G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 processor review
Advanced Warfare - PC Recommended Requirements
Next to the minimum we requirements we shared, the Steam store page now offers the recommended requirements for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Activision recommends 8GB of RAM, an i5-2500K (that is the minimum for Assassin's Creed: Unity), and a graphics card with 4GB of VRAM.
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare – PC Recommended Requirements:
- OS: Windows 7 64-Bit / Windows 8 64-Bit / Windows 8.1 64-Bit
- Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz
- Memory: 8 GB RAM
- Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 @ 4GB
- DirectX: Version 11
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 55 GB available space
- Sound Card: 100% DirectX 9.0c Compatible 16-bit
- Additional Notes: Field of View ranges from 65deg-90deg.
« Google To Debut Inbox As New Gmail Alternative · Advanced Warfare - PC Recommended Requirements
· AMD price Cuts and Game Bundles For Desktop APUs »
Activision releases System Requirements Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare - 10/20/2014 06:24 PM
The minimum PC specs for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare have been shared by Activision. Typically indicative of the rendering engine. minimum specs will be an Intel Core i3-530 at 2,93GHz or AMD Phe...
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare - Launch Trailer - 10/20/2014 09:41 AM
The official Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare gameplay launch trailer has arrived, despite the game not coming out for another couple of weeks. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is planned for a November 4...
CoD: Advanced Warfare - Momentum MP Mode Info - 09/17/2014 09:39 AM
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare developer Sledgehammer Games continues to reveal more details about the multiplayer portion of the game. Now we get a first look at a mode that's inspired by World at W...
CoD: Advanced Warfare - Deep Dive MP Trailer - 09/04/2014 08:23 AM
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Multiplayer is set to deliver one of the most game changing experiences in franchise history. Take a closer look at some of the new Multiplayer features, including exosk...
CoD: Advanced Warfare - Official MP Trailer - 08/12/2014 07:56 AM
Activision has released the first official MP trailer for Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. As the publisher noted, the core movement system is fundamentally changed with exoskeleton technology, creatin...
NamelesONEMail
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2013-01-10
Member
Posts: 35
Joined: 2013-01-10
#4943725 Posted on: 10/23/2014 08:38 PM
Some of you people are a disgrace to the gaming comunity.
You complain non-stop that the graphics are bad, not worthy of 2014 or have requirements that are "too high". How in gods name are the requirements too high ? That 8GB of RAM is nothing .. in my sh***y country where the VAT (tax) is 24%(for anything we buy - especially electronics) and prices are in euro's (100 dollars in america is 100 euro's here + 24% extra) you can buy 8GB DDR3 Kingston Fury 1600 CL9 for 110 dollars. As for 4GB of VRAM I bet that's probably with like x8 AA which you don't even need and 4GB VRAM cards have been around since the 670/680 days so stop crying. A cpu ? a quad core i5 2500k(or newer models) which is more than enough for games costs like 150-200 dollars.
You can pretty much game quite confortably on a 1000-1250$ PC so stop crying.
Its the fault of people like you complaing that a 2014 game doesen't play maxed out on a dual core CPU , 1-2GB VRAM GPU and 2-4GB RAM ... people like you are one of the main reasons why PC games are held back. Instead of expecting a 2014 game to need high end 2014 hardware to be maxed out you cry and demand lower requirements.
A game for the PC should be made for high end hardware that came out in the same year it is released in and not lower the settings to cater to people that have lower configs. That's why they have low-mid-high-ultra settings on most games ffs. Nobody is forcing you to play it on ultra if you have a 10 year old PC.
ANALOGY TIME: You want to ice skate like the pro's ? you need similar equipment which costs a lot more than the cheap equipment ... you don't start complaing that the best the field(sports,racing ... gaming) has to offer is too demanding on your wallet and try and get the organizers of ice skating to make the pro's use cheap equipment. Or maybe you do ... who knows.
PS: from all the gameplay videos out there this new COD actually seems to have good graphics so i5 2500k 8GB RAM and 4GB VRAM are perfectly reasonable requirements for such a game. NOW, the 6GB VRAM Shadow of Mordor was oficially demanding , THAT WAS TOO HIGH REQUIREMENTS. The Evil Within as well high too high requirements for the graphics it had and that "movie experience" the black bars which should have meant less to process.
Although, strangely on 2560x1440 with 95% set to max the game was only using 1.9GB VRAM out of my 3GB 780 ... Shadow of Mordor with all Max except ULTRA textures was using 2.8-2.9GB VRAM as well so nowhere near that 6GB Mark.
Some of you people are a disgrace to the gaming comunity.
You complain non-stop that the graphics are bad, not worthy of 2014 or have requirements that are "too high". How in gods name are the requirements too high ? That 8GB of RAM is nothing .. in my sh***y country where the VAT (tax) is 24%(for anything we buy - especially electronics) and prices are in euro's (100 dollars in america is 100 euro's here + 24% extra) you can buy 8GB DDR3 Kingston Fury 1600 CL9 for 110 dollars. As for 4GB of VRAM I bet that's probably with like x8 AA which you don't even need and 4GB VRAM cards have been around since the 670/680 days so stop crying. A cpu ? a quad core i5 2500k(or newer models) which is more than enough for games costs like 150-200 dollars.
You can pretty much game quite confortably on a 1000-1250$ PC so stop crying.
Its the fault of people like you complaing that a 2014 game doesen't play maxed out on a dual core CPU , 1-2GB VRAM GPU and 2-4GB RAM ... people like you are one of the main reasons why PC games are held back. Instead of expecting a 2014 game to need high end 2014 hardware to be maxed out you cry and demand lower requirements.
A game for the PC should be made for high end hardware that came out in the same year it is released in and not lower the settings to cater to people that have lower configs. That's why they have low-mid-high-ultra settings on most games ffs. Nobody is forcing you to play it on ultra if you have a 10 year old PC.
ANALOGY TIME: You want to ice skate like the pro's ? you need similar equipment which costs a lot more than the cheap equipment ... you don't start complaing that the best the field(sports,racing ... gaming) has to offer is too demanding on your wallet and try and get the organizers of ice skating to make the pro's use cheap equipment. Or maybe you do ... who knows.
PS: from all the gameplay videos out there this new COD actually seems to have good graphics so i5 2500k 8GB RAM and 4GB VRAM are perfectly reasonable requirements for such a game. NOW, the 6GB VRAM Shadow of Mordor was oficially demanding , THAT WAS TOO HIGH REQUIREMENTS. The Evil Within as well high too high requirements for the graphics it had and that "movie experience" the black bars which should have meant less to process.
Although, strangely on 2560x1440 with 95% set to max the game was only using 1.9GB VRAM out of my 3GB 780 ... Shadow of Mordor with all Max except ULTRA textures was using 2.8-2.9GB VRAM as well so nowhere near that 6GB Mark.
Serial T.
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 2010-04-15
Member
Posts: 46
Joined: 2010-04-15
#4943729 Posted on: 10/23/2014 08:44 PM
I know people buy and play these games for the multi-player, but will this one have more than a 6 hour single-player campaign for a change.
I know people buy and play these games for the multi-player, but will this one have more than a 6 hour single-player campaign for a change.

thatguy91
Senior Member
Posts: 6640
Joined: 2010-08-27
Senior Member
Posts: 6640
Joined: 2010-08-27
#4943817 Posted on: 10/23/2014 11:04 PM
Whilst I do agree 8 GB of RAM isn't over the top, I don't want see 8 GB coming the norm if it is a result of poor coding efficiency.
4 GB of VRAM is still a lot, most cards don't have 4 GB. If that was a valid point of argue, then the Asus GTX 780 DirectCU II video card that you have must be pretty crappy, it only has 3 GB.
Yes it's true some people b!tch about everything, but in this case they have a valid argument if it is caused by a lack of coding efficiency. We're all assuming that the 4 GB is a result of antialiasing, but what if it isn't? The recommended system doesn't necessarily mean they've maxed out all the settings in game.
That 8GB of RAM is nothing
Whilst I do agree 8 GB of RAM isn't over the top, I don't want see 8 GB coming the norm if it is a result of poor coding efficiency.
As for 4GB of VRAM I bet that's probably with like x8 AA which you don't even need and 4GB VRAM cards have been around since the 670/680 days so stop crying.
4 GB of VRAM is still a lot, most cards don't have 4 GB. If that was a valid point of argue, then the Asus GTX 780 DirectCU II video card that you have must be pretty crappy, it only has 3 GB.
Yes it's true some people b!tch about everything, but in this case they have a valid argument if it is caused by a lack of coding efficiency. We're all assuming that the 4 GB is a result of antialiasing, but what if it isn't? The recommended system doesn't necessarily mean they've maxed out all the settings in game.
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 7411
Joined: 2006-09-24
Senior Member
Posts: 7411
Joined: 2006-09-24
#4944013 Posted on: 10/24/2014 08:43 AM
asscreed unity needs 8gb RAM and 3gb vram
recommended gpu 780 and 290x recommended cpu 3770. So good!
asscreed unity needs 8gb RAM and 3gb vram

Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Posts: 16
Joined: 2005-05-20
Lol, all these ridiculous artificial requirements for such a mediocore looking game...