GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG review
Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro review
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO review
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 TUF Gaming review
GeForce RTX 3080 Founder review
Gigabyte B550 Vision D review
HP EX900 PRO 1TB NVMe SSD review
GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 and 3090 preview & analysis
Be Quiet! Dark Power Pro 12 - 1500 Watt PSU Review
ASUS ProArt PA278QV Monitor Review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
Posted by: on: 01/27/2020 10:44 AM [
16 comment(s) ]
Fast, faster fastest? We review the GALAX HOF 1TB PCIe Gen 4.0 SSD. It reaches the fastest transfer rates we have seen thus far at 5 GB/sec. Of course, it is an SSD you can seat into any PCIe 3.0 compatible PC, however, if you place it into a Ryzen 3000 / X570 based PC, some magic happens as you are running 4000 to 5000 MB/s numbers and higher, thanks to the new PCIe 4.0 interface and a little TLC from Phison, well Toshiba strictly speaking.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
galax
pages 1 2 3 4
Mda400
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Senior Member
Posts: 836
Posted on: 01/27/2020 03:32 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Storage device manufacturers in year 3000 will still be saying a GB is 1000 MB. hahaha 
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
tunejunky
Senior Member
Posts: 987
Senior Member
Posts: 987
Posted on: 01/27/2020 03:58 PM
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
another great review HH.
i feel like a Ferengi learning the rules of acquisition, cuz i'm a greedy lil' pup who likes shiny.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 10776
Senior Member
Posts: 10776
Posted on: 01/27/2020 04:43 PM
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
It has to due with how data transfer is calculated, usually with networking involving bits to bytes calculation.
But this gets confused when talking about non-networking products that typically talk in the "byte" value. Even typing 5000 MB to GB in duckduckgo, gives me a result of 5GB... It's 5,120 MB that equal 5 GB.
Please don't.
Kool64
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Posted on: 01/27/2020 05:15 PM
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
It looks pretty cool but given my primary M.2 slot is buried squarely under my video card I'd be hard pressed to wonder if they charged extra for the white PCB and "fancy" heat sink.
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1138
Same 4k random read @qd=1 performance as samsung Sm951 nvme released in 2015.
Looks like there is no need to upgrade for a bit higher seq read and write yet
.