Corsair RM1200X SHIFT 1200W PSU Review
Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
AMD 7341:00 - Radeon RX 570 Successor spotted?
In CompuBench a new AMD Radeon Device ID has been spotted. The new entry could be Navi 14, a product that is set to replace products like the Radeon RX 570. The product is paired with 8 gigabytes of graphics memory and would be a good notch faster in OpenCL.
It has been rumored that Navi 14 is either a Polaris respin or NAVI based replacement. Little is known though. The CompuBench entry carries the device ID AMD 7341: 00 and shows 8 gigabytes of graphics memory and might be an AMD answer to the GTX 1650 and GTX 1660. The card should have 1,536 shader units and clock with up to 1,900 megahertz.
Astyanax
Senior Member
Posts: 15722
Joined: 2018-03-21
Senior Member
Posts: 15722
Joined: 2018-03-21
#5701758 Posted on: 08/20/2019 04:52 AM
shit, i misremembered.
it was the Radeon VII i was thinking that the 56 beat in some cases.
shit, i misremembered.
it was the Radeon VII i was thinking that the 56 beat in some cases.
icedman
Senior Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: 2013-02-22
Senior Member
Posts: 1261
Joined: 2013-02-22
#5701855 Posted on: 08/20/2019 10:00 AM
we need more cards in the 200-300$ mark current cards just aren't worth the price to performance they're offering over last gen cards. currently the only option is the 2060 non super and its around 350$ or 270$ for the 1660ti and neither are very appealing cards for the money
we need more cards in the 200-300$ mark current cards just aren't worth the price to performance they're offering over last gen cards. currently the only option is the 2060 non super and its around 350$ or 270$ for the 1660ti and neither are very appealing cards for the money
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 22472
Joined: 2008-07-14
You could say that i guess, but realistically it's filling the Vega 56 in AMD's product stack.
From my view point the RX 5000 series are hopefully taking the RX series out of the "designated cheap/low performance" zone and bringing it back to its former glory without the need of randomly named Fury's and Nanos and Vegas and etc. trying to separate themselves from the RX lineup.
Well, if the rumors of an RX5800 series are true, barring an RX5900 series.... I'd expect the RX5700 series to replace the RX570 and 580, and the RX5800 series to replace Vega 56 and Vega 64. I could be wrong though and the FX5700 series are replacing the RX580 and 590, RX5800 series are replacing Vega (56 and 64). That would leave an RX5600 series to replace the RX560 and 570. Guess we'll find out in due time. Quite honestly, I never found the RX500 series to be worthwhile. The performance gain over the RX400 series just wasn't compelling or sufficient. Even for the old games I play....lol
idk about that, i've seen some vega56 benches that smash the 5700XT
How heavily overclocked was the Vega56 and in what games? According to Hilbert's review of the reference RX5700 and RX5700XT, the Vega56 is upwards of 25% slower than the RX5700.