Solidigm P44 Pro (1TB/2TB) M.2 NVMe SSD Review
EnGenius ECW336 WIFI6E Access Point review
MSI MEG Z790 ACE review
Deepcool LT720 LCS Cooler Review
Arctic A35/I35 A-RGB air coolers review
Minisforum HX90G (Ryzen 9 5900HX + RX 6600M) mini PC review
MSI MPG Z790 Edge (DDR4) review
MSI GeForce RTX 4080 Gaming X TRIO review
Deepcool CH510 chassis review
Asus Delta S Wireless Headset review
GeForce 461.51 hotfix driver download
on: 02/07/2021 10:07 AM [ 122 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce, 461.51 Hotfix driver, as released by NVIDIA. This release fixes several issues with Chrome/Edge, Edge of Eternity/Hitman 2, LG CX OLED TVs, NVIDIA Surround, and notebook power issues.
Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is optimized for the best gameplay on day-1. We have a discussion thread open on this driver here in our Nvidia driver discussion forums. For those that wonder, the DCH driver is a Microsoft DCH (Declarative Componentized Hardware supported apps) driver, and refers to a new Windows 10 driver package preinstalled by OEMS implementing the Microsoft Universal Driver paradigm. While the base core component files remain the same, the way DCH drivers are packaged differs from previous Legacy (Standard) drivers.
GeForce Hotfix display driver version 461.51 is based on our latest Game Ready Driver 461.40. The drivers are compatible with both Desktop and mobile GPUs.
The hotfix addresses the following issues:
- [Ampere] Chrome/Edge may experience random TDR while browsing [3195894]
- [G-SYNC][Edge of Eternity/Hitman 2]: The games experience stutter and low FPS when Hardware-accelerated GPU scheduling in windowed mode [200685971]
- Wallpaper Engine app may crash on startup or upon resume from sleep. [3208963]
- [461.40] LG CX OLED TVs (2020) are not recognized as G-SYNC Compatible displays [3244055]
- [Surround][RTX 30 series] PC may display no signal message when enabling NVIDIA Surround [3230565]
On some Notebooks ‘Maximum Graphics Power’ information missing in NV Control Panel - System Information [200697069]
GeForce RTX 30 Series:
GeForce RTX 3090, GeForce RTX 3080, 3070, 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 20 Series:
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, GeForce RTX 2080 (Super), GeForce RTX 2070 (Super), GeForce 2060 (Super), Titan RTX
GeForce 16 Series:
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER/Ti, GeForce GTX 1660, GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce GTX 1650 Super
NVIDIA TITAN Series
NVIDIA TITAN V, NVIDIA TITAN Xp, NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal), GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce 10 Series
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1050, GeForce GT 1030
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 635, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
Have your read the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti review already?
25 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
tfam26
Unregistered
Unregistered
#5885117 Posted on: 02/07/2021 10:28 AM
Why?
i yet have to see an ampere card that cant do +1000 on the memory rock stable.
Why?
JonasBeckman
Senior Member
Posts: 17562
Joined: 2009-02-25
Senior Member
Posts: 17562
Joined: 2009-02-25
#5885120 Posted on: 02/07/2021 10:41 AM
Providing a bit more power to them via GeForce Experience seems like it helps particularly the 3090 but I don't know how well a manual overclock would work compared to just letting the boost algorithm scale it within it's various parameters although the memory states could be a bit more flexible if it's about these.
Not much of a overclock though it's just adding a bit extra for the GPU to utilize before it throttles compared to modifying voltages or the clock speed or curvature for it I think is how it works now.
As for memory flexibility well sorta, might be a bit of a range on them like on AMD as well with error correction kicking in so it runs all the way up to near maximum without artifacts but the ECC makes for limited or reduced performance gains and scaling it back instead is more gainful.
Not sure how sensitive Ampere and GDDR6X is though AMD RDNA1 was fairly sensitive and RDNA2 while a bit better is both locked at a fairly low maximum and tends to hit ECC early on so testing is needed to confirm if it really works or not.
EDIT: Actually was there even any data on that I think Micron had something like ECC but not quite the same but the available info was more limited from what I remember of trying to look it up at least.
EDIT: Forward Error Correction.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15978/micron-spills-on-gddr6x-pam4-signaling-for-higher-rates-coming-to-nvidias-rtx-3090
Providing a bit more power to them via GeForce Experience seems like it helps particularly the 3090 but I don't know how well a manual overclock would work compared to just letting the boost algorithm scale it within it's various parameters although the memory states could be a bit more flexible if it's about these.
Not much of a overclock though it's just adding a bit extra for the GPU to utilize before it throttles compared to modifying voltages or the clock speed or curvature for it I think is how it works now.
As for memory flexibility well sorta, might be a bit of a range on them like on AMD as well with error correction kicking in so it runs all the way up to near maximum without artifacts but the ECC makes for limited or reduced performance gains and scaling it back instead is more gainful.
Not sure how sensitive Ampere and GDDR6X is though AMD RDNA1 was fairly sensitive and RDNA2 while a bit better is both locked at a fairly low maximum and tends to hit ECC early on so testing is needed to confirm if it really works or not.
EDIT: Actually was there even any data on that I think Micron had something like ECC but not quite the same but the available info was more limited from what I remember of trying to look it up at least.
EDIT: Forward Error Correction.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/15978/micron-spills-on-gddr6x-pam4-signaling-for-higher-rates-coming-to-nvidias-rtx-3090
looniam
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: 2013-01-31
Senior Member
Posts: 207
Joined: 2013-01-31
#5885126 Posted on: 02/07/2021 11:08 AM
mining?
just a guess, sorry for using a "dirty word" . .
Why?
mining?
just a guess, sorry for using a "dirty word" . .
Sylencer
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Joined: 2015-05-23
Senior Member
Posts: 228
Joined: 2015-05-23
#5885135 Posted on: 02/07/2021 11:44 AM
I'll better wait for the next WHQL one, the past couple drivers since december did all not fix my issues with stuttering/microfreezing several programs while opening or closing them. Also opening NVCP or Windows Display settings caused a small lag/freeze also. The past 3 drivers messed up my monitor too, sometimes upon boot it switches randomly from RGB to YCBRxxx and requires to change it in NVCP back, but it doesn't change until another reboot and changing it again from YCBRxxx to RGB to finally stick. This drives me mad for weeks now. Only happens when games force fullscreen or some random spastics when you run the game in borderless but it still goes from windowed to fullscreen to your settings (Star Wars Battlefront 2 2017) while booting up....had the same issue with BF V, but only on one monitor with my 3 monitor config. Now it happens on all 3 monitors whenever i boot up a game all 3 monitors flicker/turn black and mess with my desktop icons until the game really started and wents to borderless. I think it's the games fault tho.
@ManuelG
Systems specs:
RTX 3090 Asus Strix oc, factory oc with silent profile - latest VBIOS
ASUS VG27AQ as main monitor, Dell S2417DG as left and ASUS VG248QE as right. All on 144hz
MAXIMUS XII Formula with latest bios
10900k stock turbo settings
G.Skill 4000mhz CL15 RAM 32GB
Latest windows update, included optional ones.
I'll better wait for the next WHQL one, the past couple drivers since december did all not fix my issues with stuttering/microfreezing several programs while opening or closing them. Also opening NVCP or Windows Display settings caused a small lag/freeze also. The past 3 drivers messed up my monitor too, sometimes upon boot it switches randomly from RGB to YCBRxxx and requires to change it in NVCP back, but it doesn't change until another reboot and changing it again from YCBRxxx to RGB to finally stick. This drives me mad for weeks now. Only happens when games force fullscreen or some random spastics when you run the game in borderless but it still goes from windowed to fullscreen to your settings (Star Wars Battlefront 2 2017) while booting up....had the same issue with BF V, but only on one monitor with my 3 monitor config. Now it happens on all 3 monitors whenever i boot up a game all 3 monitors flicker/turn black and mess with my desktop icons until the game really started and wents to borderless. I think it's the games fault tho.
@ManuelG
Systems specs:
RTX 3090 Asus Strix oc, factory oc with silent profile - latest VBIOS
ASUS VG27AQ as main monitor, Dell S2417DG as left and ASUS VG248QE as right. All on 144hz
MAXIMUS XII Formula with latest bios
10900k stock turbo settings
G.Skill 4000mhz CL15 RAM 32GB
Latest windows update, included optional ones.
25 pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 277
Joined: 2020-12-29
Egads, overclocking Ampere?
You're better off putting a tremolo bar on a tuba.
I do agree that modern components are not really OC friendly in a sense that they are usually already pushed to the max. But on the other hand i yet have to see an ampere card that cant do +1000 on the memory rock stable.