Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Addlink S90 Lite 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4148
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta3 Download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1
CPU-Z download v2.05
AMD Chipset Drivers Download 5.02.19.2221
GeForce 531.18 WHQL driver download
ReShade download v5.7.0


New Forum Topics
Some GeForce RTX 4070 Graphics cards May get a 16-Pin Power Connection. NVIDIA GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver Download & Discussion Crucial PCIe 5.0 SSD, T700, Impresses with Compact Heatsink and High Speeds Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. who knows how to fix this visual issue (i think it is motherboard) I can not get ANY game to launch at 120hz on my 6700XT Review: ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition NVIDIA Brings Ultra-Realism to Video Games with AI and Path Tracing Technologies GPU Crashing Fake Samsung 980 Pro SSDs on the Rise: Beware of Counterfeit Drives




Guru3D.com » News » AMD 10-core Ryzen 2800X in response to Intel Core i9-9900K?

AMD 10-core Ryzen 2800X in response to Intel Core i9-9900K?

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/10/2018 02:42 PM | source: elchapuzasinformatico | 48 comment(s)
AMD 10-core Ryzen 2800X in response to Intel Core i9-9900K?

Do you remember when Ryzen 2000 (Zen+) launched with the flagship processor being the Ryzen 7 2700X? We all felt that was a little weird, as the previous generation had a Ryzen 7 1800X. In my 2700X review, I already mentioned that AMD might be holding back processors, waiting on Intel to release the Core 9000 series processors.

Well, it's a bit confusing to see really, but a screenshot leaked showing a partially Cinebench score based on a processor called Ryzen R7 2800X. The shocking thing here is that it is listed as being a 10-core processor. The news of this 10-core part surfaced at elchapuzasinformatico and the picture shows clock speeds in Cinebench at 4.00 GHz with a reportedly multi-core score of roughly 2130 points.

  

  

To be brutally honest, the photo is a bit of a clusterfrack to see as 10-cores does not make any sense whatsoever. ZEN+ dies have 8 cores, only a multi-die proc would be able to achieve 10 cores. And even then the core complex is in multitudes of four cores, so 12 cores would be the next logical step. There's also no source mentioned of that photo and the 'R7' entry does not match up as well, as that should read Ryzen 7 2x00X.

So that's enough disclaimers I think, grains of salt included.



AMD 10-core Ryzen 2800X in response to Intel Core i9-9900K?




« Download Display Driver Uninstaller DDU version 18.0.0.0 (Preliminary Realtek and Creative Support) · AMD 10-core Ryzen 2800X in response to Intel Core i9-9900K? · Review: Seagate Barracuda Pro 14TB HDD (the Megalodon has arrived) »

10 pages « < 6 7 8 9 > »


chispy
Senior Member



Posts: 9594
Joined: 2006-10-29

#5583186 Posted on: 09/10/2018 09:31 PM
Not happening , i call it fake ;)

The Reeferman
Senior Member



Posts: 115
Joined: 2013-11-10

#5583199 Posted on: 09/10/2018 09:59 PM
My opinion is that Ryzen FEELS snappier/smoother than Intel, but if you care only about bigger numbers, you should be a theoretical mathematician in the first place.
Intel is a stuttery and choppy and hiccups mess (did you notice your cursor stops moving for 1 second for absolutely no reason ? No such thing on AMD). No idea why all Intel SKUs since the beginning of time have this problem.
I transcode movies with 50% CPU utilization on AMD while playing games and nothing changes about the game, no more input lag like it does on Intel, no blocking like it does on Intel, no lockups like it does on Intel, no audio crackle like it does on Intel. You cannot fu****g listen to music on some Intel SKUs without audio crackle while playing certain games.
AMD feels like it doesn't max out when it reaches 100% per core.

I recognize that too.

Deleted member 213629
Unregistered



#5583211 Posted on: 09/10/2018 10:33 PM
I've analysed many of these posts and ... *uhh huh --- sniff sniff* ... oh boy... flame on people....

;) :rolleyes:

H83
Senior Member



Posts: 4577
Joined: 2009-09-08

#5583212 Posted on: 09/10/2018 10:35 PM
I only need 11.


I want one with 13 cores...

wavetrex
Senior Member



Posts: 1768
Joined: 2008-07-16

#5583270 Posted on: 09/11/2018 02:22 AM
My special-issue software crashes if the CPU doesn't have exactly 1.21 Jiga-Cores.

Come on VIA, I know you can do it !

10 pages « < 6 7 8 9 > »


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023