't you guys see that PCIE4.0 3DMark benchmark????
69% better performance over a 2080Ti????
That can't be right, just from a bandwidth upgrade? Going from PCIE2.0 to PCIE3.0 wasn't much different, defo not 69%!??
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 13085
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 13085
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5673447 Posted on: 05/27/2019 05:46 AM
Didn't you guys see that PCIE4.0 3DMark benchmark????
69% better performance over a 2080Ti????
That can't be right, just from a bandwidth upgrade? Going from PCIE2.0 to PCIE3.0 wasn't much different, defo not 69%!??
It's a benchmark designed to saturate the pci-e bandwidth... there aren't going to be any games in the next 10 years that come close to doing that.
There have been synthetic examples of this with prior PCI-E specs.
Didn't you guys see that PCIE4.0 3DMark benchmark????
69% better performance over a 2080Ti????
That can't be right, just from a bandwidth upgrade? Going from PCIE2.0 to PCIE3.0 wasn't much different, defo not 69%!??
It's a benchmark designed to saturate the pci-e bandwidth... there aren't going to be any games in the next 10 years that come close to doing that.
There have been synthetic examples of this with prior PCI-E specs.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 13085
Joined: 2004-05-16
It actually was slightly faster ~10% than the 2070. That being said Strange Brigade is heavily AMD favored.. this being a new architecture might change that but until I see another game I'm going to assume the card they showed will be around 2070 performance in other games.
Still pretty cool that it's a new architecture tho