Core i9 12900K processor review -
Performance - CineBench 20
Challenges of testing a processor when there are no reference motherboards
Each year, it is getting increasingly complicated to test processor performance accurately; the motherboard manufacturers control many settings. On the other hand, Intel does not release reference review motherboards anymore; thus, motherboards manufacturers will do tons of tweaks 'at default' in the BIOS to stay ahead of the competition and spread their lineup relative for performance from mainstream towards premium. Settings can include All cores frequency locks, clock tweaks, and enhancements in power states and duration (PL2/Tau). For a motherboard review, this is all fine; however, we want to test as close as possible to reference performance for a processor review. To bypass these challenges, in the BIOS, we disable such features to remain as close as possible to reference performance. We expect you will see lots of reviews with higher or lower performance numbers as many media will load up BIOS defaults and start testing without checking. We thus test at reference performance (as close as possible) with settings as referenced by Intel. For motherboard reviews, we, of course, revert to motherboard defaults as it is well within their right to segment and optimize their lineup performance-wise.
Windows 10 or 11?
Please read - During the initiation of Alder Lake reviews, we have been faced with the fact that Alder Lake needs Windows 11 for its thread scheduler in order to work and function properly with the P and E cores. At that stage, we wanted to retest all processors and switch to Windows 11 for AMD Ryzen 5000 processors also. As you have learned, Microsoft did not support Ryzen properly when released. A week or so ago a series of patches were introduced to solve the bigger part of performance losses. Up-to-date, AMD performance on Windows 11 still is not on par with what it needs to be. Roughly 2~3% performance is still missing somewhere. With that fact in mind, we made the call to leave AMD performance results based on Windows 10 and solely use Windows 11 for Alder lake. This is a devil's dilemma, but using Ryzen 5000 results on an immature Windows 11 platform did not feel right or fair to AMD. Once the last bit of performance discrepancy has been fixed, we’ll update the results -- but at that stage, the AMD Ryzen 5000 performance in-between Windows 10 and 11 are not yet close to NIL, albeit with each week passing the differential is becoming more marginal.
Processor performance: CineBench 20
Maxon released their Cinebench R20 benchmark, more capable for dealing with the heavily threaded processors. You need a PC with at least 4 GB of memory and SSE3 instruction set support. Maxon states Cinebench R20 is now using four times the memory and eight times the CPU computational power compared to Cinebench R15.
Recently look at the performance differential between DDR5 6000 and 7200 MHz on Raptor-Lake, Intels Gen 13th series processors. Today we review a TeamGroup T-Force Delta 7200 CL34 (!) DDR5 kit to see...
Core i9 12900K DDR4 3600 vs DDR5 5200 performance review
Recently Intel released Alder Lake-based processor, the Core i9 12900K, and the platform is poised for the future with its incredibly fast performance paired with DDR5 memory, however works with DDR4 ...
Core i9 12900K processor review
Meet Intel's new flagship CPU, the Core i9 12900K. It is based on the Alder Lake architecture and is reviewed here. This time around, Intel was back at the drawing board, creating a completely new ar...
Intel Core i9 10980XE processor review
In this article, we'll review the all-new 18-core Core i9 10980XE from Intel. Despite many announcements, this is the most versatile (in cores) HEDT processor for the consumer market from intel, th...