Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 processor review

New Downloads
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4090
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36


New Forum Topics
AMD Polaris (RX 400/500) users unable to play Forspoken AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion Rumor: Further GeForce RTX 4090 Ti specs emerge X570 PCH Fan problems (?) MSI Interrupt Steering Causing Input Lag Windows 10 7940HS engineering sample benchmarks (true, not true?) Info Zone - gEngines, Ray Tracing, DLSS, DLAA, TSR, FSR, XeSS, DLDSR etc. NVIDIA GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download & Discussion Windows power plan settings explorer utility The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics performance benchmark analysis




Guru3D.com » News » 16-core Ryzen part would reportedly run at 3.1 GHz base and 3.6 GHz Turbo

16-core Ryzen part would reportedly run at 3.1 GHz base and 3.6 GHz Turbo

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/24/2017 04:16 PM | source: | 19 comment(s)
16-core Ryzen part would reportedly run at 3.1 GHz base and 3.6 GHz Turbo

Last week we reported on a new rumor that AMD is working on a high-end desktop 16 core 32 threaded Ryzen processor series. These processors initially have been reported with a low base-clock in the 2.4 to 2.8 GHz range. It's reported that this 16-core and 32-treaded beast would do a 3.1 GHz base and 3.6 GHz Turbo frequency, yep that is like two R7 1700 CPUs.

This processor would be quad-channel compatible. The TDP for this product would sit in the 150 to 180 Watt range. So basically the package holds 4 CCXs.The processor would need an enthusiast chipset called X399 with socket (Land Grid Array) SP3r2 LGA and thus likely a spin-off from the server series. This platform and processor might become available in the next 4 to 6 months. This new information might be true, but take this one with a grain of salt please. If true, that would be an awesome processor series, bit I cannot help feeling it seems a bit unlikely. 







« MSI GeForce GTX 1080 Ti GAMING X Graphics Card - Detailed Photos · 16-core Ryzen part would reportedly run at 3.1 GHz base and 3.6 GHz Turbo · Gigabyte releases Z270X DESIGNARE Motherboard With Quadro Validation »

Related Stories

Intel preps 16-core Xeon D-1571 processor at 45 Watt - 02/16/2016 10:15 AM
Though intended for micro-servers, Intel is prepping a Xeon D-1571 processor rated at 45 Watt, the beauty of it all, it has 16 Broadwell CPU cores. So that would be 32 logical CPUs with Hyper Threa...

AMD releases new 12- and 16-Core Opteron 6300 Series Processors - 01/22/2014 10:16 AM
AMD today announced the immediate availability of its new 12- and 16-core AMD Opteron 6300 Series server processors, code named "Warsaw." Designed for enterprise workloads, the new AMD Opt...

AMD Working on 16-Core Processor with Integrated PCI Express 3.0 Controller - 01/17/2014 03:17 PM
In a document published by AMD some new information surfaced. It seems that AMD is working on a new 16-core processor, and that is a true 16 cores, thus not 8 cores and 4 GPU cores or anything. And no...

AMD 16-Core Interlagos Server CPUs ships in August - 07/26/2011 02:17 AM
This processor series has popped up in the news a couple of times already. Its getting more substantial now though. As it seems

AMD 16-core Interlagos platform in Q2 2011 - 11/18/2010 01:04 PM
Scheduled for production in the second quarter of 2011 and launch with widespread availability in the third quarter, AMD has revealed its latest Interlagos processor featuring up to 16 cores and four ...


4 pages 1 2 3 4


xafier
Senior Member



Posts: 827
Joined: 2004-04-03

#5411934 Posted on: 03/24/2017 04:42 PM
That would be an absolute monster as a workstation machine for developers, video editing, 3D modelling etc

Just got my 1700X yesterday and TBH, once I've got it overclocked it will be more than enough machine for me compared with my OC'd 2500k.

Something like that 16 core beast would be great for work though, currently running a 5820k @ 4.2Ghz for software development but more cores would be very welcome given it takes 30 minutes to do a full rebuild of our software on this machine.

SSD_PRO
Senior Member



Posts: 180
Joined: 2013-02-07

#5411936 Posted on: 03/24/2017 04:46 PM
This would be a beast if it holds, for sure. Something definitely worthy of a 1000-1200 price tag. If AMD comes in below 1000, that's a stunner.

Fender178
Senior Member



Posts: 4196
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5411942 Posted on: 03/24/2017 05:08 PM
Heck if this thing could OC to 3.9-4 Ghz on 16 cores man that would be a good boost. Also this thing could be very useful for those Users who do alot with Virtual Machines.

Enticles
Senior Member



Posts: 242
Joined: 2012-06-28

#5411970 Posted on: 03/24/2017 06:23 PM
This would be a beast if it holds, for sure. Something definitely worthy of a 1000-1200 price tag. If AMD comes in below 1000, that's a stunner.


As much as i would hope to see the 16c/32t SKU staying under $1000, i am doubtful that it will.

AMD would be the first to create a "desktop grade" (this excludes Xeon and Opteron classes of CPU) 16c/32t chip. That fact alone will make them want to charge top dollar for it.

I'd be very interested in it for my virtual server lab, if funds would allow it.

tsunami231
Senior Member



Posts: 13379
Joined: 2003-05-24

#5411979 Posted on: 03/24/2017 06:44 PM
This would be a beast if it holds, for sure. Something definitely worthy of a 1000-1200 price tag. If AMD comes in below 1000, that's a stunner.


I dont think anyone wants to see AMD start pulling the same thing INTEL does as it will drive prices up not down.

With AMD actual being able to compete for once, I like many are hoping to seeing pricing war.

4 pages 1 2 3 4


Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.


Guru3D.com © 2023