MS Flight Simulator (2020): the 2021 PC graphics performance benchmark review
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
GeForce 375.70 WHQL driver download
on: 10/28/2016 02:06 PM [ 28 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 375.70 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA.
Game Ready Drivers provide the best possible gaming experience for all major new releases, including Virtual Reality games. Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix is included for the best gameplay on day-1.
Game Ready
Provides the optimal experience for Titanfall 2, Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare Remastered, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Special Edition, Obduction, and Dishonored 2
Application SLI Profiles
Added or updated the following SLI profiles:
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands - added temporal SLI profile
Game Ready VR
Provides the optimal experience for Obduction
Game Ready
Provides the optimal experience for Battlefield 1, Civilization VI, and Titanfall 2
Game Ready VR
Provides the optimal VR experience for Eagle Flight and Serious Sam VR: The Last Hope
We have a discussion thread open on this driver right here.
Gaming Technology
Supports the new GeForce GTX 10-series GPUs powering gaming notebooks
Supported desktop cards:
GeForce 10 Series
NVIDIA TITAN X (Pascal), GeForce GTX 1080, GeForce GTX 1070, GeForce GTX 1060, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 635, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
GeForce 500 Series
GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510
GeForce 400 Series
GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420
Have you read our Nvidia Titan X (Pascal) Review already?
6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Neo Cyrus
Senior Member
Posts: 9698
Joined: 2006-02-14
Senior Member
Posts: 9698
Joined: 2006-02-14
#5352536 Posted on: 10/29/2016 07:53 PM
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
People who said they purposely tried to gimp kepler are crazy; they just didn't put much effort into optimizing it.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
Plus the fact that he thinks NV is purposely cripping GTX 970s also makes zero sense because all maxwell cards use the same DX code paths.
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352542 Posted on: 10/29/2016 08:25 PM
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. Honestly at this point you sound like you work for nVidia. They way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
I hear yea fella, sold my 2 970's for the price of one.
I said it before so I will say it again, there is a lot of elitism on this forum by certain members ..
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. Honestly at this point you sound like you work for nVidia. They way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
I hear yea fella, sold my 2 970's for the price of one.
I said it before so I will say it again, there is a lot of elitism on this forum by certain members ..
Agent-A01
Senior Member
Posts: 11396
Joined: 2010-12-27
Senior Member
Posts: 11396
Joined: 2010-12-27
#5352554 Posted on: 10/29/2016 08:47 PM
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
They put pretty much none. Which is intentional, and they knew the results would be catastrophic, but they did it anyway. It's curious the way you just dismiss anything negative about a known crap company, who has been caught multiple times doing shady BS as, "crazy".
I never outright said that or said it's intentional. The reality is the performance on a 970 (mine and all those who I asked) has been **** after the 368 branch of drivers.
You say "system specific issues" as if this magically and commonly happens. It should be pretty obvious what could cause such a massive problem if it really is anything but the drivers, yet no one including you have any ideas.
And if nVidia really wanted to cripple the 970, which would make a lot more sense considering the volume of that outweighs all other Maxwell cards combined, then it could be done so easily. So what they used the same X or Y or anything. On the driver side it can easily be set to run like garbage for any specific card.
A 20%+ drop in performance goes beyond negligence, stop trying to victim blame, it's not some magic system specific problem. It's widespread, it's widely reported. How could I have possibly been the first you heard of it when I've seen people talk of it in the driver release threads here before I ever tried of those drivers? If it was some problem one specific branch that's been fixed, I guess I'll eventually find out, but I'm not willing to do 3 hours of testing to find out.
Stop saying "no it's you" as if we're some retarded scrubs who don't know anything. If the drivers are plummeting in performance due to something "specific" with that system, it's still a problem with the drivers. No matter how you try to cut it. nVidia's latest drivers have destroyed the performance of the 970, intentional or not, you can victim blame, call us "crazy" (while offering zero actual information) all you want but that's a fact.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
stevevnicks
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2014-10-02
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2014-10-02
#5352576 Posted on: 10/29/2016 09:54 PM
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
You said anything above 368 cripples maxwell.
I said you were the first I've heard of it from, then you link me 5 threads to witcher 3.
I am not denying the fact they didn't have optimized drivers for witcher 3...
Not optimizing for a new game for an older architecture is not "purposely crippling" anything.
Driver optimization for
Yet there are these people who think NV is going to pay driver engineers to purposely implement a mechanism to nerf an architecture are plainly ignorant.
So again, please show me facts where there are crippling 970s.
You spout it's hard fact, everyone with 970 is having issues, etc.
I have asked a few with 970s and again, nobody has any specific issues.
368 branch has been out for half a year, so again, no it's not a widespread issue.
I wouldn't know of driver issues but I remember having issues with SLI 3xAOC 1080P monitors and 3.5g Vram partition issue which everyone shouted down, like the chap said it almost felt like it was well organized defend attack.
With the Vram some at first even denied the issue ever existed, no matter what proof you put up ..
Not saying they Gimp driver although nothing would surprise me with Nvidia Or AMD these days.
6 pages 1 2 3 4 5 6
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2021
Senior Member
Posts: 1440
Joined: 2014-10-02
I had a love then hate for my GTX970's lol when I look back I so wish I just bought the GTX980 first off ...
still live and learn. lol
end up with the r9 390x although it's in the "it'll do" segment as AMD fans are used to I guess.