4GB VRAM isn't cutting it anymore says AMD
Well, if AMD says it. In my reviews I've been telling for a year or two now that 4 GB VRAM on graphics cards is barely enough in this day and age, and only up-to a gaming resolution of 1920x1080. AMD just posted a blog where they feel the age of a 4GB graphics card has passed.
AMD on its blog calls it in a writeup 'Game Beyond 4 GB', where they conclude testing their 4 GB RX 5500XT & 8 GB RX 5500XT to see how much of a difference VRAM can make on gaming performance. Tested on multiple games and 1080p high/ultra settings an 8 GB card performs almost 20% better than its 4 GB counterpart, which is not unheard of if you tick all the game setting boxes, textures eat memory.
-- AMD -- A few of the newer AAA games benefit greatly from having more VRAM available to store assets needed, play at higher resolutions, and to enable the latest visual effects. For those looking at making sure they have enough Graphics memory for games that are pushing the limits of 4GB, AMD RadeonTM RX graphics cards provide a wide set of solutions in 6GB or 8GB capabilities that include: RadeonTM RX 570, RX 580, RX 590, and RX 5000 Series GPUs.
Recent releases have shown marked performance increases when switching from a RadeonTM 5500 XT 4GB to a RadeonTM 5500 XT 8GB. In DOOM Eternal, the 8GB card runs the game at Ultra Nightmare settings at 75FPS (1080p), while the 4GB card can’t apply the graphics settings with that level of VRAM1. Looking at titles such as Borderlands 3, Call of Duty Modern Warfare, Forza Horizon 4, Ghost Recon Breakpoint, and Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus, there is a performance improvement on average of up to 19% across these games when using the same card and increasing the amount of VRAM from 4GB to 8GB2. AMD is leading the industry at providing gamers with high VRAM graphics solutions across the entire product offering. Competitive products at a similar entry level price-point are offering up to a maximum of 4GB of VRAM, which is evidently not enough for todays games. Go Beyond 4GB of Video Memory to Crank Up your settings. Play on RadeonTM RX Series GPUs with 6GB or 8GB of VRAM and enjoy gaming at Max settings.
Nvidia Releases Quadro M6000 and it has 24GB vram - 03/22/2016 04:55 PM
Nvidia released and updated the Quadro M6000, the new version sits in their Pro product line and now has been fitted with an amazing 24 GB of video memory....
ZOTAC GeForce GTX 960 AMP! Edition with 4GB VRAM - 03/11/2015 05:32 AM
Okay, one more. Zotac as well has now injected 4GB version into their GeForce GTX 960 range. The ZOTAC GeForce GTX 960 AMP! Edition is a high-performance graphics card designed with gamers in mind....
MSI launches GTX 960 GAMING with 4GB VRAM - 03/10/2015 04:05 PM
MSI is excited to announce the new GTX 960 GAMING 4G, a sturdy new member of the MSI GAMING graphics cards lineup. This new card is equipped with 4GB of GDDR5 memory....
Senior Member
Posts: 5403
Joined: 2007-05-05
Neither do I unless there is something annoying added with a setting, like the mentioned build in fxaa in quite a few games.
FFXIV as example has a lot of shimmering going on when FXAA is enabled, especially with the ground textures.
Senior Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2009-08-19
In this case AMD is right. A GTX 1060 with 6GB VRAM is absolute bare minimum if you want to game on high settings at 1080p or 1440p. If you want Ultra High graphics settings, even that card would struggle.
Senior Member
Posts: 18857
Joined: 2008-08-28
I think there will be a hefty vram usage increase when ray tracing gets into the games.
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: 2015-06-17
Clearly, you do not know meaning of word "clearly".
TPU database says that aggregate performance across many games of 5500 XT is 2% slower than 1650 Super at 1080p. Considering additional 4GB of GDDR6, difference in power draw is rather negligible.
Maybe I don't know what that word means, but if I had to choose between same priced cards with about same performance, with 4gb vram, I would choose one with better drivers, better memory compression and currently better PCIe connectivity.That is definitively not 5500XT. Also 8gb versions are more expensive and at that point, I would go with 1660S since there is no real difference in price/$ either.
But what would I know, I am probably nvidia fanboy for being realistic...
Senior Member
Posts: 1332
Joined: 2006-10-21
Depends on game engine and what Ultra covers, shadows, anti aliasing, ray tracing and other settings can have a huge impact on visual quality.
Some games so much that a performance hungry setting is best to have completely off to avoid flickering caused by using a lower quality.
Or when some games only offer low quality methods like fxaa, I tend to disable fxaa in most games these days, since it tends to get really annoying while playing, rather a bit of aliasing than the shimmer it adds under movement.
I've never been one to back off settings if my card is capable of using them. Of course if I had say a 4gb 1050Ti (like my laptop) it would not be running hi res textures or FXAA and what not compared to my gaming rigs 2070s.