Cooler Master MasterBox NR600 review
MSI to unveil 10th Anniversary RTX 2080 Ti Lightning Edition
Ballistix Elite 3600 MHz 16GB Dual Channel DDR4 review
ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AC2900 Gaming Router review
Asustor Nimbustor 4 (AS5304T) NAS Review
Promo: VIP-SCDKey Games and Windows 10 / Office
be quiet! Dark Rock SLIM review
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming OC review
Edifier G4 Pro Headset review
Microsoft Office 2016 Pro and Windows 10 Pro for just $34
GeForce 375.70 WHQL driver download
on: 10/28/2016 03:06 PM [ 28 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 375.70 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA.
Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is included for the best gameplay on day-1.
Game Ready
Provides the optimal experience for Titanfall 2, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Special Edition, Obduction, and Dishonored 2
Application SLI Profiles
Added or updated the following SLI profiles:
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands - added temporal SLI profile
Game Ready VR
Provides the optimal experience for Obduction
Game Ready
Provides the optimal experience for Battlefield 1, Civilization VI, and Titanfall 2
Game Ready VR
Provides the optimal VR experience for Eagle Flight and Serious Sam VR: The Last Hope
We have a discussion thread open on this driver right here.
Gaming Technology
Supports the new GeForce GTX 10-series GPUs powering gaming notebooks
Supported desktop cards:
GeForce 10 Series
NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal), GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 635, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
GeForce 500 Series
GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510
GeForce 400 Series
GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420
Have you read our Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) Review already?
2 pages 1 2
XenthorX
Senior Member
Posts: 2396
Joined: 2014-06-17
Senior Member
Posts: 2396
Joined: 2014-06-17
#5352234 Posted on: 10/29/2016 01:17 AM
It's like 3 drivers in 1 week and a half? They need to chill a bit.
It's like 3 drivers in 1 week and a half? They need to chill a bit.
Spets
Senior Member
Posts: 2977
Joined: 2011-05-10
Senior Member
Posts: 2977
Joined: 2011-05-10
#5352255 Posted on: 10/29/2016 02:39 AM
Better to have day 1 support for games than not at all
It's like 3 drivers in 1 week and a half? They need to chill a bit.
Better to have day 1 support for games than not at all
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352274 Posted on: 10/29/2016 04:17 AM
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352287 Posted on: 10/29/2016 05:49 AM
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
It's your imagination that they are crippling maxwell.. lol
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
It's your imagination that they are crippling maxwell.. lol
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352297 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:20 AM
No, it's real world performance in every single game I tested from modern games to ****ing League of Legends. When you lose 15 frames a second in a game you can barely maintain 60 fps, that's a problem.
And no, I'm not the only one reporting performance falling off a cliff after the 368 drivers.
It's your imagination that they are crippling maxwell.. lol
No, it's real world performance in every single game I tested from modern games to ****ing League of Legends. When you lose 15 frames a second in a game you can barely maintain 60 fps, that's a problem.
And no, I'm not the only one reporting performance falling off a cliff after the 368 drivers.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352298 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:20 AM
System issue. Nobody is crippling anything.
No issues here or on a 980 system.
No, it's real world performance in every single game I tested from modern games to ****ing League of Legends.
System issue. Nobody is crippling anything.
No issues here or on a 980 system.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352300 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:22 AM
System issue. Nobody is crippling anything.
No issues here or on a 980 system.
A 980 Ti is not a 970? What system issues? Why does everything magically work fine when reverting drivers? Why is everyone with a 970 who I've asked this reporting the same results?
System issue. Nobody is crippling anything.
No issues here or on a 980 system.
A 980 Ti is not a 970? What system issues? Why does everything magically work fine when reverting drivers? Why is everyone with a 970 who I've asked this reporting the same results?
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352304 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:37 AM
System specific issue.
Just asked a steam friend who has a 970, no issues on latest drivers.
If everyone was having the same issue for the past half dozen drivers, there would be an outrage, which there isn't.
In fact, you are the first I've seen of this issue.
A 980 Ti is not a 970? What system issues? Why does everything magically work fine when reverting drivers? Why is everyone with a 970 who I've asked this reporting the same results?
System specific issue.
Just asked a steam friend who has a 970, no issues on latest drivers.
If everyone was having the same issue for the past half dozen drivers, there would be an outrage, which there isn't.
In fact, you are the first I've seen of this issue.
Andrew LB
Senior Member
Posts: 997
Joined: 2012-05-22
Senior Member
Posts: 997
Joined: 2012-05-22
#5352414 Posted on: 10/29/2016 03:29 PM
System specific issue.
Just asked a steam friend who has a 970, no issues on latest drivers.
If everyone was having the same issue for the past half dozen drivers, there would be an outrage, which there isn't.
In fact, you are the first I've seen of this issue.
That isn't the least bit accurate. There have been tons of articles and people claiming older cards are being crippled intentionally by the latest drivers. While i personally have not seen any evidence to support these claims, your immediate reaction to his comment was strangely reminiscent of how anyone who raised this concern was pretty much shouted down in an almost organized effort.
http://www.pcinvasion.com/60-of-pc-invasion-readers-think-nvidia-crippled-kepler-for-witcher-3
http://www.overclock.net/t/1557755/nvidia-neglecting-kepler-driver-optimization-or-downright-crippling-them
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=399211
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4bpb3y/does-nvidia-actually-make-their-older-cards-worse/
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
System specific issue.
Just asked a steam friend who has a 970, no issues on latest drivers.
If everyone was having the same issue for the past half dozen drivers, there would be an outrage, which there isn't.
In fact, you are the first I've seen of this issue.
That isn't the least bit accurate. There have been tons of articles and people claiming older cards are being crippled intentionally by the latest drivers. While i personally have not seen any evidence to support these claims, your immediate reaction to his comment was strangely reminiscent of how anyone who raised this concern was pretty much shouted down in an almost organized effort.
http://www.pcinvasion.com/60-of-pc-invasion-readers-think-nvidia-crippled-kepler-for-witcher-3
http://www.overclock.net/t/1557755/nvidia-neglecting-kepler-driver-optimization-or-downright-crippling-them
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=399211
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4bpb3y/does-nvidia-actually-make-their-older-cards-worse/
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
zipper
Senior Member
Posts: 1002
Joined: 2005-03-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1002
Joined: 2005-03-14
#5352430 Posted on: 10/29/2016 04:02 PM
Not crippled in my case - my Kepler 680M gets the best results on 3DMark11 and Fire Strike with the 375.xx drivers
Not crippled in my case - my Kepler 680M gets the best results on 3DMark11 and Fire Strike with the 375.xx drivers
BarryB
Senior Member
Posts: 1163
Joined: 2007-07-11
Senior Member
Posts: 1163
Joined: 2007-07-11
#5352494 Posted on: 10/29/2016 06:39 PM
Drivers are optimised to give the best results in benchmarks, results in games is another matter entirely!
Not crippled in my case - my Kepler 680M gets the best results on 3DMark11 and Fire Strike with the 375.xx drivers
Drivers are optimised to give the best results in benchmarks, results in games is another matter entirely!
zipper
Senior Member
Posts: 1002
Joined: 2005-03-14
Senior Member
Posts: 1002
Joined: 2005-03-14
#5352498 Posted on: 10/29/2016 06:56 PM
Of course, and for the newest hard/software - I'm just happy my old hardware still works well enough; better than with the original 306.14.
Of course, and for the newest hard/software - I'm just happy my old hardware still works well enough; better than with the original 306.14.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352502 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:03 PM
why is it they have to make a new driver release (that everyone call's day1 support) with every new game being released lately ?.
I know drivers have to have bugs fixes with the driver but with every big game title ?
Is each new game release that much different they have to reprogram the driver for the game ? seems daft they have to go through so much ars!ng around.
what drivers are the game Devs using while making the game do they have to update as often as end users?
why is it they have to make a new driver release (that everyone call's day1 support) with every new game being released lately ?.
I know drivers have to have bugs fixes with the driver but with every big game title ?
Is each new game release that much different they have to reprogram the driver for the game ? seems daft they have to go through so much ars!ng around.
what drivers are the game Devs using while making the game do they have to update as often as end users?
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352506 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:11 PM
That isn't the least bit accurate. There have been tons of articles and people claiming older cards are being crippled intentionally by the latest drivers. While i personally have not seen any evidence to support these claims, your immediate reaction to his comment was strangely reminiscent of how anyone who raised this concern was pretty much shouted down in an almost organized effort.
http://www.pcinvasion.com/60-of-pc-invasion-readers-think-nvidia-crippled-kepler-for-witcher-3
http://www.overclock.net/t/1557755/nvidia-neglecting-kepler-driver-optimization-or-downright-crippling-them
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=399211
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4bpb3y/does-nvidia-actually-make-their-older-cards-worse/
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
lol witcher 3 and a bunch of old threads.
It's a fact, witcher 3 did not get an optimized code path for kepler.
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
New architectures get more attention, like it's always been.
People who don't understand technology and how drivers work will make up conspiracy theories like that.
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
That isn't the least bit accurate. There have been tons of articles and people claiming older cards are being crippled intentionally by the latest drivers. While i personally have not seen any evidence to support these claims, your immediate reaction to his comment was strangely reminiscent of how anyone who raised this concern was pretty much shouted down in an almost organized effort.
http://www.pcinvasion.com/60-of-pc-invasion-readers-think-nvidia-crippled-kepler-for-witcher-3
http://www.overclock.net/t/1557755/nvidia-neglecting-kepler-driver-optimization-or-downright-crippling-them
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=399211
https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4bpb3y/does-nvidia-actually-make-their-older-cards-worse/
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/831639/nvidia-is-deliberately-downgrading-kepler-gpus-performance-in-favor-of-maxwell-/
lol witcher 3 and a bunch of old threads.
It's a fact, witcher 3 did not get an optimized code path for kepler.
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
New architectures get more attention, like it's always been.
People who don't understand technology and how drivers work will make up conspiracy theories like that.
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352513 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:42 PM
I had a love then hate for my GTX970's lol when I look back I so wish I just bought the GTX980 first off ...
still live and learn. lol
end up with the r9 390x although it's in the "it'll do" segment as AMD fans are used to I guess.
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
I had a love then hate for my GTX970's lol when I look back I so wish I just bought the GTX980 first off ...
still live and learn. lol
end up with the r9 390x although it's in the "it'll do" segment as AMD fans are used to I guess.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352536 Posted on: 10/29/2016 08:53 PM
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352542 Posted on: 10/29/2016 09:25 PM
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. Honestly at this point you sound like you work for nVidia. They way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
I hear yea fella, sold my 2 970's for the price of one.
I said it before so I will say it again, there is a lot of elitism on this forum by certain members ..
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. Honestly at this point you sound like you work for nVidia. They way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
I hear yea fella, sold my 2 970's for the price of one.
I said it before so I will say it again, there is a lot of elitism on this forum by certain members ..
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352554 Posted on: 10/29/2016 09:47 PM
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352576 Posted on: 10/29/2016 10:54 PM
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11335
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352593 Posted on: 10/30/2016 12:01 AM
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
Yep, it's NVs fault for publishing incorrect specs, people had every right to be be mad.
But it still technically had 4GB and could use it.
Still best bang for buck card since the 8800GT
But anyways, NV is #1 priority is to make money.
They're not going to waste time and resources to gimp a specific card, makes absolutely zero sense.
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
Yep, it's NVs fault for publishing incorrect specs, people had every right to be be mad.
But it still technically had 4GB and could use it.
Still best bang for buck card since the 8800GT
But anyways, NV is #1 priority is to make money.
They're not going to waste time and resources to gimp a specific card, makes absolutely zero sense.
Margalus
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: 2016-07-09
Senior Member
Posts: 182
Joined: 2016-07-09
#5352604 Posted on: 10/30/2016 12:28 AM
No, it's real world performance in every single game I tested from modern games to ****ing League of Legends. When you lose 15 frames a second in a game you can barely maintain 60 fps, that's a problem.
And no, I'm not the only one reporting performance falling off a cliff after the 368 drivers.
Something else is wrong with your system then. I have 2 systems, one with a 980Ti and another with a 970. The newest drivers are as good as or better than the older 368 you are still using.
No, it's real world performance in every single game I tested from modern games to ****ing League of Legends. When you lose 15 frames a second in a game you can barely maintain 60 fps, that's a problem.
And no, I'm not the only one reporting performance falling off a cliff after the 368 drivers.
Something else is wrong with your system then. I have 2 systems, one with a 980Ti and another with a 970. The newest drivers are as good as or better than the older 368 you are still using.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 2811
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 2811
Joined: 2008-09-07
#5352613 Posted on: 10/30/2016 01:34 AM
There's always a glut of new drivers when we get major title releases all crammed together using different and/or proprietary game engines.
Over the last 5 weeks, we've had:
Titanfall2, modified Source game engine.
BF1, modified Frostbite3 branch from Battlefront.
Gears of War, Unreal Engine 4.11 branch.
Sid Meier’s Civilization V, Fraxis proprietary engine.
Forza Horizon 3, Turn 10 Studio's generic DX12 engine.
And, lest we not forget it's christmas, and ironing out the rough spots before santa steals your ginger wine and eats your cookies, is a good thing.
There's always a glut of new drivers when we get major title releases all crammed together using different and/or proprietary game engines.
Over the last 5 weeks, we've had:
Titanfall2, modified Source game engine.
BF1, modified Frostbite3 branch from Battlefront.
Gears of War, Unreal Engine 4.11 branch.
Sid Meier’s Civilization V, Fraxis proprietary engine.
Forza Horizon 3, Turn 10 Studio's generic DX12 engine.
And, lest we not forget it's christmas, and ironing out the rough spots before santa steals your ginger wine and eats your cookies, is a good thing.
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9124
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352625 Posted on: 10/30/2016 03:01 AM
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.No, I said every driver above 368 I've tested ruined my performance. The entire point was to ask if anyone has tested a one which works properly, which I did. And those links weren't even from me, but brings up a good point. When the 700 series performance went down the toilet anyone who brought it up was met by rabid fanboys.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
My performance fell off a cliff. Would you like to me to spend hours reinstalling those drivers, recording individual videos and taking screenshots to prove it? Obviously that's sarcasm, I'm not going to spend any more time, especially to prove that nVida... NVIDIA of all people are being ****ters.
It doesn't need to be intentional, they've crippled the 970 at least at one point with their crappy releases. If someone breaks someone's leg that's still crippling regardless of if it was intentional. Do you think nVidia will pay their software developers to fix bugs in their drivers that affect old hardware that could still potentially hold back buyers from getting their new? Of course not. If it's been fixed by now, it sure as hell isn't out of the goodness of nVidia's heart, it's because it was necessary for another reason.
Still best bang for buck card since the 8800GT
The 8800GT was how much, $200-$250? Any decent model of the 970 was well over $400 here. Double the price of the 8800GT, the fact that anyone could consider that as "bang for the buck" shows how ****ed the ecosystem is.
Something else is wrong with your system then. I have 2 systems, one with a 980Ti and another with a 970. The newest drivers are as good as or better than the older 368 you are still using.
I haven't tested any new drivers in quite a while which is why I was asking in this thread.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.No, I said every driver above 368 I've tested ruined my performance. The entire point was to ask if anyone has tested a one which works properly, which I did. And those links weren't even from me, but brings up a good point. When the 700 series performance went down the toilet anyone who brought it up was met by rabid fanboys.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
My performance fell off a cliff. Would you like to me to spend hours reinstalling those drivers, recording individual videos and taking screenshots to prove it? Obviously that's sarcasm, I'm not going to spend any more time, especially to prove that nVida... NVIDIA of all people are being ****ters.
It doesn't need to be intentional, they've crippled the 970 at least at one point with their crappy releases. If someone breaks someone's leg that's still crippling regardless of if it was intentional. Do you think nVidia will pay their software developers to fix bugs in their drivers that affect old hardware that could still potentially hold back buyers from getting their new? Of course not. If it's been fixed by now, it sure as hell isn't out of the goodness of nVidia's heart, it's because it was necessary for another reason.
Still best bang for buck card since the 8800GT
The 8800GT was how much, $200-$250? Any decent model of the 970 was well over $400 here. Double the price of the 8800GT, the fact that anyone could consider that as "bang for the buck" shows how ****ed the ecosystem is.
Something else is wrong with your system then. I have 2 systems, one with a 980Ti and another with a 970. The newest drivers are as good as or better than the older 368 you are still using.
I haven't tested any new drivers in quite a while which is why I was asking in this thread.
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 460
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 460
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5352690 Posted on: 10/30/2016 11:10 AM
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
No idea about the other claims, but I have to say I'm still on 368.81 also since every driver since gives me issues
Is it my imagination or has nVidia been pumping out drivers at a more rapid pace in the last month?
I'm still on 368.81 since the driver I tested after that shat all over my card's performance. Doing that testing took way more time than I have to spend just to see if my games will perform as well as before.
Can anyone verify if there are any non-crippled drivers for the 900 series after the 368 branch?
No idea about the other claims, but I have to say I'm still on 368.81 also since every driver since gives me issues
2 pages 1 2
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2019
Senior Member
Posts: 1163
Joined: 2007-07-11
Ha! The return of GFE