TRENDnet 5-port Unmanaged 2.5G Switch review
Powercolor RX 6700 XT Hellhound Spectral White review
Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
Acer Predator Apollo and Predator Talos DRAM Review
ASUS TUF Z590-Plus WIFI review
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Alleged 3DMark scores of AMD Radeon RX 6800XT
Multiple sources now published 3DMark results of an alleged AMD Radeon RX 6800XT showing benchmark results at a 4k resolution. These results are compared to the Geforce RTX 3080 from NVIDIA.
Though most scores you see leaked online are a little too perfect with their nicely rounded numbers, it doesn't mean that there's any merit to them. These results have not yet been confirmed and may also be affected by drivers. So take this with a grain of salt. Independent results for game performance, are not yet available. Overall we see the alleged Radeon RX 6800XT battling with an RTX 3080, and that has been expected for a while now. The scores floating on the web originate from the typically leaking website, however one tweet and some results from wccftech jump out.
RX 6800XT would perform up to 22 percent better in Firestrike Ultra 4K. In TimeSpy the difference seems smaller again and in ray tracing benchmarks the RTX 3080 seems to outperform AMD's upcoming video card.
Alleged 3DMark results from the RX 6800XT. Image via Wccftech
The developer of the CapframeX posted initial performance figures for the Big Navi, without confirming which SKU that is. The SKU would allegedly offer 8% better performance than RTX 3080 in Fire Strike Ultra, a DirectX 11 based 4K benchmark.
Now such perfect numbers do not exist in benchmark land, but indicative we can place them in our chart as that 3080 closely matches our charts. And guys, the chart below this is a hypothetical okay?
Alleged Intel Alder Lake CPU photo surfaces online - 10/15/2020 09:22 AM
Yeah, that's the one with a baffling 1700 pins (LGA100), the processor has dimensions of 37.5x45mm and is bigger than most Intel CPUs....
Here is an alleged photo of AMD Radeon Big Navi Radeon RX 6000 - 09/10/2020 08:53 AM
Yesterday Lisa Su from AMD announced that big Navi is going to be announced next month (and there have been far too many announcements about announcements). But meanwhile, in Asia, there's always a g...
First Alleged Benchmark Results GeForce RTX 3080 Surface - 09/09/2020 06:26 PM
Over in Asia a data-set for benchmarks the GeForce RTX 3080 has leaked online. The results are not 100% clear but would be based on the card paired with a system based on a Core i9 10900K processor....
Photos of Alleged GeForce RTX 3090 Ampere PCB surface - 08/14/2020 10:52 AM
It won't be much longer before NVIDIA is going to announce their new series of GPUs based on Ampere architecture. September 1st is the day of some announcement. As expected we'll see more and more l...
Alleged AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT pops up in 3DMark - Faster than Vega 56 - 12/23/2019 09:22 AM
A new an unknown graphics card has surfaced on the trenches of the UL ORB, again spotted bu Redditor u/_rogame. The these here is that it is the Radeon RX 5600, and if correct, this puppy could be ma...
H83
Senior Member
Posts: 3423
Joined: 2009-09-08
Senior Member
Posts: 3423
Joined: 2009-09-08
#5846638 Posted on: 10/26/2020 04:10 PM
Need benchies and i need them now!
Need benchies and i need them now!
HARDRESET
Senior Member
Posts: 768
Joined: 2013-07-17
Senior Member
Posts: 768
Joined: 2013-07-17
#5846717 Posted on: 10/26/2020 08:07 PM
"Fake" who said that♀️, that famous one word , a few more days all the faking and baking will be done
"Fake" who said that♀️, that famous one word , a few more days all the faking and baking will be done
A M D BugBear
Senior Member
Posts: 3585
Joined: 2005-09-27
Senior Member
Posts: 3585
Joined: 2005-09-27
#5846790 Posted on: 10/26/2020 11:50 PM
Very interesting.
Can't wait for results, along with RTX 3070, Thanks a bunch for sharing.
Very interesting.
Can't wait for results, along with RTX 3070, Thanks a bunch for sharing.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11803
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11803
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5846809 Posted on: 10/27/2020 01:29 AM
Well, if you play DX-R games exclusively, you'll know which card is better for you very soon. But I live in real world. My steam library has over 370 games. Some have DX-R features as "coming soon TM". None has them.
Same applies to my other platforms.
And my advice will remain same. That's for people to buy product where they can get most fps on average of their games.
Do you remember VLIW4 architecture? (That little failure in terms of HD69X0.)
Very good at DX11 (at time), suffered at DX9 which was everywhere around while DX11 had few titles...
VLIW4 was replaced by GCN almost immediately for good reason. It did win only in newer DX11 titles and lost in most of existing ones.
Cards bought for some misplaced trust in future outlook always fail to deliver. Exception is GTX 680 4GB vs 2GB. Still, it was not exactly strong GPU at time 2GB started to stutter in games.
Very long time ago, I bought DX10 card to play one particular game, to have new effects, as it was visually ahead of time. What a waste that was.
It's hard to say what games will be using raytracing but one of the biggest games of the season(perhaps for years to come?) Cyberpunk 2077 will be using it very heavily so even if you can get better frames sans RT on a 6800XT it won't matter much if the 3080 smashes it with RT on. Still if the benches are true big Navi could be the ticket if the price is right.
Well, if you play DX-R games exclusively, you'll know which card is better for you very soon. But I live in real world. My steam library has over 370 games. Some have DX-R features as "coming soon TM". None has them.
Same applies to my other platforms.
And my advice will remain same. That's for people to buy product where they can get most fps on average of their games.
Do you remember VLIW4 architecture? (That little failure in terms of HD69X0.)
Very good at DX11 (at time), suffered at DX9 which was everywhere around while DX11 had few titles...
VLIW4 was replaced by GCN almost immediately for good reason. It did win only in newer DX11 titles and lost in most of existing ones.
Cards bought for some misplaced trust in future outlook always fail to deliver. Exception is GTX 680 4GB vs 2GB. Still, it was not exactly strong GPU at time 2GB started to stutter in games.
Very long time ago, I bought DX10 card to play one particular game, to have new effects, as it was visually ahead of time. What a waste that was.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: 2006-10-21
Good thinking. Maybe 3080 should reduce prices based on information above, because it has inferior rasterization capabilities which matter in 99.9...% of existing games. And ~99% of upcoming games within next 12~24 months. And because it provides inferior image quality through use of "proprietary performance improving technique" called DLSS.
Or what about letting those companies set prices they want. And let Free Market do what it is best at.
It's hard to say what games will be using raytracing but one of the biggest games of the season(perhaps for years to come?) Cyberpunk 2077 will be using it very heavily so even if you can get better frames sans RT on a 6800XT it won't matter much if the 3080 smashes it with RT on. Still if the benches are true big Navi could be the ticket if the price is right.