Corsair H170i Elite Capellix XT review
Forspoken: PC performance graphics benchmarks
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review





We take a look at The Division 2 (2019) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
« Corsair Carbide 678C review · The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
· Synology DS1019+ Gigabit NAS Review »
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
kilyan
Senior Member
Posts: 604
Senior Member
Posts: 604
Posted on: 03/15/2019 02:19 PM
The dx 12 issues i encountered in the beta are still present: occasional micro freezes here and there, and the lighting going crazy. They fixed at least the random crashes
The dx 12 issues i encountered in the beta are still present: occasional micro freezes here and there, and the lighting going crazy. They fixed at least the random crashes
SpajdrEX
Senior Member
Posts: 3075
Senior Member
Posts: 3075
Posted on: 03/15/2019 02:40 PM
I think that the Vignette effect being disabled could fix most of the lighting issues.
I think that the Vignette effect being disabled could fix most of the lighting issues.
warlord
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Senior Member
Posts: 2760
Posted on: 03/15/2019 03:07 PM
1660 slower than 590 and 1660ti slower than 1070. Great showing for new gtx turing cards.
Overall game runs good on a decent hardware it seems.
And radeon vii is destroyed by 2080. Vega is so old news.
1660 slower than 590 and 1660ti slower than 1070. Great showing for new gtx turing cards.
Overall game runs good on a decent hardware it seems.
And radeon vii is destroyed by 2080. Vega is so old news.
HybOj
Senior Member
Posts: 264
Senior Member
Posts: 264
Posted on: 03/15/2019 03:12 PM
Radeon VII same as 1080ti in 1080p and better in anything above. Not bad. Considering 1080ti was last ok card from nVidia in terms of performance and perf/buck ratio.
Too bad u cant buy neither VII or 1080ti now... LOL!
Too expensive for me anyway.
But to me, VII looks better than 1080ti (16gb HBM2) Thats not THAT bad and not THAT old news..
Also, its barely released and will work better in time.
Game runs "ok"...
Radeon VII same as 1080ti in 1080p and better in anything above. Not bad. Considering 1080ti was last ok card from nVidia in terms of performance and perf/buck ratio.
Too bad u cant buy neither VII or 1080ti now... LOL!
Too expensive for me anyway.
But to me, VII looks better than 1080ti (16gb HBM2) Thats not THAT bad and not THAT old news..
Also, its barely released and will work better in time.
Game runs "ok"...
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 20787
1660 slower than 590 and 1660ti slower than 1070. Great showing for new gtx turing cards.
Overall game runs good on a decent hardware it seems.