Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Scythe Mugen 5 Rev.C CPU Cooler review
be quiet Pure Loop 2 FX 280mm LCS review
HP FX900 1 TB NVMe Review
Scythe FUMA2 Rev.B CPU Cooler review
SK Hynix Platinum P41 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD Review
Corsair K70 RGB PRO Mini Wireless review
MSI MPG A1000G - 1000W PSU Review
Goodram IRDM PRO M.2 SSD 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 30.0.101.1743
GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.5.4
FurMark Download v1.31
Intel HD graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.3222
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.7.1 driver download
GeForce 516.93 WHQL Studio driver download
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.26.110
ReShade download v5.3.0
AIDA64 Download Version 6.75


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA GeForce 516.94 WHQL driver download & Discussion JPR estimates Intel GPU unit losses at $3.5 billion, suggests selling it Fine Utilise Power of RadeonPRO Software & SweetFX Part 2 DDR5-6000 Memory is the Sweet Spot For AMD Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 CPUs Windows power plan settings explorer utility AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.7.1- Driver download and discussion RTX 3000 Series artifacts, black squares that flicker in desktop and 2D mode GeForce RTX 4080 and RTX 4070 same consumption as RTX 3080 and RTX 3070 but more performance Nvidia reduces revenue prediction due to video card demand. AMD Radeon Software - Preview Drivers - DCH/UWP




Guru3D.com » Review » Battlefield 1 PC graphics benchmark review » Page 6

Battlefield 1 PC graphics benchmark review - Graphics card performance 1080p

by Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 10/18/2016 02:37 PM [ 5] 124 comment(s)

Tweet

Graphics card performance

We test at ULTRA quality settings. Your sweet spot might be is high quality and 1080P if you have less then 3GB of graphics memory. 3GB graphics memory (often referred to as VRAM) really is a sweet-spot for the game. For PC gaming your goal always should be 60+ FPS. However, we say 40 FPS for any game should be your minimum threshold, while 60 FPS (frames per second) or higher can be considered optimal.
 
 

 
Processor wise we use a tweaked Core i7 5960X (8-cores @ 4.3 GHz). The game utilizes multiple cores, roughly eight of them are actively used. The processor is used on an X99 platform with 16GB quad-channel memory clocked at 2400 MHz.
  

Above an example of the game rendered at 2560x1440 with an GeForce GTX 1080 in Ultra quality mode.


Above you can see resolution scaling versus image quality settings, each step downwards in quality e.g. going from Low to Ultra quality bring significant performance gains. Most high-end and enthusiast cards can handle and HIGH and Ultra Quality settings quite easily up-to WQHD. All mainstream to high cards are advised to run at high quality settings up-to 2560x1440 if you have less then 4 GB of VRAM. As you can see their is an FPS ceiling (cap) at precisely 200 FPS.

But let's start the benchmarks at Full HD, the acronym for a pixel resolution of 1920x1080.
 

 
* Dark blue is DX12 - Light is DX11

The type of game you play is always relevant though, an first person shooter game is nice at 50 to 60 fps , an online shooter on a 144Hz monitor feels better at 100+ fps. And totally on the opposing side, for RPG gaming things are different for which we are comfortable with an FPS ranging as low as 30~35 FPS. At all times if your framerate is low, you can opt to change in-game image quality settings. Mind you that we test with reference cards or cards that have been clocked at reference frequencies. Factory tweaked graphics cards ovbiously can run up-to 20% faster. But for the generic overview, we treat all card the same.




11 pages « < 5 6 7 8 next »



Related Articles
Battlefield V: DLSS PC Performance Update
EA and DICE have added DLSS support for Battlefield V. Combined with a new 418.91 driver from NVIDIA we check out the benefits and disadvantages of what is called AI AA in this small first update with...

Battlefield V: PC graphics performance benchmarks
In this article, we'll check out graphics card performance with Battlefield. The AAA game titles released earlier and is looking to be a keeper....

Battlefield V Open Beta: PC performance benchmarks
In this quick article, we'll check out some graphics cards with Battlefield V Open Beta. The performance is a mixed bag, the however is shaping up to be something really good....

Battlefield 1 PC graphics benchmark review
It's that time of the year, EA is finally releasing Battlefield 1. We will look at the game in our geeky gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance...

© 2022