TRENDnet 5-port Unmanaged 2.5G Switch review
Powercolor RX 6700 XT Hellhound Spectral White review
Resident Evil Village: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Enermax LIQMAX III aRGB 240mm review
PCIe Resizable BAR Performance AMD and NVIDIA benchmarks
Guru3D Rig of the Month - April 2021
Intel Core i7 11700KF processor review
Acer Predator Apollo and Predator Talos DRAM Review
ASUS TUF Z590-Plus WIFI review
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Alleged 3DMark scores of AMD Radeon RX 6800XT
Multiple sources now published 3DMark results of an alleged AMD Radeon RX 6800XT showing benchmark results at a 4k resolution. These results are compared to the Geforce RTX 3080 from NVIDIA.
Though most scores you see leaked online are a little too perfect with their nicely rounded numbers, it doesn't mean that there's any merit to them. These results have not yet been confirmed and may also be affected by drivers. So take this with a grain of salt. Independent results for game performance, are not yet available. Overall we see the alleged Radeon RX 6800XT battling with an RTX 3080, and that has been expected for a while now. The scores floating on the web originate from the typically leaking website, however one tweet and some results from wccftech jump out.
RX 6800XT would perform up to 22 percent better in Firestrike Ultra 4K. In TimeSpy the difference seems smaller again and in ray tracing benchmarks the RTX 3080 seems to outperform AMD's upcoming video card.
Alleged 3DMark results from the RX 6800XT. Image via Wccftech
The developer of the CapframeX posted initial performance figures for the Big Navi, without confirming which SKU that is. The SKU would allegedly offer 8% better performance than RTX 3080 in Fire Strike Ultra, a DirectX 11 based 4K benchmark.
Now such perfect numbers do not exist in benchmark land, but indicative we can place them in our chart as that 3080 closely matches our charts. And guys, the chart below this is a hypothetical okay?
Alleged Intel Alder Lake CPU photo surfaces online - 10/15/2020 09:22 AM
Yeah, that's the one with a baffling 1700 pins (LGA100), the processor has dimensions of 37.5x45mm and is bigger than most Intel CPUs....
Here is an alleged photo of AMD Radeon Big Navi Radeon RX 6000 - 09/10/2020 08:53 AM
Yesterday Lisa Su from AMD announced that big Navi is going to be announced next month (and there have been far too many announcements about announcements). But meanwhile, in Asia, there's always a g...
First Alleged Benchmark Results GeForce RTX 3080 Surface - 09/09/2020 06:26 PM
Over in Asia a data-set for benchmarks the GeForce RTX 3080 has leaked online. The results are not 100% clear but would be based on the card paired with a system based on a Core i9 10900K processor....
Photos of Alleged GeForce RTX 3090 Ampere PCB surface - 08/14/2020 10:52 AM
It won't be much longer before NVIDIA is going to announce their new series of GPUs based on Ampere architecture. September 1st is the day of some announcement. As expected we'll see more and more l...
Alleged AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT pops up in 3DMark - Faster than Vega 56 - 12/23/2019 09:22 AM
A new an unknown graphics card has surfaced on the trenches of the UL ORB, again spotted bu Redditor u/_rogame. The these here is that it is the Radeon RX 5600, and if correct, this puppy could be ma...
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11803
Joined: 2012-07-20
Senior Member
Posts: 11803
Joined: 2012-07-20
#5846606 Posted on: 10/26/2020 01:57 PM
Good thinking. Maybe 3080 should reduce prices based on information above, because it has inferior rasterization capabilities which matter in 99.9...% of existing games. And ~99% of upcoming games within next 12~24 months. And because it provides inferior image quality through use of "proprietary performance improving technique" called DLSS.
Or what about letting those companies set prices they want. And let Free Market do what it is best at.
I this is true it better be cheaper than a 3080 because of the lack of DLSS(presumably) and poorer raytracing. Or I guess they would charge the same because they can?
Good thinking. Maybe 3080 should reduce prices based on information above, because it has inferior rasterization capabilities which matter in 99.9...% of existing games. And ~99% of upcoming games within next 12~24 months. And because it provides inferior image quality through use of "proprietary performance improving technique" called DLSS.
Or what about letting those companies set prices they want. And let Free Market do what it is best at.
TalentX
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Joined: 2019-04-10
Senior Member
Posts: 119
Joined: 2019-04-10
#5846610 Posted on: 10/26/2020 02:06 PM
I suspect AMD will price these the same as Nvidia counterparts (3080).
If you can't buy the 3080, why price Navi cheaper?
And it will sell like hot cakes!
While I would agree with this in general, there is still a good reason not to though.
Customer loyalty in terms of fair-price-policy.
I suspect AMD will price these the same as Nvidia counterparts (3080).
If you can't buy the 3080, why price Navi cheaper?
And it will sell like hot cakes!
While I would agree with this in general, there is still a good reason not to though.
Customer loyalty in terms of fair-price-policy.
mackintosh
Senior Member
Posts: 374
Joined: 2012-11-28
Senior Member
Posts: 374
Joined: 2012-11-28
#5846614 Posted on: 10/26/2020 02:17 PM
I imagine they will price them competitively this generation, and increase their pricing once they gain market share, much like they've done with Ryzen. Unless they do a total dick move and just try to cash in on 3000-series supply woes. That however won't win them any favours.
I imagine they will price them competitively this generation, and increase their pricing once they gain market share, much like they've done with Ryzen. Unless they do a total dick move and just try to cash in on 3000-series supply woes. That however won't win them any favours.
Supertribble
Senior Member
Posts: 869
Joined: 2011-07-11
Senior Member
Posts: 869
Joined: 2011-07-11
#5846622 Posted on: 10/26/2020 03:03 PM
Yeah the 6900XT looks real tasty if these numbers on the 6800XT are correct. I don't think the biggest Navi will be much less than £1200, though, but I'd like to be surprised with a lower price. 1K would be about the limit I would be willing to spend on a GPU but saying that the 6800XT is looking like a good option, and in my opinion a better option than the 3080, again, if the numbers in the leak are close to accurate.
Well, if this is true - I'm starting to look forward to the 6900xt.
Yeah the 6900XT looks real tasty if these numbers on the 6800XT are correct. I don't think the biggest Navi will be much less than £1200, though, but I'd like to be surprised with a lower price. 1K would be about the limit I would be willing to spend on a GPU but saying that the 6800XT is looking like a good option, and in my opinion a better option than the 3080, again, if the numbers in the leak are close to accurate.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: 2006-10-21
I this is true it better be cheaper than a 3080 because of the lack of DLSS(presumably) and poorer raytracing. Or I guess they would charge the same because they can?