ASUS ROG GeForce RTX 2070 STRIX review
Corsair K70 RGB MK.2 Low Profile RAPIDFIRE review
Battlefield V: PC graphics performance benchmarks
Apacer Panther Rage DDR4 RGB 3200 MHz DDR4 review
ASUS ROG STRIX Z390-E Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 2070 Gaming Z review
Corsair H115i Platinum review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - October 2018
Cooler Master MasterCase SL600M review
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX review
GeForce 362.00 WHQL driver download
on: 03/01/2016 02:56 PM [ 18 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the Nvidia GeForce GameReady 362.00 WHQL driver as released by NVIDIA.
Prior to a new title launching, our driver team is working up until the last minute to ensure every performance tweak and bug fix possible makes it into the Game Ready driver. As a result, you can be sure you’ll have the best day-1 gaming experience for your favorite new titles.Learn more about how to get the optimal experience for Gears of War: Ultimate Edition, Far Cry Primal, and the latest update for Dying Light.
DriverVer = 02/23/2016, 10.18.13.6200
GeForce 900 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN X, GeForce GTX 980 Ti, GeForce GTX 980, GeForce GTX 970, GeForce GTX 960, GeForce GTX 950
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN Z, GeForce GTX TITAN Black, GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780 Ti, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770, GeForce GTX 760, GeForce GTX 760 Ti (OEM), GeForce GTX 750 Ti, GeForce GTX 750, GeForce GTX 745, GeForce GT 740, GeForce GT 730, GeForce GT 720, GeForce GT 710, GeForce GT 705
GeForce 600 Series
GeForce GTX 690, GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 670, GeForce GTX 660 Ti, GeForce GTX 660, GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST, GeForce GTX 650 Ti, GeForce GTX 650, GeForce GTX 645, GeForce GT 645, GeForce GT 640, GeForce GT 630, GeForce GT 620, GeForce GT 610, GeForce 605
GeForce 500 Series
GeForce GTX 590, GeForce GTX 580, GeForce GTX 570, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, GeForce GTX 560 SE, GeForce GTX 560, GeForce GTX 555, GeForce GTX 550 Ti, GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 530, GeForce GT 520, GeForce 510
GeForce 400 Series
GeForce GTX 480, GeForce GTX 470, GeForce GTX 465, GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, GeForce GTX 460 SE, GeForce GTX 460, GeForce GTS 450, GeForce GT 440, GeForce GT 430, GeForce GT 420
Have you read our Liquid Cooled Gigabyte WaterForce GTX 980 Ti review already ?
hexaae
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2013-06-07
Member
Posts: 27
Joined: 2013-06-07
#5238157 Posted on: 03/01/2016 04:07 PM
Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.
Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.
Deasnutz
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
#5238203 Posted on: 03/01/2016 05:21 PM
It is lame. I don't expect Nvidia to fully support dx12 for a long time. Anything that can improve performance other than a new gpu is bad for Nvidia.
Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.
It is lame. I don't expect Nvidia to fully support dx12 for a long time. Anything that can improve performance other than a new gpu is bad for Nvidia.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5238212 Posted on: 03/01/2016 05:34 PM
I don't get it, what kind of support are you looking for? What do you mean by "fully support"? Fable Legends, Ashes and now Gears all run relatively well on Nvidia's hardware. What more support are they supposed to give?
Sigh 6 months of just Game Ready drivers... And Windows 10 dx12 and WDDM2.0 are still badly supported by these Win7 hacked drivers.
It is lame. I don't expect Nvidia to fully support dx12 for a long time. Anything that can improve performance other than a new gpu is bad for Nvidia.
I don't get it, what kind of support are you looking for? What do you mean by "fully support"? Fable Legends, Ashes and now Gears all run relatively well on Nvidia's hardware. What more support are they supposed to give?
Deasnutz
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
#5238232 Posted on: 03/01/2016 06:18 PM
The type AMD is giving and is poised to continue. I can't argue with the bare minimum you are touting. Save it for a fanboy.
I don't get it, what kind of support are you looking for? What do you mean by "fully support"? Fable Legends, Ashes and now Gears all run relatively well on Nvidia's hardware. What more support are they supposed to give?
The type AMD is giving and is poised to continue. I can't argue with the bare minimum you are touting. Save it for a fanboy.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5238242 Posted on: 03/01/2016 06:31 PM
AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10.
So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?
The type AMD is giving and is poised to continue. I can't argue with the bare minimum you are touting. Save it for a fanboy.
AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10.
So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5238249 Posted on: 03/01/2016 06:46 PM
Nice, glad to see async support enabled
Nice, glad to see async support enabled
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 9166
Joined: 2014-07-21
Senior Member
Posts: 9166
Joined: 2014-07-21
#5238283 Posted on: 03/01/2016 07:44 PM
And here we are again....
And here we are again....
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
Senior Member
Posts: 11603
Joined: 2004-05-16
#5238291 Posted on: 03/01/2016 08:04 PM
Yeah, I reported him.
And here we are again....
Yeah, I reported him.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5238323 Posted on: 03/01/2016 09:10 PM
I would advise to not visit the nvidia forums.
Yeah, I reported him.
I would advise to not visit the nvidia forums.
Deasnutz
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
Senior Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 2013-10-01
#5238354 Posted on: 03/01/2016 09:55 PM
AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10.
So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?
Wait, they are having problems with a new feature that has never been used on the platform on a game not even released a day? Shocking. At least they offer the feature, instead of a fake version only to stick "dx12 compatible" on a box.
AMD practically wrote the specification for DX12 and even they are having problems. Look at Async support in AoS on the Fury X, it scales negatively at 1080p. Or look at the recent V-Sync problem they are having in AoS shown in Guru3D's review and now confirmed by PC Perspective. Or today, they released GoW Ultimate Edition and the performance on AMD's cards across the board is an issue. And this isnt even to say that AMD' support is bad, it's fine. The Gears issue is probably in conjunction with MS and the other issues are all probably easily fixable. But you guys make it sound like Nvidia cards are unusable or something in Windows 10.
So I ask again, exactly what support Nvidia is currently lacking and how exactly is that support in anyway meaningful to the overall user experience?
Wait, they are having problems with a new feature that has never been used on the platform on a game not even released a day? Shocking. At least they offer the feature, instead of a fake version only to stick "dx12 compatible" on a box.
GeniusPr0
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
Senior Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: 2003-04-26
#5238379 Posted on: 03/01/2016 10:30 PM
I've already abandoned ship. Sold my desktop. If only AMD kept up on the mobile side. Hoping Polaris will do well otherwise it's Pascal mobile for me.
Wait, they are having problems with a new feature that has never been used on the platform on a game not even released a day? Shocking. At least they offer the feature, instead of a fake version only to stick "dx12 compatible" on a box.
I've already abandoned ship. Sold my desktop. If only AMD kept up on the mobile side. Hoping Polaris will do well otherwise it's Pascal mobile for me.
Artefact
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
#5238498 Posted on: 03/02/2016 01:41 AM
Almost one year will pass and still no directx12 wddm 2.0 driver for fermi gtx 400 and 500....nvidia this is very disappointing
Almost one year will pass and still no directx12 wddm 2.0 driver for fermi gtx 400 and 500....nvidia this is very disappointing
scipio
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 2005-01-18
Senior Member
Posts: 4640
Joined: 2005-01-18
#5238500 Posted on: 03/02/2016 01:49 AM
Hey mr nuts please post in the pub...
Hey mr nuts please post in the pub...
Artefact
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
#5238505 Posted on: 03/02/2016 02:00 AM
I had write post in nvidia latest driver tread,so i dont see any issue. Latest driver and still does not have dx12 wddm 2.0 why nvidia ignore 10 percent of global users,they had promise support for Fermi
I had write post in nvidia latest driver tread,so i dont see any issue. Latest driver and still does not have dx12 wddm 2.0 why nvidia ignore 10 percent of global users,they had promise support for Fermi
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5238526 Posted on: 03/02/2016 03:27 AM
Wait, you're expecting new Direct X architecture to work on 4 and 5 series nvidia cards? Ummmm
Almost one year will pass and still no directx12 wddm 2.0 driver for fermi gtx 400 and 500....nvidia this is very disappointing
Wait, you're expecting new Direct X architecture to work on 4 and 5 series nvidia cards? Ummmm
Artefact
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
Senior Member
Posts: 41
Joined: 2016-03-02
#5238527 Posted on: 03/02/2016 03:39 AM
They had promise dx12 wddm 2.0 and still ignoring gtx 400 and 500 users, we have basic dx12 hardware support. Even Vulkan api can work but nvidia refuse to give
Wait, you're expecting new Direct X architecture to work on 4 and 5 series nvidia cards? Ummmm
They had promise dx12 wddm 2.0 and still ignoring gtx 400 and 500 users, we have basic dx12 hardware support. Even Vulkan api can work but nvidia refuse to give
Irenicus
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-05-03
Senior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: 2015-05-03
#5238547 Posted on: 03/02/2016 04:25 AM
I just find it strange, I mean those cards are getting pretty old now, I wouldn't expect anyone to even attempt to run more modern games on them at decent frame rates. You'd be better off even with a 6xx series card and those don't have dx12 support either. Maybe I'm just misinformed. If they have indeed promised dx12 support from them, then that blows that they haven't delivered
They had promise dx12 wddm 2.0 and still ignoring gtx 400 and 500 users, we have basic dx12 hardware support. Even Vulkan api can work but nvidia refuse to give
I just find it strange, I mean those cards are getting pretty old now, I wouldn't expect anyone to even attempt to run more modern games on them at decent frame rates. You'd be better off even with a 6xx series card and those don't have dx12 support either. Maybe I'm just misinformed. If they have indeed promised dx12 support from them, then that blows that they haven't delivered
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2018
Senior Member
Posts: 9166
Joined: 2014-07-21
See also HERE for additional driver discussion.