Fractal Design Focus 2 chassis review
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
3DMark Time Spy Result shows Radeon RX 5700 XT close to GeForce RTX 2070
You can tell that AMD has been sending around NAVI samples, as hey, how difficult can it be to not leak a result. Regardless, somebody did do just that and posted a Time Spy run, and the score did not dissapoint.
The guys of WCCFTech posted an entry from the 3DMark Time Spy database. The specific card scores 8575 points with a GPU score of 8719 and 7843 CPU points. That matches up with their results of the GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition with 8901 points. Vega 64 scored 7427 so the thesis is that the generic device will be the Radeon RX 5700 XT. The entry, which has been tested with a Core i7 8700K was removed from the database, which kind of confirms as well, it is a product under embargo.
AMD Radeon RX 590 Spotted in 3DMark Time Spy? - 10/15/2018 03:35 PM
Man, what are the odds of that, an Alleged AMD Radeon RX 590 has surfaced in the 3DMark results browser 24 hours prior to an NVIDIA RTX 2070 Embargo? The 12nm Polaris is gossipped to be released soon...
GeForce RTX 2080 3DMark Time Spy and Fire Strike scores leak - 09/14/2018 05:57 PM
You know, I think it took less than an hour before Time Spy benchmarks leaked on the RTX 2080 after NVIDIA released a driver. Just wow, as that was even before I had a chance to download the driver my...
3DMark Time Spy Raytracing Benchmark Update To Arrive Next Month - 08/24/2018 05:07 PM
Raytracing, or for us in specific, DirectX Raytracing is going to be a popular topic for the times to come. NVIDIA just announced their GeForce 2070, 2080 and 2080 Ti with Raytracing cores. Meanwhile,...
Professional overclocker finds a way to cheat benchmarks like 3DMark TimeSpy - 01/25/2018 09:03 PM
Pro overclocker Ronaldo Buassali, working together with GALAX has published a video in which he shows a way to hide driver settings modifications. This results in false higher end scores. The issue i...
3DMark Time Spy Extreme to be released - updated towards 4K DirectX 12 - 10/02/2017 05:16 PM
Futuremark just provided a new build of 3DMark Time Spy Extreme to media. The download binaries cannot be released just yet but they will update the benchmark with an ultra HD test of Time Spy....
Crazy Joe
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 2016-11-29
Member
Posts: 97
Joined: 2016-11-29
#5685226 Posted on: 06/28/2019 01:54 PM
How is a GPU score of 8719 surpassing a score of 8901? Am i missing something?
How is a GPU score of 8719 surpassing a score of 8901? Am i missing something?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 44374
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 44374
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5685234 Posted on: 06/28/2019 02:29 PM
Whoops, I must have had another test result in mind
How is a GPU score of 8719 surpassing a score of 8901? Am i missing something?
Whoops, I must have had another test result in mind
Kaarme
Senior Member
Posts: 2980
Joined: 2013-03-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2980
Joined: 2013-03-10
#5685255 Posted on: 06/28/2019 03:26 PM
Yeah, because actual game benchmarks only tell about that particular game, or at most the particular engine, performance as well. When reading the long Guru3D reviews, you see AMD/Nvidia cards that are close enough to each other outperform the other or lose to the other purely depending on the game. Only true monsters like 2080 Ti leave all other cards to eat the dust unequivocally. In other words, you only get a very rough general feeling from any one performance measurement (unless you are only buying a card to play a specific title and find that title included in a review). They are still highly useful, nonetheless, especially when you see all of the tests.
Be different in games i think, these kind of benchmarks are not indicative of gaming performance.
Yeah, because actual game benchmarks only tell about that particular game, or at most the particular engine, performance as well. When reading the long Guru3D reviews, you see AMD/Nvidia cards that are close enough to each other outperform the other or lose to the other purely depending on the game. Only true monsters like 2080 Ti leave all other cards to eat the dust unequivocally. In other words, you only get a very rough general feeling from any one performance measurement (unless you are only buying a card to play a specific title and find that title included in a review). They are still highly useful, nonetheless, especially when you see all of the tests.
Goiur
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2009-04-29
Senior Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2009-04-29
#5685260 Posted on: 06/28/2019 03:32 PM
SPOILER ALERTTTTT
Whoops, I must have had another test result in mind
SPOILER ALERTTTTT
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: 2019-05-24
So 1% faster than my Vega 64 LC @ +50 power 1100 hbm2 clock.
Graphics Test 1 57.85 fps
Graphics Test 2 45.67 fps
Be different in games i think, these kind of benchmarks are not indicative of gaming performance.