Death Stranding: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Deepcool DQ850-M-V2L 850 W PSU review
Kioxia Exceria PLUS 2TB M.2 NVMe SSD review
F1 2020: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Intel Core i7-10700K processor review
Deepcool Gamerstorm Castle 280EX liquid cooler review
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT review
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT review
Crucial P2 500 GB NVMe M2 SSD review
XFX Radeon RX 5600 XT (14Gbps) THICC II Pro review
Posted by: on: 05/08/2020 03:42 PM [
9 comment(s) ]
We test and review the new XFX Radeon RX 5600 XT THICC 2 Pro, no-no you're not having a Deja-Vu, this round we test the new 14 Gbps GDDR6 clocked version. This Radeon RX 5600 XT Pro revision is basically an RX 5700 however with 6GB of GDDR6 and lower clock frequencies. XFX gas a 12 Gbps and 14 Gbps GDDR6 SKU, this is the new a specific 14 Gbps SKU.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2
vbetts
Posts: 14975
Posts: 14975
Posted on: 05/12/2020 02:26 AM
Thanks Hilbert for the reviews.
Don't you agree with me that hardware performance reviews should use newer games that what you're using?
BFV is a dead game, Far Cry New Dawn is old now, how many players play Exodus?
Titles as COD MW 2019 for example is much more played game, maybe Forza too? But your list is getting old
Thanks
The games tested still tax hardware and are good representations of performance to expect. BFV is not an easy game on hardware still when you get into higher resolutions and post processing.
Thanks Hilbert for the reviews.
Don't you agree with me that hardware performance reviews should use newer games that what you're using?
BFV is a dead game, Far Cry New Dawn is old now, how many players play Exodus?
Titles as COD MW 2019 for example is much more played game, maybe Forza too? But your list is getting old
Thanks
The games tested still tax hardware and are good representations of performance to expect. BFV is not an easy game on hardware still when you get into higher resolutions and post processing.
itpro
Senior Member
Posts: 153
Senior Member
Posts: 153
Posted on: 05/12/2020 02:46 AM
Games' date is not a proper variable. Reviews are about a wide spectrum of titles with taxing graphics and future-proof tech. Also, do not forget sometimes there are licence limitations plus headaches for the reviewer, more time consumption. Reviews give you a glimpse of the relative performance. For specific titles you can make the math (by calculating percentages) .
Games' date is not a proper variable. Reviews are about a wide spectrum of titles with taxing graphics and future-proof tech. Also, do not forget sometimes there are licence limitations plus headaches for the reviewer, more time consumption. Reviews give you a glimpse of the relative performance. For specific titles you can make the math (by calculating percentages) .
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38339
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 38339
Posted on: 05/12/2020 10:44 AM
Don't you agree with me that hardware performance reviews should use newer games that what you're using?
BFV is a dead game, Far Cry New Dawn is old now, how many players play Exodus?
Titles as COD MW 2019 for example is much more played game, maybe Forza too?
Unfortunately, not all games are well suited for consistent benchmarking or have save points that start-up (spawn) in exactly the same scenery, COD, for example, never outs the same results when you measure performance. I am continuously on the lookout for games that can be added and replace older ones. However, they need to be reliable and consistent.
Also, I face the fact that one reader wants this, the other wants that. You mention adding new games, but then mention Forza, which is from 2018 I think? So that's a personal preference for what you like to see (and there's nothing wrong with that of course). At one point I removed the Witcher III from the test suite, which upset some readers. So we keep including it. That's the same with BF-V, until that game is replaced with BF-VI we'll keep including it. A review gives you a representation of performance where I try to mix old, new, and some GPU demanding titles (like Exodus).
Don't you agree with me that hardware performance reviews should use newer games that what you're using?
BFV is a dead game, Far Cry New Dawn is old now, how many players play Exodus?
Titles as COD MW 2019 for example is much more played game, maybe Forza too?
Unfortunately, not all games are well suited for consistent benchmarking or have save points that start-up (spawn) in exactly the same scenery, COD, for example, never outs the same results when you measure performance. I am continuously on the lookout for games that can be added and replace older ones. However, they need to be reliable and consistent.
Also, I face the fact that one reader wants this, the other wants that. You mention adding new games, but then mention Forza, which is from 2018 I think? So that's a personal preference for what you like to see (and there's nothing wrong with that of course). At one point I removed the Witcher III from the test suite, which upset some readers. So we keep including it. That's the same with BF-V, until that game is replaced with BF-VI we'll keep including it. A review gives you a representation of performance where I try to mix old, new, and some GPU demanding titles (like Exodus).
pages 1 2
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 655
Thanks Hilbert for the reviews.
Don't you agree with me that hardware performance reviews should use newer games that what you're using?
BFV is a dead game, Far Cry New Dawn is old now, how many players play Exodus?
Titles as COD MW 2019 for example is much more played game, maybe Forza too? But your list is getting old
Thanks