Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Corsair 2000D RGB Airflow Mini-ITX - PC chassis review
ASUS PG27AQDM Review - 240Hz 1440p OLED monitor
MSI MAG X670E Tomahawk WiFi review
Mountain Makalu Max mouse review
GeForce 326.01 WHQL Windows 8.1 Driver Download
on: 06/29/2013 11:27 AM [ 16 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download the official 326.01 WHQL Windows 8.1 Preview Driver Downloads. Since a few users have reported this driver did not show up in their Windows Update, NVIDIA is releasing them separately so that users may have access to them.
If you already installed these drivers and are not experiencing any issues, you do not need to reinstall these drivers below. If however you did not see this driver through Windows Update and had to install a modified version, we ask that you first attempt a clean install using the driver below. Many support cases we receive from end users are easily solved by performing a clean install.
Please post your feedback on this driver right here. This driver supports Windows Vista, 7, 8.
Release Summary
This is a WHQL-certified GeForce driver for the Windows 8.1 Preview.
Supported products
GeForce 700 series:
GTX TITAN, GTX 780, GTX 770, GTX 760
GeForce 600 series:
GTX 690, GTX 680, GTX 670, GTX 660 Ti, GTX 660, GTX 650 Ti, GTX 650, GT 645, GT 640, GT 630, GT 620, GT 610, 605
GeForce 500 series:
GTX 590, GTX 580, GTX 570, GTX 560 Ti, GTX 560 SE, GTX 560, GTX 555, GTX 550 Ti, GT 545, GT 530, GT 520, 510
GeForce 400 series:
GTX 480, GTX 470, GTX 465, GTX 460 v2, GTX 460 SE v2, GTX 460 SE, GTX 460, GTS 450, GT 440, GT 430, GT 420, 405
GeForce 300 series:
GT 340, GT 330, GT 320, 315, 310
GeForce 200 series:
GTX 295, GTX 285, GTX 280, GTX 275, GTX 260, GTS 250, GTS 240, GT 240, GT 230, GT 220, G210, 210, 205
GeForce 100 series:
GT 140, GT 130, GT 120, G 100
GeForce 9 series:
9800 GX2, 9800 GTX/GTX+, 9800 GT, 9600 GT, 9600 GSO, 9600 GS, 9500 GT, 9500 GS, 9400 GT, 9400, 9300 GS, 9300 GE, 9300, 9200, 9100
GeForce 8 series:
8800 Ultra, 8800 GTX, 8800 GTS 512, 8800 GTS, 8800 GT, 8800 GS, 8600 GTS, 8600 GT, 8600 GS, 8500 GT, 8400 SE, 8400 GS, 8400, 8300 GS, 8300, 8200 / nForce 730a, 8200, 8100 / nForce 720a
ION series:
ION LE, ION
Tagged as:
download 326.01 WHQL
4 pages 1 2 3 4
Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 880
Joined: 2013-01-11
Senior Member
Posts: 880
Joined: 2013-01-11
#4627834 Posted on: 07/29/2013 12:55 PM
I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93.
And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)
I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93.
And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)
Mineria
Senior Member
Posts: 5537
Joined: 2007-05-05
Senior Member
Posts: 5537
Joined: 2007-05-05
#4627837 Posted on: 07/29/2013 01:05 PM
I use the Dell UltraSharp U2913WM for gaming etc.
Really like the extra width, but I would have prefered it to be a bit larger than 29", since the height of the display is considerable smaller then what it is on my 27" 16:9 LG.
Only issue I found is when watching Netflix, they don't support 21:9.
@NAMEk
Input lag is fine for general gaming, Iv'e even seen som of the professional StarCraft II players prefering IPS panels.
I mainly use mine for mmo's and racing games, but I do play a few fps titles too, like FarCry 3, ShootMania etc., and really don't feel like their is any input-lag going on, but I had to use some time to setup the monitor, like using the correct profiles, using v-sync on my games etc.
You can notice that a 120Hz is faster, but if you don't play fps on pro level and prefer extra width, better colors and black levels, then you will enjoy these newer IPS panels a lot more than a 120Hz.
Oh, and I can recommend any one with a newer mobo that has a LucidLogic onboard chip to invest in the MVP software, it really gives a nice steady picture in games with their v-syn option on IPS panels.
I use the Dell UltraSharp U2913WM for gaming etc.
Really like the extra width, but I would have prefered it to be a bit larger than 29", since the height of the display is considerable smaller then what it is on my 27" 16:9 LG.
Only issue I found is when watching Netflix, they don't support 21:9.
@NAMEk
Input lag is fine for general gaming, Iv'e even seen som of the professional StarCraft II players prefering IPS panels.
I mainly use mine for mmo's and racing games, but I do play a few fps titles too, like FarCry 3, ShootMania etc., and really don't feel like their is any input-lag going on, but I had to use some time to setup the monitor, like using the correct profiles, using v-sync on my games etc.
You can notice that a 120Hz is faster, but if you don't play fps on pro level and prefer extra width, better colors and black levels, then you will enjoy these newer IPS panels a lot more than a 120Hz.
Oh, and I can recommend any one with a newer mobo that has a LucidLogic onboard chip to invest in the MVP software, it really gives a nice steady picture in games with their v-syn option on IPS panels.
Loobyluggs
Senior Member
Posts: 5028
Joined: 2008-09-07
Senior Member
Posts: 5028
Joined: 2008-09-07
#4627870 Posted on: 07/29/2013 02:03 PM
I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93.
And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)
21x9 is actually 2.33:1 aspect ratio (divide 21 by 9)
16x9 is 1.78:1
There are no hard and fast rules for what a cinematographer/director will decide to do with aspect ratios.
Movie can be between 1.3 (Old/rare) and even the ultra rare and wide 4.0 - but the happy medium is 2.75.
Django unchained had 2.35:1
'A Good Day to Die Hard' had 1.85:1 (practically 16x9)
I have no problems with the reaction time and input lag with the ea93.
And it is true 21:9 cause movies let show the 2.35.1 (21:9)
21x9 is actually 2.33:1 aspect ratio (divide 21 by 9)
16x9 is 1.78:1
There are no hard and fast rules for what a cinematographer/director will decide to do with aspect ratios.
Movie can be between 1.3 (Old/rare) and even the ultra rare and wide 4.0 - but the happy medium is 2.75.
Django unchained had 2.35:1
'A Good Day to Die Hard' had 1.85:1 (practically 16x9)
makaveli316
Senior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 2012-09-28
Senior Member
Posts: 168
Joined: 2012-09-28
#4627960 Posted on: 07/29/2013 06:07 PM
I'd still prefer to watch a movie on my big a*s smart tv.
I'd still prefer to watch a movie on my big a*s smart tv.
4 pages 1 2 3 4
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Guru3D.com © 2023
Senior Member
Posts: 658
Joined: 2006-05-26
Actually this is 64:27 for square pixels. And i wonder what's the input lag, if it's less than 15ms, it's for me, if not then not. I would love to have 3360x1440 29" <- this is 21:9.