Fractal Design Define 7 Compact review
Lian Li Galahad 360 liquid cooler review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - July 2020
Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 3600 MHz (64GB) review
Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited)
Kioxia Exceria 960 GB SATA3 SSD review
HP Portable P500 1TB Portable USB3 SSD review
EK-Quantum Magnitude WaterBlock Review
Death Stranding: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Deepcool DQ850-M-V2L 850 W PSU review
Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward Benchmark Download
on: 04/29/2015 12:47 PM [ 12 comment(s) ]
Advertisement
Download Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward Benchmark. If you're a fan of Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn, or simply want a new tool to measure your system's performance, you should definitely download the freshly-released Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward Benchmark. The benchmark works in DirectX 9 and DirectX 11, with plenty of settings to opt.
Featuring content from the forthcoming, eponymous expansion that raises the MMORPG's max level to 60 and adds a ton of new content, the Heavensward Benchmark also introduces gamers to a new DirectX 11 renderer and new visual effects, which include HBAO+.
If you're unfamiliar with HBAO+, the DirectX 11-powered technique adds contact shadows where two surfaces or objects meet, and where an object blocks light from reaching another nearby game element. Compared to other ambient occlusion techniques, HBAO+'s shadows are more accurate and more detailed, and have a comparatively low performance impact, making games appear more realistic without a huge hit to your precious framerate. In the Final Fantasy XIV: Heavensward Benchmark, HBAO+ more accurately shades characters, NPCs, objects, terrain, foliage, and grass.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Benchmark Software Overview
| Operating System | Windows Vista/7/8 * DirectX 9.0c or higher required.
** This benchmark is not available on Mac OS. * Minimum resolution 1024x720 |
| File Name | ffxiv-heavensward-bench.zip |
| File Size | Approx. 1.6GB |
| [7000+] Extremely High Performance |
Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. |
| [5000-6999] Very High Performance |
Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions. |
| [3500-4999] High Performance |
Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions. |
| [2500-3499] Fairly High Performance |
Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. |
| [2000-2499] Standard Performance |
Capable of running the game on default settings. |
| [1500-1999] Slightly Low Performance – Changes to Settings Recommended |
Capable of running the game, but will experience slowdown. Adjusting settings may improve performance. |
| [1000-1499] Low Performance – Changes to Settings Required |
Capable of running the game, but will experience considerable slowdown. Adjusting settings is unlikely to improve performance. |
| [Under 1000] Insufficient Performance |
Does not meet specifications for running the game. |
3 pages 1 2 3
riardon
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2014-05-03
Member
Posts: 65
Joined: 2014-05-03
#5060325 Posted on: 04/29/2015 04:02 PM
Very nice benchmark with beautiful scenery. I like that is a "real" graphic engine from a real game and not a theoretical one.
Very nice benchmark with beautiful scenery. I like that is a "real" graphic engine from a real game and not a theoretical one.
bombardier
Senior Member
Posts: 233
Joined: 2004-07-18
Senior Member
Posts: 233
Joined: 2004-07-18
#5060432 Posted on: 04/29/2015 06:04 PM
"FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/29/2015 6:11:21 PM
Score: 13083
Average Frame Rate: 99.902
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.707 sec
Scene #2 5.822 sec
Scene #3 3.980 sec
Scene #4 4.210 sec
Scene #5 3.678 sec
Scene #6 2.140 sec
Total Loading Time 21.541 sec
DAT:s20150429181121.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: High Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
8137.762MB
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 13083 1920x1080 Custom DX11 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 13083 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Score: 13083 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 13083
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 13083 Extremely High
1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980"
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (VRAM 3072 MB)????????
"FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Tested on: 4/29/2015 6:11:21 PM
Score: 13083
Average Frame Rate: 99.902
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Loading Times by Scene
Scene #1 1.707 sec
Scene #2 5.822 sec
Scene #3 3.980 sec
Scene #4 4.210 sec
Scene #5 3.678 sec
Scene #6 2.140 sec
Total Loading Time 21.541 sec
DAT:s20150429181121.dat
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Screen Mode: Full Screen
DirectX Version: 11
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Wet Surface Effects: Enabled
-Occlusion Culling: Enabled
-LOD on Distant Objects: Disabled
-Real-time Reflections: Highest Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Edge Smoothing (Anti-aliasing): FXAA
-Transparent Lighting Quality: High
-Grass Quality: High
-Background Tessellation: High Quality
-Water Tessellation: High Quality
Shadows
-Self: Display
-Other NPCs: Display
Shadow Quality
-LOD on Shadows: Disabled
-Shadow Resolution: High - 2048p
-Shadow Cascading: Best
-Shadow Softening: Strong
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering: Anisotropic
-Anisotropic Filtering: x16
Movement Physics
-Self: Full
-Other NPCs: Full
Effects
-Limb Darkening: Enabled
-Radial Blur: Enabled
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion: HBAO+: High Quality (DirectX 11 Only)
-Glare: Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Depth of Field: Enabled
System
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.150316-1654)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
8137.762MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (VRAM 3072 MB) 9.18.0013.5012
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn (Windows version) and FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward (Windows version) will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/pr/
(C) 2010-2015 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Share Results
Type 1
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 13083 1920x1080 Custom DX11 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Type 2
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score: 13083 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
Type 3
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Score: 13083 Extremely High
Type 4
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV 1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen Score: 13083
Full Results
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Heavensward Benchmark
Score: 13083 Extremely High
1920x1080 Custom DirectX11 Full Screen
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980"
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (VRAM 3072 MB)????????
slyphnier
Senior Member
Posts: 756
Joined: 2009-11-30
Senior Member
Posts: 756
Joined: 2009-11-30
#5060439 Posted on: 04/29/2015 06:13 PM
Loved this benchmark. I know it is nothing top of the line but I believe this game to be well made and has come a long way. However my PC had very little issue handling itself at max everything dx11.
aside graphic, gameplay is **** ... no offense but i was a long ff14 player
content all copying wow or other mmo
and the worst is they (dev.team) basically create a design that "stressing" player than giving player "enjoyment"
its like u go to end-contents, weekly limited for luck based loot... it can be 3months long without getting anything ... while other people/friends can get all they end content equip straight up in just 2-3weeks and there like nothing to do till next patch...
seriously not sure even the dev.team have brains in game design ...
luck-factor in game is fun factor if not overly used
then now they started selling stuff, mount-minion-etc. to get more profit..
also for graphic, imo "black dessert" abit better, and everything in there abit more fresh (eventhough the basic still all same)
Loved this benchmark. I know it is nothing top of the line but I believe this game to be well made and has come a long way. However my PC had very little issue handling itself at max everything dx11.
aside graphic, gameplay is **** ... no offense but i was a long ff14 player
content all copying wow or other mmo
and the worst is they (dev.team) basically create a design that "stressing" player than giving player "enjoyment"
its like u go to end-contents, weekly limited for luck based loot... it can be 3months long without getting anything ... while other people/friends can get all they end content equip straight up in just 2-3weeks and there like nothing to do till next patch...
seriously not sure even the dev.team have brains in game design ...
luck-factor in game is fun factor if not overly used
then now they started selling stuff, mount-minion-etc. to get more profit..
also for graphic, imo "black dessert" abit better, and everything in there abit more fresh (eventhough the basic still all same)
Megabiv
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
Senior Member
Posts: 798
Joined: 2006-09-14
#5060526 Posted on: 04/29/2015 07:47 PM
aside graphic, gameplay is **** ... no offense but i was a long ff14 player
content all copying wow or other mmo
and the worst is they (dev.team) basically create a design that "stressing" player than giving player "enjoyment"
its like u go to end-contents, weekly limited for luck based loot... it can be 3months long without getting anything ... while other people/friends can get all they end content equip straight up in just 2-3weeks and there like nothing to do till next patch...
seriously not sure even the dev.team have brains in game design ...
luck-factor in game is fun factor if not overly used
then now they started selling stuff, mount-minion-etc. to get more profit..
also for graphic, imo "black dessert" abit better, and everything in there abit more fresh (eventhough the basic still all same)
While I do agree that the end content drops can be crappy with a weekly lockout and RNG, the devs are actually paying attention to user feedback and introducing a token system so that even if you don't get your drop you will still get it eventually via the tokens. As for the store comment, well WOW has no problem charging £20+ for a mount or the character boost and in comparison the FFXIV store is cheaper with the most expensive item on there is the Odin mount at £10~. All items sold there are cosmetic and don't give any players an advantage over others in buying them so i don't see a problem (although it's always a hot subject). In my opinion I'd rather they sell the items they do in the store for a bit more profit to improve the game than have to turn it into a "Free to Play" cash wall.
aside graphic, gameplay is **** ... no offense but i was a long ff14 player
content all copying wow or other mmo
and the worst is they (dev.team) basically create a design that "stressing" player than giving player "enjoyment"
its like u go to end-contents, weekly limited for luck based loot... it can be 3months long without getting anything ... while other people/friends can get all they end content equip straight up in just 2-3weeks and there like nothing to do till next patch...
seriously not sure even the dev.team have brains in game design ...
luck-factor in game is fun factor if not overly used
then now they started selling stuff, mount-minion-etc. to get more profit..
also for graphic, imo "black dessert" abit better, and everything in there abit more fresh (eventhough the basic still all same)
While I do agree that the end content drops can be crappy with a weekly lockout and RNG, the devs are actually paying attention to user feedback and introducing a token system so that even if you don't get your drop you will still get it eventually via the tokens. As for the store comment, well WOW has no problem charging £20+ for a mount or the character boost and in comparison the FFXIV store is cheaper with the most expensive item on there is the Odin mount at £10~. All items sold there are cosmetic and don't give any players an advantage over others in buying them so i don't see a problem (although it's always a hot subject). In my opinion I'd rather they sell the items they do in the store for a bit more profit to improve the game than have to turn it into a "Free to Play" cash wall.
3 pages 1 2 3
Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this file on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 29
Joined: 2015-01-16
Loved this benchmark. I know it is nothing top of the line but I believe this game to be well made and has come a long way. However my PC had very little issue handling itself at max everything dx11.