Guru3D Winter 2019 PC Buyer Guide
Corsair QL120 and QL140 RGB fan review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro for $13 With Office 2016 For $33
Corsair Void RGB Elite Wireless Headset review
Team Group PD400 Portable SSD review
AMD Athlon 3000G review
Team Group T-Force Delta Max 1 TB SSD review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - November 2019
ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore review
Toshiba RC500 500GB NVMe M.2 SSD review
HWiNFO64 Download v6.20
on: 12/05/2019 08:02 AM [ 6 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download HWiNFO64 - a System Information and Diagnostics Tool. HWInfo64 is an application that monitors your PC's components and outs computer information about your the operating system, storage capacity, and RAM. It also displays more technical data, such as the number of logical CPUs, memory speed, and temperatures.
HWiNFO is a professional hardware information and diagnostic tools supporting latest components, industry technologies, and standards. Both tools are targeted to recognize and extract the most possible amount of information about computer's hardware which makes them suitable for users searching for driver updates, computer manufacturers, system integrators and technical experts too.
Changes:
- Enhanced sensor monitoring on GIGABYTE X299X and TRX40 series.
- Added monitoring of Noise sensor on some GIGABYTE mainboards.
- Added reporting of total Average Effective Clock.
- Added reporting of SATA/NVMe current interface in summary.
- Added reporting of PBO Scalar value for AMD Matisse.
- Improved reporting of HDA Codec.
- Fixed losing of some sensor items on some CPUs after suspend/resume.
- Improved support of ATI mach64.
- Enhanced sensor monitoring on Intel Quartz Canyon and Ghost Canyon NUC.
- Added reporting of TDP setting for AMD Ryzen APUs.
- Enhanced sensor monitoring on ASUS WS C422 series.
- Enhanced sensor monitoring on ASUS STRIX TRX40‑E GAMING and PRIME TRX40-PRO.
- Added reporting of Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) core order.
- Enhanced support of AMD 3rd Gen Ryzen Threadripper.
- Enhanced support of Intel Rocket Lake.
- Enhanced sensor monitoring on ASRock TRX40 Taichi and TRX40 Creator.
- Added reporting and monitoring of PPT, TDC and EDC limits and actual values for AMD Zen2 family.
- Added universal monitoring of FCLK for AMD Zen2 family.
- Added monitoring of CPU Die average temperature for AMD Zen2 family.
- Adjusted reporting of SVI2 TFN Current/Power, removed reporting on systems where accurate values are not guaranteed.
- Added reporting of cLDO VDDP and VDDG for AMD Zen2 family.
2 pages 1 2
chispy
Senior Member
Posts: 8758
Joined: 2006-10-29
Senior Member
Posts: 8758
Joined: 2006-10-29
#5656687 Posted on: 04/03/2019 03:54 PM
Thank you for the update Mumak , downloading now.
Thank you for the update Mumak , downloading now.
Groot
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-09-08
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-09-08
#5661059 Posted on: 04/17/2019 03:18 PM
Ran v6.04 with Z97 + i7-4980HQ and HWinfo seems to be reporting only 80% of CPU / DRAM power. In fact this 80% reporting seems to go way back to at least version 543
Version 502 gives the expected values so don't know why newer versions are different.
Ran v6.04 with Z97 + i7-4980HQ and HWinfo seems to be reporting only 80% of CPU / DRAM power. In fact this 80% reporting seems to go way back to at least version 543
Version 502 gives the expected values so don't know why newer versions are different.
Mumak
Senior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: 2008-09-05
Senior Member
Posts: 156
Joined: 2008-09-05
#5669635 Posted on: 05/15/2019 09:38 PM
Ran v6.04 with Z97 + i7-4980HQ and HWinfo seems to be reporting only 80% of CPU / DRAM power. In fact this 80% reporting seems to go way back to at least version 543
Version 502 gives the expected values so don't know why newer versions are different.
What is your actual BCLK and what PCIe clock is shown in HWiNFO, 125 MHz ?
It would be great if you could attach the HWiNFO Debug File.
Ran v6.04 with Z97 + i7-4980HQ and HWinfo seems to be reporting only 80% of CPU / DRAM power. In fact this 80% reporting seems to go way back to at least version 543
Version 502 gives the expected values so don't know why newer versions are different.
What is your actual BCLK and what PCIe clock is shown in HWiNFO, 125 MHz ?
It would be great if you could attach the HWiNFO Debug File.
Groot
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-09-08
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: 2016-09-08
#5671729 Posted on: 05/22/2019 06:27 AM
Hi Martin, in that particular SS using 4:5 strap, BCLK 125, PCIe 100.
RAPL appears tied to BCLK, ie proportionally more counts per millisecond the higher BCLK is.
For instance using a forced power limit of 40W with fixed voltage supply shows the same power delta form mains supply, 12V Rail supply and VRM IOUT for straps of 5:5, 4:5 and 3:5 and same throttled clocks at 100MHz, 125MHz and 167MHz BCLK. HWiNFO shows 40W for package power for all straps while the others including latest XTU to date show 40W, 50W and 66W respectively, each proportional to the strap used. So in this case HWiNFO is correct and others wrong.
I'm assuming you switched to using the strap ratio for RAPL estimations at some point but have maybe forgotten with all that has happened since then. Your results don't seem to be based solely on BCLK as changing BCLK to 95MHz and PCIe at 95MHz results in 38W being reported with 40W limit. I'm a little surprised this isn't mentioned in the Intel SDM or specification update unless I missed it and even more surprised that XTU is incorrect.
Hi Martin, in that particular SS using 4:5 strap, BCLK 125, PCIe 100.
RAPL appears tied to BCLK, ie proportionally more counts per millisecond the higher BCLK is.
For instance using a forced power limit of 40W with fixed voltage supply shows the same power delta form mains supply, 12V Rail supply and VRM IOUT for straps of 5:5, 4:5 and 3:5 and same throttled clocks at 100MHz, 125MHz and 167MHz BCLK. HWiNFO shows 40W for package power for all straps while the others including latest XTU to date show 40W, 50W and 66W respectively, each proportional to the strap used. So in this case HWiNFO is correct and others wrong.
I'm assuming you switched to using the strap ratio for RAPL estimations at some point but have maybe forgotten with all that has happened since then. Your results don't seem to be based solely on BCLK as changing BCLK to 95MHz and PCIe at 95MHz results in 38W being reported with 40W limit. I'm a little surprised this isn't mentioned in the Intel SDM or specification update unless I missed it and even more surprised that XTU is incorrect.
2 pages 1 2
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 12007
Joined: 2008-08-28
Thanks!