Guru3D Thermal Paste Roundup 2019
Back-to-school Microsoft Office 2016 $18 Win 10 Pro $12
TeamGroup T-Force Vulcan 1TB SSD Review
Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
32-core Intel Xeon results surface in Geekbench
The first results of a 32-core Intel Xeon processor have surfaced in Geekbench. Presumably this would be Skylake-EP from the pending Purley-platform. Intel earlier on indicated that this platform would get 'only' 28 cores.
The results for the 165 Watt 32-core and 64-threaded processor are roughly 4000 points for a single core and 50000 points for the multi-core score. The base clock frequency per core would be 2.1 GHz, the results however indicate 2.3 GHz.
Purley is the successor to the Nehalem architecture, a platform based on motherboard chipset and thus the processor series. The processor platform will come enable six-channels DDR4, and AVX 512 instruction set and a new 100G OmniPath interconnect. Purley will support for no less than 8 processor sockets and will come with Cannonlake graphics and FPGA integration. The PCH is designed under code-name Lewisburg and it'll ship with new Ethernet controllers, these seem to be 10Gbps.
The Purley platform is tied towards a Socket LGA 3647. This entails twelve DDR4 (384-bit wide) slots (no joke) considering this processor has a six channel memory controller.
AMD Previews Naples - The 32-core Server Processor with 8 channel memory - 03/07/2017 09:11 PM
AMD today took a significant step into the server and datacenter market with its most detailed look yet at the upcoming high-performance CPU for servers, codenamed "Naples". Purpose-built...
AMD Naples 32-core Zen-Processors photos - 12/11/2016 11:16 AM
AMD next year will release the Naples server CPU. This is a model with an amazing 32 cores and 64 threads, and is based on Zen architecture. AMD has the means to seriously compete with Intel in the se...
AMD shows off 32-core Bulldozer server - 06/23/2011 10:35 AM
AMD demonstrated a 32-core Bulldozer server at the International Supercomputing Conference (ISC) as the Inq reports: At AMD's ISC stand one could find several 2U and 4U servers built with older Opter...
KingK76
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2009-12-14
Member
Posts: 91
Joined: 2009-12-14
#5409853 Posted on: 03/20/2017 05:58 PM
I'm a little confused... i haven't used "geekbench" before but i have a question about the scores. I know when i use Cinebench that it also gives "single" and "multi" threaded scores. And those scores scale fairly evenly with the addition of extra cores (like 125 single threaded and 790 for a 4 core 8 threaded CPU. So roughly 7-8x the single threaded score for a 8 thread CPU.). Why then with a 64 threaded CPU is the "multi thread" score only around 13x higher then the "single threaded" score on Geekbench? I admit tjis may be viewed as a "noob" like question but i don't really care. Can somone explain it to me? Thanks.
I'm a little confused... i haven't used "geekbench" before but i have a question about the scores. I know when i use Cinebench that it also gives "single" and "multi" threaded scores. And those scores scale fairly evenly with the addition of extra cores (like 125 single threaded and 790 for a 4 core 8 threaded CPU. So roughly 7-8x the single threaded score for a 8 thread CPU.). Why then with a 64 threaded CPU is the "multi thread" score only around 13x higher then the "single threaded" score on Geekbench? I admit tjis may be viewed as a "noob" like question but i don't really care. Can somone explain it to me? Thanks.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35733
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35733
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5409856 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:05 PM
4000 single core score for 2300mhz?
Even if that's base with a turbo of 2900~ that is seriously impressive considering single core 7700k gets 4400~ with 4500mhz
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
4000 single core score for 2300mhz?
Even if that's base with a turbo of 2900~ that is seriously impressive considering single core 7700k gets 4400~ with 4500mhz
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
Undying
Senior Member
Posts: 11412
Joined: 2008-08-28
Senior Member
Posts: 11412
Joined: 2008-08-28
#5409858 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:10 PM
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
Now that is even more impressive.
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
Now that is even more impressive.
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4267
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4267
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5409860 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:20 PM
I'm guessing this will cost a bare minimum of $5000. Many of Intel's 22-core parts are around $4000.
I'm guessing this will cost a bare minimum of $5000. Many of Intel's 22-core parts are around $4000.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35733
Joined: 2000-02-22
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 35733
Joined: 2000-02-22
#5409869 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:37 PM
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
I'm guessing this will cost a bare minimum of $5000. Many of Intel's 22-core parts are around $4000.
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11351
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11351
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5409884 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:56 PM
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
It must be a measurement of combination of things since 7700k and 1800x @ same clock speed, 7700k gets a little better single score in cinebench.
I have no idea what though, I don't use geekbench
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
It must be a measurement of combination of things since 7700k and 1800x @ same clock speed, 7700k gets a little better single score in cinebench.
I have no idea what though, I don't use geekbench
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5409887 Posted on: 03/20/2017 06:58 PM
The SiSandra improvement from BWE was insane.
Waiting to see what Xeons exist on LGA2066, if any.
The SiSandra improvement from BWE was insane.
Waiting to see what Xeons exist on LGA2066, if any.
Amx85
Senior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: 2016-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 330
Joined: 2016-09-28
#5409888 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:04 PM
I don´t care about geekbench scores, they are so bad optimized, much cache based, lastest intel generation based, and the scores can be edited by webmasters
I don´t care about geekbench scores, they are so bad optimized, much cache based, lastest intel generation based, and the scores can be edited by webmasters
schmidtbag
Senior Member
Posts: 4267
Joined: 2012-11-10
Senior Member
Posts: 4267
Joined: 2012-11-10
#5409889 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:08 PM
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
Touche. But to be fair, there are also 18-cores worth $12,500:
https://www.serversupply.com/products/part-search/pid-lookup.asp?pid=244646&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-73GBRCC7KODl9zToJMBEiQAj1Jgf55iVKBVKc1L8Phe89BYy5NWQMiJvcUVmb80QBRbiZUaAvrR8P8HAQ
And then 22 cores worth $4000:
https://www.serversupply.com/products/part-search/pid-lookup.asp?pid=267787&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-73GBRCC7KODl9zToJMBEiQAj1Jgf2yt0qBcGNbyI3jXrBd2B8oP7qybj8dvy26fLr5LeO8aAkiu8P8HAQ
So uh... I guess we can safely say these 32-core CPUs could range anywhere between $5000-$20,000.
In other words, my first comment was pretty much pointless hahahaha.
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
Touche. But to be fair, there are also 18-cores worth $12,500:
https://www.serversupply.com/products/part-search/pid-lookup.asp?pid=244646&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-73GBRCC7KODl9zToJMBEiQAj1Jgf55iVKBVKc1L8Phe89BYy5NWQMiJvcUVmb80QBRbiZUaAvrR8P8HAQ
And then 22 cores worth $4000:
https://www.serversupply.com/products/part-search/pid-lookup.asp?pid=267787&gclid=Cj0KEQjw-73GBRCC7KODl9zToJMBEiQAj1Jgf2yt0qBcGNbyI3jXrBd2B8oP7qybj8dvy26fLr5LeO8aAkiu8P8HAQ
So uh... I guess we can safely say these 32-core CPUs could range anywhere between $5000-$20,000.
In other words, my first comment was pretty much pointless hahahaha.
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5409898 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:22 PM
Yes, no one is going to be buying these monsters (AMD's or Intel's) for their home desktops, for an absolute certainty...
Yes, no one is going to be buying these monsters (AMD's or Intel's) for their home desktops, for an absolute certainty...
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1232
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5409899 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:24 PM
Or one could have picked up an ES V3, of that proc, which is Haswell Xeon, and exploit the turbo bug forcing 3.6ghz on all 18 cores but with a 135W TDP limit.
My 18 core was only "503.16 US Dollar".
Or one could have picked up an ES V3, of that proc, which is Haswell Xeon, and exploit the turbo bug forcing 3.6ghz on all 18 cores but with a 135W TDP limit.
My 18 core was only "503.16 US Dollar".
waltc3
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 2014-07-22
Senior Member
Posts: 996
Joined: 2014-07-22
#5409901 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:27 PM
It must be a measurement of combination of things since 7700k and 1800x @ same clock speed, 7700k gets a little better single score in cinebench.
I have no idea what though, I don't use geekbench
Synthetic benchmarks, like any other software, are not absolutes. Much not only depends on compiler and code optimization, but on how *well* the benchmark code itself is written--to the point of whether what is being measured by a particular benchmark is even relevant to the user's software environment ...
It must be a measurement of combination of things since 7700k and 1800x @ same clock speed, 7700k gets a little better single score in cinebench.
I have no idea what though, I don't use geekbench
Synthetic benchmarks, like any other software, are not absolutes. Much not only depends on compiler and code optimization, but on how *well* the benchmark code itself is written--to the point of whether what is being measured by a particular benchmark is even relevant to the user's software environment ...
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 895
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 895
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5409903 Posted on: 03/20/2017 07:30 PM
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
I'm curious about the Ryzen server performance, it's so awesome we finally have competition driving development again!
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
Jesus Christ Intel wtf? (To be expected without competition...).
Yes, no one is going to be buying these monsters (AMD's or Intel's) for their home desktops, for an absolute certainty...
But it's interesting to see what could be on our desktops in 10 years time, plus what's powering gaming servers and the internet in general.
It is impressive indeed. However if you take a Ryzen 7 1800X it scores 5000 points SC and anywhere close-to 30000 points with just 8 cores / 16 threads at 3775 MHz.
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=ryzen+1800x&sort=score
I'm curious about the Ryzen server performance, it's so awesome we finally have competition driving development again!
Actually the 24-core part is ... well look for yourself.
http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/intel-launches-xeon-e7-8894-v4-flagship-processor-at-8898-usd.html
Jesus Christ Intel wtf? (To be expected without competition...).
Yes, no one is going to be buying these monsters (AMD's or Intel's) for their home desktops, for an absolute certainty...
But it's interesting to see what could be on our desktops in 10 years time, plus what's powering gaming servers and the internet in general.
SirDremor
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
#5409934 Posted on: 03/20/2017 08:21 PM
Nice. Shows Intel has a lot in the pupeline.
...
and...
In your face, all those Intel-is-doomed sayers!
Nice. Shows Intel has a lot in the pupeline.
...
and...
In your face, all those Intel-is-doomed sayers!
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11351
Joined: 2010-12-27
4000 single core score for 2300mhz?
Even if that's base with a turbo of 2900~ that is seriously impressive considering single core 7700k gets 4400~ with 4500mhz