Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Radeon Series RX 6700 XT preview & analysis
Corsair MM700 & Corsair Katar Pro XT Review
Guru3D Rig of the Month - February 2021
ASUS GeForce RTX 3060 STRIX Gaming OC review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming X TRIO review
PALIT GeForce RTX 3060 DUAL OC review
ZOTAC GeForce RTX 3060 AMP WHITE review
Fractal Design Meshify 2 Compact chassis review
Sabrent Rocket 4 PLUS 2TB NVMe SSD review

New Downloads
ClockTuner for Ryzen (CTR) v2.0 RC4 Download
SiSoft Sandra 20/21 download v31.12
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: DCH 27.20.100.9316
AIDA64 Download Version 6.32.5644 beta
FurMark Download v1.25
MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable Download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.3.7
Guru3D RTSS Rivatuner Statistics Server Download 7.3.0 Final
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v1.9.10 Download
GeForce 461.72 WHQL driver download


New Forum Topics
Download: MSI Afterburner 4.6.3 Final Stable release My experience with 4-way Sli thus far MSI has released Motherboard BIOS's for AGESA 1.2.0.0 Samsung to release variant of Odyssey G9 monitor with miniled backlight and much more Should I sell it? AMD confirms that Resident Evil Village will have Ray Tracing support on PC AMD announces Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB at 479 USD, launches on March 18th Heat problem? RTX 30xx Drivers on Windows 8.1? AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 2020 Edition 21.2.3




Guru3D.com » Review » Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 09/06/2018 11:54 AM [ 103 comment(s) ]

In this quick article, we'll check out some graphics cards with Battlefield V Open Beta. The performance is a mixed bag, the however is shaping up to be something really good.

Read article


Advertisement



« MSI MEG X399 Creation review · Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks · Seagate Fast SSD 1TB review »

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Embra
Senior Member



Posts: 1126
Posted on: 09/06/2018 12:21 PM
Interesting the Vega performance seems lacking at 1080p & 1440p, yet take a jump at 4K.

Thank you HH! :)

Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone



Posts: 40311
Posted on: 09/06/2018 12:27 PM
Yeah I know, in its current state it's just so difficult to measure. I've placed many disclaimers in the article, and in fact, have been doubting to even post it as really numbers are all over the place depending on where you are on a map and indeed resolution. Better something than nothing I figured. Once the final game is out I can streamline a good path/scene to measure in, precisely.

These results, I've given it to be a preliminary and indicative classification, not a precise one.

Fox2232
Senior Member



Posts: 11518
Posted on: 09/06/2018 12:38 PM
Yeah I know, in its current state it's just so difficult to measure. I've placed many disclaimers in the article, and in fact, have been doubting to even post it as really numbers are all over the place depending on where you are on a map and indeed resolution. Better something than nothing I figured. Once the final game is out I can streamline a good path/scene to measure in, precisely.

These results, I've given it to be a preliminary and indicative classification, not a precise one.
Not really surprising. In one of dev. team talk they said something weird. That, they have bad performance from using many instantiated objects. And instead they try to combine as much geometry under one instance as possible.

That should not be problem, but it looks like their solution is choking AMD's driver or cards somehow and preventing them from fully utilizing brute part of architecture. That bottleneck is likely "removed" by higher resolution as there is more brute force work required than there is load on bottlenecking serial operation.

May be anything, but my guess would be geometry discard as they make those objects complex.

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 13234
Posted on: 09/06/2018 12:53 PM
I wonder what it is about Frostbite that makes DX12 such a mess. You'd think the team that requested/helped AMD build an entire low level API would be the best at DX12 and yet they are somehow one of the worst.

I guess we'll see when the final build ships and numbers updated but the performance/stuttering mentioned doesn't look any better than their previous DX12 implementations.

fantaskarsef
Senior Member



Posts: 12057
Posted on: 09/06/2018 01:06 PM
I don't know about DX12 with the Frostbyte engine... I tend to wonder the same as you @Denial , especially as they are actively working together with Nvidia to implement RTX, which is DX12. But to what use if the DX12 adaption itself is lacking? Maybe they should first fix their DX12 "container" itself before thinking about RTX performance numbers, since those are crippled by, well being DX12 on Nvidia and Frostbyte in the first place.

pages 1 2 3 4 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks 5

Guru3D.com © 2021