Red Dead Redemption 2: PC graphics benchmark review (revisited) - Game performance 1920x1080 (Full HD)

Game  performance 1920x1080 (Full HD)

The game offers several quality settings and modes. At 1920x1080 even entry-level to mainstream graphics cards achieve very good frame-rates at the best possible settings. Visually there is little difference in-between the normal to the most complex mode settings. Let's start with Full HD test the graphics cards based on the quality settings we've shown you. 

Please Note: Framerates vary in different scenes. This is also the reason what on one website the results are lower/higher. Benchmarks are an indication of the scene we play in. Here's what we did, basically you shift that quality preset to level to the max. As you can see in Full HD, all cards are capable enough running that 60+ FPS domain.

Update:

We had some users wondering about the performance difference between the initial results and the new data-set. Now before you take a look at that, the results are not to be considered objective, but indicative only. We moved from in-game testing towards the internal benchmark. At the time that yielded little performance differences but still, that is a crucial difference, ergo initially I opted to not include that as a differential chart. Next to that in the original review, we tested DirectX 12 as leading API, whereas now VULKAN is the API of choice. Here again, the difference where and are extremely small. The performance differences reveal itself mostly at a resolution of 1920x1080, ergo the extra result set is now added based on reader request. You can examine how much perf gain after all the new driver updates and patches.

So again, the chart below is an indicative one, not an objective one. The cards with a 0 result that you see are cards that in the old data-set were not tested (as they had not been released back then). But yes, this is a rough estimation of how much performance changed over the past months. Ok, that's enough of a disclaimer right?