Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
ASRock Z790 Taichi review
The Callisto Protocol: PC graphics benchmarks
G.Skill TridentZ 5 RGB 6800 MHz CL34 DDR5 review
Be Quiet! Dark Power 13 - 1000W PSU Review
Palit GeForce RTX 4080 GamingPRO OC review
Core i9 13900K DDR5 7200 MHz (+memory scaling) review
Seasonic Prime Titanium TX-1300 (1300W PSU) review
F1 2022: PC graphics performance benchmark review
MSI Clutch GM31 Lightweight​ (+Wireless) mice review
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor review

New Downloads
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4091
Corsair Utility Engine Download (iCUE) Download v4.33.138
CPU-Z download v2.04
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.1.2 (RX 7900) download
GeForce 528.24 WHQL driver download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.0
Download Intel network driver package 27.8
ReShade download v5.6.0
Media Player Classic - Home Cinema v2.0.0 Download
HWiNFO Download v7.36


New Forum Topics
AMD Announces Pricing and Availability for Ryzen 7000X3D Series Processors RTX 4090 Owner's thread Ryzen 5600 all core boost is low AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 22.11.2 - Driver download and discussion Cyberpunk 2077 NVIDIA DLSS 3 Update Is Out Now GeForce 528.33 CUDA Toolkit 12.0 Update 1 Samsung Issues new Firmware to prevent Dying 980 Pro SSDs Nvidia Set to Unveil RTX 4060 and 4050 GPUs Ahead of Schedule? Netflix threatens to ban customers who share an account unauthorized Extreme 4-Way Sli Tuning




Guru3D.com » Review » Windows Vulnerability CPU Meltdown Patch Benchmarked 5

Windows Vulnerability CPU Meltdown Patch Benchmarked 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 01/04/2018 06:18 PM [ 186 comment(s) ]

A quick look at that expected desktop performance drop after we install the Microsoft CPU Meltdown Vulnerability Patch. Will our test PC drop massively in performance?

Read article


Advertisement



« Corsair H115i PRO review · Windows Vulnerability CPU Meltdown Patch Benchmarked · ECS Liva Q Pocket Size PC review »

pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »

WareTernal
Senior Member



Posts: 259
Posted on: 01/04/2018 09:33 PM
It seems on Ryzen systems the performance hit it's bigger than on intel
Sounds like sloppy work by MS to include AMD in this mess. It's a shame if Ryzen is taking a hit for no reason.

im sorry but those test before and after look like there within "margin" of error
tell said people that response able for the flaw and fixing to fix it they have till so and so time to do so or this info will be released
Some of those results are within margin of error, but others have found similar results. If it was margin of error we would expect to see some higher numbers post patch. I think they did wait until patches were available before public disclosure.

The wolves are gonna be in cluster virtual machine environments, not for +/- 2% on futuremark.
What he said^. I appreciate the demonstration that this isn't going to affect my games, but what about a VM host with 10 VM's?

Primey0
Senior Member



Posts: 134
Posted on: 01/04/2018 09:49 PM
Ummmmm.... In order to full secure your PC you also need to update the CPU firmware.

That patch that Intel provides will be the one that impacts performance in certain workloads. Did you do this before the benchmarks? Because I think you're only benchmarking the windows 10 patch which isn't the patch that impacts performance

SoloCreep
Senior Member



Posts: 686
Posted on: 01/04/2018 10:46 PM
8700k here and no difference in FPS.

jaggerwild
Senior Member



Posts: 864
Posted on: 01/04/2018 10:52 PM
So I only performed one test on my system, and I would say that I get like 10% worse performance.

Core i7 2600K at 4 GHz, samsung 850 EVO ssd. The test is, in a ConEmu terminal under Windows, under Bash (from git-bash), I type this:


Weasis compilation:
Before patch: 53 seconds
After the patch: 105 seconds

Weasis is a Java viewer for X-Ray, CT-scan and CAT-scan file formats. This ConEmu + MinGW + bash + Maven + javac scenario probably touches quite a few different aspects of the operating system, from file access, to lookup, writes, compilation, the (few) Weasis tests, etc. I tested by restarting the computer, opening ConEmu and running the clean + install cycle 5-6 times until it stabilized.

Nobody cares!!!!!

They already stated the media over rated it to hype it up for hits, also Im not doing shoddy stuff on the internet. The patch could be a spy, good work man!

chispy
Senior Member



Posts: 9555
Posted on: 01/04/2018 11:08 PM
Hilbert if you can , test an AM4 Ryzen or Treadripper system on an SSD or NVMe. It seems Ryzen systems have taken a bigger hit on performance than Intel. Myself and a lot more members can confirm this by our own testing , it's all over the internet by now that degradation in performance on Ryzen systems is worst and more noticable than Intel.

pages « < 4 5 6 7 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » Windows Vulnerability CPU Meltdown Patch Benchmarked 5

Guru3D.com © 2023