AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce 441.34 Hotfix driver download
on: 11/19/2019 08:10 PM [ 78 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce 441.34 Hotfix driver as released by NVIDIA.
Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is optimized for the best gameplay on day-1. We have a discussion thread open on this driver here in our Nvidia driver discussion forums. For those that wonder, the DCH driver is a Microsoft DCH (Declarative Componentized Hardware supported apps) driver, and refers to a new Windows 10 driver package preinstalled by OEMS implementing the Microsoft Universal Driver paradigm. While the base core component files remain the same, the way DCH drivers are packaged differs from previous Legacy (Standard) drivers.
This Hotfix driver addresses the following:
- Red Dead Redemption 2 Vulkan: Stalling on some systems with 4-core and 6-core CPUs
- Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Game may crash when launched in DX12 mode.
GeForce RTX 20 Series:
GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, GeForce RTX 2080 (Super), GeForce RTX 2070 (Super), GeForce 2060 (Super), Titan RTX
GeForce 16 Series:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, GeForce GTX 1660, GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA TITAN Series
NVIDIA TITAN V, NVIDIA TITAN Xp, NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal), GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce 10 Series
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070 Ti, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1650, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1050, GeForce GT 1030
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 635, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
Have you read our MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Gaming X review already?
16 pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Smiley_ie
Senior Member
Posts: 275
Joined: 2012-12-06
Senior Member
Posts: 275
Joined: 2012-12-06
#5733027 Posted on: 11/19/2019 08:29 PM
Running DX12 in RD no need for this driver ?
Running DX12 in RD no need for this driver ?
Flakman
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: 2003-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: 2003-09-28
#5733031 Posted on: 11/19/2019 08:48 PM
Running fine here,
If you have no issues, no need to update. But I seldom have issues with nVidia drivers..
Running fine here,
If you have no issues, no need to update. But I seldom have issues with nVidia drivers..
Globespy
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2019-09-03
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 2019-09-03
#5733060 Posted on: 11/19/2019 09:45 PM
Oh, you mean just like 4-core systems are dead and can't run any games?
If you are talking about productivity and heavy CPU intensive workloads then sure, most would buy something with more cores like one of the new Ryzen CPU's.
For gaming?
Until we see a monumental shift with games all being developed in DX12 or later then there's really very little need for more than 4-6 cores unless you are a streamer and don't have a separate streaming PC.
DX11 is still prolific in gaming, and until that changes there's absolutely no benefit in having more than 6 cores - even with the more advanced gaming engines like Ubisoft's 'SnowDrop' engine.
I've ran comparisons between my OC'd i7 8086K @ 5.3Ghz all cores (no AVX offset) and a recent Ryzen 3900X build.
Guess what?
The 8086K wins every game comparison (at stock clock speeds they are about the same for gaming FPS at 1080p and 1440p), proving that single core clock speeds are still king in gaming.
Until we see an AMD part able to hit 5Ghz+ on more than 50% of the cores, that won't change.
More cores for gaming right now is literally pointless, especially as you move to 1440p and 4K where it becomes even less important what CPU you have as the GPU takes over.
For workload/encoding etc of course the extra cores come into play - but most gamers build PC's to game, not to run blender!
Here's a nice video showing the same CPU's at stock clock speeds just for your reference:
VIDEO REMOVED!
Maybe in a few years when DX11 is a thing of the past, but I don't define that as 'real soon' when I build a new PC every other year.
4-core and 6-core systems are reaching EOL real soon.
Oh, you mean just like 4-core systems are dead and can't run any games?
If you are talking about productivity and heavy CPU intensive workloads then sure, most would buy something with more cores like one of the new Ryzen CPU's.
For gaming?
Until we see a monumental shift with games all being developed in DX12 or later then there's really very little need for more than 4-6 cores unless you are a streamer and don't have a separate streaming PC.
DX11 is still prolific in gaming, and until that changes there's absolutely no benefit in having more than 6 cores - even with the more advanced gaming engines like Ubisoft's 'SnowDrop' engine.
I've ran comparisons between my OC'd i7 8086K @ 5.3Ghz all cores (no AVX offset) and a recent Ryzen 3900X build.
Guess what?
The 8086K wins every game comparison (at stock clock speeds they are about the same for gaming FPS at 1080p and 1440p), proving that single core clock speeds are still king in gaming.
Until we see an AMD part able to hit 5Ghz+ on more than 50% of the cores, that won't change.
More cores for gaming right now is literally pointless, especially as you move to 1440p and 4K where it becomes even less important what CPU you have as the GPU takes over.
For workload/encoding etc of course the extra cores come into play - but most gamers build PC's to game, not to run blender!
Here's a nice video showing the same CPU's at stock clock speeds just for your reference:
VIDEO REMOVED!
Maybe in a few years when DX11 is a thing of the past, but I don't define that as 'real soon' when I build a new PC every other year.
Valerys
Senior Member
Posts: 393
Joined: 2008-07-18
Senior Member
Posts: 393
Joined: 2008-07-18
#5733062 Posted on: 11/19/2019 09:48 PM
Pretty sure he meant 4-6 threads, not cores. With this driver's occasion I figured out my driver has been replaced with 432.00 at some point with no warning.
Pretty sure he meant 4-6 threads, not cores. With this driver's occasion I figured out my driver has been replaced with 432.00 at some point with no warning.
16 pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 78
Joined: 2016-07-12
Finally!!