Basemark GPU v1.2 benchmarks with 36 GPUs
Corsair MP600 Pro XT PCIe 4.0 M.2 NVMe review
Teamgroup MP34Q 2TB NVMe SSD review
Lian Li SP750 (750W PSU) review
Teamgroup Cardea Z44Q 4TB NVMe SSD review
Asus ROG Swift PG32UQX monitor review
Plextor M10P 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
ASRock RX 6600 XT Phantom Gaming D 8GB OC review
G.Skill TridentZ Royal Elite DDR4 3600 MHz CL14 review
Corsair HS80 RGB Wireless Headset review
20TB drives with SMR from Seagate coming in the next few months
Man, that is going up fast, volume that is. Seagate will release its first 20-terabyte hard drives shortly. The shingle magnetic recording based units offer more density but at the detriment of writing speed.
20TB HAMR disks have already are selling. This year, the company claimed that 22 and 24 terabyte capacity should also be complied with using this heat-assisted technology. The CEO of Seagate claims the majority of the HDDs used for the bitcoin mining industry in Chia were sold on the second hand market. The currency accounted for just 4 to 7% of demand for exabytes for the firm, reducing the need to boost production. The overall quantity of storage in Chia increased by roughly 5 percent between early July and 22 July, from 29.2 to 31.8 petabytes.
Seagate CEO
We expect to begin shipping 20 terabyte PMR drives in the second half of this calendar year.
hawk7000
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 2017-08-24
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 2017-08-24
#5932179 Posted on: 07/25/2021 05:46 PM
Title: "20TB drives with SMR from Seagate coming in the next few months"
Quote from Seagate: "We expect to begin shipping 20 terabyte PMR drives in the second half of this calendar year."
Are these different drives, or is the title wrong and this is about PMR/CMR drives?
Title: "20TB drives with SMR from Seagate coming in the next few months"
Quote from Seagate: "We expect to begin shipping 20 terabyte PMR drives in the second half of this calendar year."
Are these different drives, or is the title wrong and this is about PMR/CMR drives?
LimitbreakOr
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2015-04-02
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2015-04-02
#5932475 Posted on: 07/26/2021 05:04 PM
I had a displeasure of experiencing how unusably bad Shingled drives are, I wouldn't go anywhere near these garbage. At best they are like using a rewritable CD as if it was an HDD.
I had a displeasure of experiencing how unusably bad Shingled drives are, I wouldn't go anywhere near these garbage. At best they are like using a rewritable CD as if it was an HDD.
heffeque
Senior Member
Posts: 4147
Joined: 2003-03-03
Senior Member
Posts: 4147
Joined: 2003-03-03
#5932487 Posted on: 07/26/2021 06:12 PM
Using SMR here on an small-sized (2.5") large capacity (5TB) external USB 3.0 drive for using Hyper Backup on my NAS. For this use-case they are fairly capable, and there are no 2.5" drives that are large capacity (5TB or more) that are not SMR as far as I know, so there is actually no alternative other than to go to extremely expensive SSD, or to change to a bigger form factor.
But anyway... any workload slightly more complicated than that and... yup, wouldn't even think of using SMR!
I had a displeasure of experiencing how unusably bad Shingled drives are, I wouldn't go anywhere near these garbage. At best they are like using a rewritable CD as if it was an HDD.
Using SMR here on an small-sized (2.5") large capacity (5TB) external USB 3.0 drive for using Hyper Backup on my NAS. For this use-case they are fairly capable, and there are no 2.5" drives that are large capacity (5TB or more) that are not SMR as far as I know, so there is actually no alternative other than to go to extremely expensive SSD, or to change to a bigger form factor.
But anyway... any workload slightly more complicated than that and... yup, wouldn't even think of using SMR!
LimitbreakOr
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2015-04-02
Senior Member
Posts: 392
Joined: 2015-04-02
#5932524 Posted on: 07/26/2021 08:51 PM
But anyway... any workload slightly more complicated than that and... yup, wouldn't even think of using SMR!
Yeah, that would be one of the very rare and unique situations where SMR isn't completely useless although CMR would still be preferable.
But anyway... any workload slightly more complicated than that and... yup, wouldn't even think of using SMR!
Yeah, that would be one of the very rare and unique situations where SMR isn't completely useless although CMR would still be preferable.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 4147
Joined: 2003-03-03
I still remember when higher capacity hard drives meant that the lower capacity hard drives got cheaper.
What a time to be alive!