ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled
MSI VIGOR GK71 SONIC Blue keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D processor review
FSP Hydro G Pro 1000W (ATX 3.0, 1000W PSU) review
Addlink S90 Lite 2TB NVMe SSD review
12 Core Core i9-7920X CPU-Z Screenshot Surfaces and Shows Specs
Last week we already reported that Intels 12-core Intel Core i9 7920X will get a 400 MHz slower base-clock compared to the 10-core 7900X, that information is now confirmed with a leaked CPU-Z screenshot. The screenshot also reveals a multiplier, and will tell you the Turbo/Boost frequency.
That turbo multiplier is 44 for this $1,199 USD Core i9-7920X, ergo some or just one thread will run at 4400z MH coming all the way from that 2.9 GHz base-clock. The low base-clock is likely needed to deal with heat of the many core design and TDP. The rest of the turbos should be hovering at the familiar 4 GHz domain. The chip has 16.5 MB of L3 and 12 MB of L2 cache.
And that makes things interesting with ther 12-core Ryzen Threadripper part here. AMDs 12-core part will have a 600 MHz faster base clock at 3.5 GHz (boost 4.0 GHz).
| Clock | Turbo 2.0/3.0 | Cores / threads | L3-cache | PCIe 3.0 | Mem Channels | TDP | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core i9 7980XE | TBA | TBA | 18/36 | TBA | TBA | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | TBA | $1999 |
| Core i9 7960X | 2.5 GHz | TBA | 16/32 | 22MB | TBA | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | TBA | $1699 |
| Core i9 7940X | TBA | TBA | 14/28 | TBA | TBA | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | TBA | $1399 |
| Core i9 7920X | 2.9 GHz | 4.0/4.4 GHz | 12/24 | 16,5 MB | TBA | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | 140 W | $1199 |
| Core i9 7900X | 3.3 GHz | 4.3/4.5 GHz | 10/20 | 13,75 MB | 44 | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | 140 W | $999 |
| Core i7 7820X | 3.6 GHz | 4.3/4.5 GHz | 8/16 | 11 MB | 28 | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | 140 W | $599 |
| Core i7 7800X | 3.5 GHz | 4.0 GHz | 6/12 | 8,25 MB | 28 | Quad-channel DDR4-2666 | 140 W | $389 |
| Core i7 7740X | 4.3 GHz | 4.5 GHz | 4/8 | 8 MB | 16 | Dual-channel DDR4-2666 | 112 W | $339 |
| Core i5 7640X | 4.0 GHz | 4.2 GHz | 4/4 | 6 MB | 16 | Dual-channel DDR4-2666 | 112 W | $242 |
8 Core SandyBridge-E and 6-12 core IvyBridge-E in 2013 - 01/04/2013 07:18 PM
yet another Intel roadmap has leaked onto the web. This one should please the more enthusiast users alright. There are two main upcoming product launches, with the more interesting one being the 4th ...
AMD Opteron 6100 Series 8 and 12 core processors - 02/15/2011 01:27 PM
AMD is making bold claims: Industry
SirDremor
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: 2008-06-20
#5455672 Posted on: 07/26/2017 10:16 AM
No.
There's not a single Threadripper true benchmark result available, no one knows for sure how it will function, throttle and so on. So...
So basically this will be slower than the 12 core Ryzen Threadripper because the IPC are the almost the same on Ryzen architecture, but with some price difference in AMD favour.
No.
There's not a single Threadripper true benchmark result available, no one knows for sure how it will function, throttle and so on. So...
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: 2012-04-30
Senior Member
Posts: 1925
Joined: 2012-04-30
#5455685 Posted on: 07/26/2017 11:22 AM
and that was the same for ryzen.
i say the chance that amd is releasing what everyone expects (performance wise), is pretty good.
for intel, not so much, as most pro-consumer are not willing to spend more and get less (vs amd)
unless they drink blue koolaid..
and that was the same for ryzen.
i say the chance that amd is releasing what everyone expects (performance wise), is pretty good.
for intel, not so much, as most pro-consumer are not willing to spend more and get less (vs amd)
unless they drink blue koolaid..
Guru3dreader
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2017-01-07
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2017-01-07
#5455691 Posted on: 07/26/2017 11:57 AM
How do you fit a 12 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You lower the base frequency at 2.9GHz.
How do you fit an 18 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You don't want to know.
How do you fit a 12 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You lower the base frequency at 2.9GHz.
How do you fit an 18 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You don't want to know.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 1968
Joined: 2013-06-04
Senior Member
Posts: 1968
Joined: 2013-06-04
#5455695 Posted on: 07/26/2017 12:04 PM
No.
There's not a single Threadripper true benchmark result available, no one knows for sure how it will function, throttle and so on. So...
For sure its the same as 2xRyzen7 1700 at least.
How do you fit a 12 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You lower the base frequency at 2.9GHz.
How do you fit an 18 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You don't want to know.
No.
There's not a single Threadripper true benchmark result available, no one knows for sure how it will function, throttle and so on. So...
For sure its the same as 2xRyzen7 1700 at least.
How do you fit a 12 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You lower the base frequency at 2.9GHz.
How do you fit an 18 core processor on a socket for a 10 core processor?
You don't want to know.
Click here to post a comment for this news story on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 30
Joined: 2015-09-04
So basically this will be slower than the 12 core Ryzen Threadripper because the IPC are the almost the same on Ryzen architecture, but with some price difference in AMD favour.
Next let see the 16 core I9 how much will the base clock will be lowered vs 16 core Rysen.
If that applies to the 18 core I9 too, as usually does, I wont be surprised if its slower than the 16 core Ryzen, X2 the price.
Can`t wait for some real world testing.