ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D OC review
Enermax Aquafusion 360 review LCS
Intel Core i5 11400F processor review
Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro SL 3600 MHz 32GB review
ASRock Z590 Extreme review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6700 XT Gaming OC review
Corsair K70 RGB TKL keyboard review
Corsair RM650x (2021) power supply review
be quiet! Silent Loop 2 280mm review
Corsair K55 RGB PRO XT keyboard review
Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD review




We review the Crucial X8 SSD (1TB). This, by far, among the fastest portable storage to date as it is NVMe based, combined with the DNA of NMVe it can reach 1050 MB/sec over USB 3.2 Gen2.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
crucial
« Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited) · Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD review
· AMD Ryzen 9 3950X review »
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 1152
Senior Member
Posts: 1152
Posted on: 11/22/2019 02:43 PM
SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICK...... Great review as always @Hilbert Hagedoorn ..... Keep up the solid work!.!
Just one question on performance as to why the low score on the ISO movement portion??
Is an issue with the QLC and the compression?
SIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICK...... Great review as always @Hilbert Hagedoorn ..... Keep up the solid work!.!
Just one question on performance as to why the low score on the ISO movement portion??
Is an issue with the QLC and the compression?
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40663
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 40663
Posted on: 11/22/2019 08:10 PM
I would not call 500~600 MB/sec over USB3 a low score. But for the same reasons explained in the conclusion, at one point the QLC/TLC write hole kicks in.
Just one question on performance as to why the low score on the ISO movement portion??
I would not call 500~600 MB/sec over USB3 a low score. But for the same reasons explained in the conclusion, at one point the QLC/TLC write hole kicks in.
DeskStar
Senior Member
Posts: 1152
Senior Member
Posts: 1152
Posted on: 11/23/2019 03:34 AM
Not low in the "normal" sense, but as in comparison is all. Wanted to make sure what I was thinking..."QLC" does/did it's worst at that point.
I would not call 500~600 MB/sec over USB3 a low score. But for the same reasons explained in the conclusion, at one point the QLC/TLC write hole kicks in.
Not low in the "normal" sense, but as in comparison is all. Wanted to make sure what I was thinking..."QLC" does/did it's worst at that point.
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Senior Member
Posts: 1528
Posted on: 12/05/2019 11:07 AM
We review the Crucial X8 SSD (1TB). This, by far, among the fastest portable storage to date as it is NVMe based, combined with the DNA of NMVe it can reach 1050 MB/sec over USB 3.2 Gen2. Read the f...
Review: Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD - USB3 at 1 GB/sec
Wrong thread, sorry. Delete this post if necessary.
We review the Crucial X8 SSD (1TB). This, by far, among the fastest portable storage to date as it is NVMe based, combined with the DNA of NMVe it can reach 1050 MB/sec over USB 3.2 Gen2. Read the f...
Review: Crucial X8 1TB Portable SSD - USB3 at 1 GB/sec
Wrong thread, sorry. Delete this post if necessary.
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 9793
I think QLC on something like this is an okay IMO. Even if you were to use it as a expansion hard drive for a console the number of writes would not be very high. My 1TB 600p tha I use as a game drive has 1/5 the number of TB written compared to my 500GB 970evo I use for OS.