Final Fantasy XV Windows Edition Benchmark Download November DLSS Update

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 11/16/2018 09:29 AM [ 36 comment(s) ]

Advertisement

You can now download the Final Fantasy XV Windows Edition Benchmark, this official benchmark software uses actual maps and playable characters to assign a score to your PC and rate its performance. The benchmark application can give you a score to indicate the level of performance you can expect from your PC environment when running.

It does this by displaying several of the events, maps and characters used in the game. The FFXV Official Benchmark launcher will boot up when you click on " Official Benchmark" from either the Windows start menu or a desktop shortcut. After adjusting the various settings, push the start button to initiate the Benchmark compatibility test.

For the insiders, this benchmark and title does have Nvidia game works written all over it.

Native 4K and HDR10 support.

Support for 4K (3840 x 2160px) and HDR display allows you to experience even more atmospheric high-quality graphics.

An OS with the Windows 10 Creators Update or later and a compatible monitor are required to use HDR display.

NVIDIA GameWorks

This application allows you to check your PC's compatibility with the latest graphical effects provided by NVIDIA.

* An NVIDIA graphics card is required to run NVIDIA Ansel.

Once the Benchmark compatibility test is completed, you can check your score. This score is a value that indicates the standard of performance you can expect when running the full release version of FINAL FANTASY XV WINDOWS EDITION on your PC. See below for a breakdown of what the scores mean.

12000 or greater	Extremely High	The game will run exceedingly well. A high frame rate is possible and even richer graphical settings can be used.
9000 to 11999	Very High	You can expect the game to run very comfortably. A high frame rate is possible and even higher quality graphical settings can be used.
6000 to 8999	High	You can expect the game to run comfortably. It should run smoothly, even at higher graphics settings.
4500 to 5999	Fairly High	A standard level of performance can be expected. Adjustments to the graphics settings are recommended if possible.
3000 to 4499	Standard	A standard level of performance can be expected.
2500 to 2999	Slightly Low	It is possible to play the game, but you may experience a burden on processing when performing some actions. Adjustments to the graphics settings are recommended.
2000 to 2499	Low	It is possible to play the game, but all actions will feel sluggish overall. There is a chance that the performance may improve with adjustments to the graphics settings or display resolution.
0 to 1999	Insufficient	The system does not meet the minimum requirements to run the game.

* This index is for reference purposes only and does not constitute a guarantee that the release version of the game will run on the PC.

Change Info:
November DLSS Update (November 15th, 2018) This new version adds NVIDIA DLSS Support

Download Locations

Download from Author [ 27953 downloads | Report broken link ]

Download Mirror EU - Germany (1 Gbit/s) [ 11407 downloads | Report broken link ]

Download Mirror EU - Netherlands (10 Gbit/s) [ 12341 downloads | Report broken link ]

2 pages 1 2

FAQU
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: 2017-10-25

#5516360 Posted on: 02/02/2018 08:15 AM

The benchmark seems to be inconsistent on my RX 480 (jumping from 20fps to 80fps , then back to 20fps) , and there are tons of graphical glitches (missing textures , shadows randomly appear and disappear) .

Update:
- The problems mentioned above were caused by Freesync . I disabled Freesync , and everything ran fine afterwards .

- With Standard Quality and 1920x1080 i scored 6404 (High) ; i7 6700 - 16GB DDR4 - RX 480 8GB

Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Joined: 2013-01-11

#5516387 Posted on: 02/02/2018 10:19 AM

Release date? DX12 only?

kilyan
Senior Member
Posts: 579
Joined: 2004-03-08

#5516401 Posted on: 02/02/2018 10:39 AM

fx 8350+gtx 1080: considering i'm bottlenecked i didn't expect such good results: 1920x1080 high,af16x,max performance gpu profile, v-sync application controlled i scored 7100(7400 was the reference score for my gpu) and i got the high mark. I tried also 4k on high and i scored 4100 and got a standard mark.

kilyan
Senior Member
Posts: 579
Joined: 2004-03-08

#5516402 Posted on: 02/02/2018 10:50 AM

Release date? DX12 only?

release is due to march the 6th and will play also on dx 11

Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3695
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5516457 Posted on: 02/02/2018 01:36 PM

On my desktop I scored over 7000 with my maxed out OC GTX 1070 (+105core +500 mem) and I was getting flickering and some artifacts and thats @ 1080p High settings but when I actually play GPU intensive games I got none of that. On my gaming laptop with a GTX 1060 6GB with a light OC on high settings I was getting occasional freezes.

kilyan
Senior Member
Posts: 579
Joined: 2004-03-08

#5516467 Posted on: 02/02/2018 02:21 PM

it seems setting high performance in driver solves the suttering and freezes, at least did for me

Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3695
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5516474 Posted on: 02/02/2018 02:40 PM

it seems setting high performance in driver solves the suttering and freezes, at least did for me

Thanks for the info Will give it another go.

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16294
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5516527 Posted on: 02/02/2018 05:40 PM

vbetts
Moderator
Posts: 14517
Joined: 2006-07-04

#5516560 Posted on: 02/02/2018 07:40 PM

Release date? DX12 only?

Even if it was, most enthusiasts have a more modern machine that is DX12 capable.

Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3695
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5516581 Posted on: 02/02/2018 08:20 PM

Yeah, I had to make a new profile in nvinspector then adjust power and frames 2, threaded opt on.. to go from stutter to slight jitter at those scenes, it goes away completely if you run it 2x.

As for artifacts, lower vram or gpu Oc.. try 3dmark 2011 test 2 and 4 @Extreme setting.. that is a quick indicator.. especially for vram, next skydiver in new 3d mark. The oddest thing during Standard game play of GPU intensive games I don't get any flickering or artifacts of any kind and I did try rerunning the benchmark at stock speeds +0 on both core and mem and I didn't get any flickering or artifacts. I did run the newest 3dmark when I got my repaired card back and it was stable and the same thing goes with the Valley Benchmark as well.

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16294
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5516596 Posted on: 02/02/2018 08:50 PM

The oddest thing during Standard game play of GPU intensive games I don't get any flickering or artifacts of any kind and I did try rerunning the benchmark at stock speeds +0 on both core and mem and I didn't get any flickering or artifacts. I did run the newest 3dmark when I got my repaired card back and it was stable and the same thing goes with the Valley Benchmark as well.

sammarbella
Senior Member
Posts: 3931
Joined: 2014-12-09

#5516605 Posted on: 02/02/2018 09:08 PM

DX12 is fine but ofc mGPU support is not present.
That would be a miracle specially been a Japanese console port.

Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3695
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5516628 Posted on: 02/02/2018 10:12 PM

Well, standard is still less demanding.. That's why I also suggested 3dmark11 extreme present instead of standard.
I think that vram oc is a bit too much, or a combo of both. Minimal 10-20mhz adjustments. Well I stand corrected. My OC was not stable and I was able to get it stable @ +75 on the core and +380 on the mem. From +105 and +500.

KissSh0t
Senior Member
Posts: 6850
Joined: 2011-10-22

#5516660 Posted on: 02/03/2018 12:06 AM

If anyone wanted to compare against my system, I'm sure most will beat it.

Keesberenburg
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Joined: 2013-01-11

#5516750 Posted on: 02/03/2018 08:50 AM

HDR works very nice in this benchmark.

altemecya
Junior Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 2018-02-03

#5516871 Posted on: 02/03/2018 06:23 PM

On my i5 stock clock with R9 290 I've got score 4300. Boost my i5 at 4.45ghz and i got lower score wich is 3800.

And now I'm officially confused, can some one tell me what the hell happened.

Fender178
Senior Member
Posts: 3695
Joined: 2004-09-28

#5516890 Posted on: 02/03/2018 07:28 PM

On my i5 stock clock with R9 290 I've got score 4300. Boost my i5 at 4.45ghz and i got lower score wich is 3800.

And now I'm officially confused, can some one tell me what the hell happened. Hmm that is odd. Alot of people here and other places are saying that the game isn't optimized yet and there might be a game ready driver for the game when the game is released or Just before.

vestibule
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 2014-04-21

#5516910 Posted on: 02/03/2018 08:42 PM

Hmm. Clearly if they can release the game optimised then all will be well. The demo is basically on par with Farcry primal which is now nicely optimised.
The Demo as in un-optimised requires no where near as much resources as resident evil7 or Rise of the tomb raider and yet still runs fairly poorly.

julianssss
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2018-02-04

#5517017 Posted on: 02/04/2018 08:16 AM

My result looks pretty wired...1080Ti 11GB, 8700K with 32GB 3600 Hz Ram only get merely pass the standard under 4K (4400 Windowed, 5000 Fullsceen), can score fairly high in 1080p (Score: 6000 Full screen)

julianssss
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 2018-02-04

#5517028 Posted on: 02/04/2018 09:41 AM

I guess we are in the same boat lol
http://benchmark.finalfantasyxv.com/result/?i=5260093615a769fdc616e0&Resolution=1920x1080&Quality=High
Looks like my spec is lower than 1070 result from the official statistics..

db87
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 2014-06-19

#5517064 Posted on: 02/04/2018 01:13 PM

Once again Nvidia got caught sabotaging the performance using Nvidia GameWorks :mad:

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16294
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5517090 Posted on: 02/04/2018 03:20 PM

Hah, I knew there was something fishy going on, but this bad? .. fail.

KissSh0t
Senior Member
Posts: 6850
Joined: 2011-10-22

#5517094 Posted on: 02/04/2018 03:32 PM

It's only the highest setting that uses gameworks though isn't it?

-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16294
Joined: 2012-05-18

#5517096 Posted on: 02/04/2018 03:34 PM

Yes @ high.. but even at standard it apparently renders all that extra hidden stuff, ok minus hairworks and silly turf grass here and there..

From what I saw so far they did a poor job representing this new FFXV engine.

Angantyr
Senior Member
Posts: 609
Joined: 2013-11-23

#5517105 Posted on: 02/04/2018 04:17 PM

From what I saw so far they did a poor job representing this new FFXV engine.

Yeah, and that's a shame, really is. And after watching the video DB linked, it does seem like this benchmark was a rushed project, which in the end, doesn't benefit anyone.

My expectations for the game are somewhat scaled back now since the announcement, but I do hope it'll perform better than the benchmarks representation. At least the game comes out with mod support, which is probably a big benefit in this case.

2 pages 1 2

Post New Comment

Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.