PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon review
GALAX HOF Pro PCIe 4.0 NVMe review
How to: Firmware Update the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming Z review
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5600 XT OC review
ASUS STRIX Radeon RX 5600 XT TOP review
Gigabyte Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming OC review
Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280 liquid cooler review
Promo: Windows 10 Pro licenses for under 10 USD
Team Group MP33 NVMe 512 GB SSD Review
Watch Dogs VGA graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 05/26/2014 03:10 PM [
165 comment(s) ]
We benchmark Watch Dogs on the PC. Join us in this preliminary benchmark performance review where we look at this game from a graphic card point of view, with a handful of graphics cards. We look at DX11 performance and how well these cards perform versus image quality settings. We will also address the game problems with graphics memory.
Read article
Advertisement
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:25 PM
Call of Duty Ghosts VGA graphics card performance benchmarks?
soz couldn't resist
Aaargh, I used a article design template from an older article for this one. Fixed
Call of Duty Ghosts VGA graphics card performance benchmarks?
soz couldn't resist
Aaargh, I used a article design template from an older article for this one. Fixed
gerardfraser
Senior Member
Posts: 3028
Senior Member
Posts: 3028
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:28 PM
Too bad the game has some problems.I think I will wait a few days to buy this one.Thanks for the preliminary review,it helped me out with my decision.
Too bad the game has some problems.I think I will wait a few days to buy this one.Thanks for the preliminary review,it helped me out with my decision.
SeruX
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:30 PM
7870 1155/1387 is pushing this game very well
Texture on High everything else on ultra 1080p 40~60fps
Btw i just download early for tests purpose, already buy 2 key for this game.
7870 1155/1387 is pushing this game very well
Texture on High everything else on ultra 1080p 40~60fps
Btw i just download early for tests purpose, already buy 2 key for this game.
-Tj-
Senior Member
Posts: 16511
Senior Member
Posts: 16511
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:31 PM
Thanks,
btw did you check what's up with pagefile? few confirmed it ran alot better with it off, otherwise it cached to much in pagefile instead of system ram.
Thanks,
btw did you check what's up with pagefile? few confirmed it ran alot better with it off, otherwise it cached to much in pagefile instead of system ram.
Rich_Guy
Senior Member
Posts: 12347
Senior Member
Posts: 12347
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:31 PM
Ubiport strike again
EDIT: Its fixed
Ubiport strike again
EDIT: Its fixed
meth curd
Member
Posts: 92
Member
Posts: 92
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:37 PM
interested to see framerates with the optimized drivers
interested to see framerates with the optimized drivers
pbvider
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Senior Member
Posts: 989
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:38 PM
Well,I guess I have to wait for Maxwell,GTX 880, to play all Ultra on a single card.Thx for the review Hilbert!
Well,I guess I have to wait for Maxwell,GTX 880, to play all Ultra on a single card.Thx for the review Hilbert!
dk_lightning
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:41 PM
So delete my post and not his after pointing out an error? Nice.
...
I am also getting a boat load of stuttering if I have the settings to high. Getting 1700mb+ of used VRAM.
Most any game I have ever played has used.
Aaargh, I used a article design template from an older article for this one. Fixed
So delete my post and not his after pointing out an error? Nice.
...
I am also getting a boat load of stuttering if I have the settings to high. Getting 1700mb+ of used VRAM.
Most any game I have ever played has used.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:43 PM
It is called thread cleaning, the COD error was reported and fixed. You however noticed it as the cache had not yet updated it.
So delete my post and not his after pointing out an error? Nice.
It is called thread cleaning, the COD error was reported and fixed. You however noticed it as the cache had not yet updated it.
dk_lightning
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Senior Member
Posts: 1425
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:44 PM
Fair enough,
But a PM would be nice. I have no problem at all with posts being deleted but a PM to the user in question with a reason would be polite vs nothing and the user left wondering what had happened or what they done.
Fair enough,
But a PM would be nice. I have no problem at all with posts being deleted but a PM to the user in question with a reason would be polite vs nothing and the user left wondering what had happened or what they done.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:48 PM
Thanks,
btw did you check what's up with pagefile? few confirmed it ran alot better with it off, otherwise it cached to much in pagefile instead of system ram.
I have not run into that one at all .. then again the test setup has 16GB RAM so I doubt it would write IO to swap anyway.
But hey, could be very plausible .. as mentioned in the article, I think there will be quite a few patches with this game in the near future.
Thanks,
btw did you check what's up with pagefile? few confirmed it ran alot better with it off, otherwise it cached to much in pagefile instead of system ram.
I have not run into that one at all .. then again the test setup has 16GB RAM so I doubt it would write IO to swap anyway.
But hey, could be very plausible .. as mentioned in the article, I think there will be quite a few patches with this game in the near future.
Hilbert Hagedoorn
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 36843
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:49 PM
I am also getting a boat load of stuttering if I have the settings to high. Getting 1700mb+ of used VRAM.
Most any game I have ever played has used.
Revert to FXAA and set texture quality to high.
I am also getting a boat load of stuttering if I have the settings to high. Getting 1700mb+ of used VRAM.
Most any game I have ever played has used.
Revert to FXAA and set texture quality to high.
Rich_Guy
Senior Member
Posts: 12347
Senior Member
Posts: 12347
Posted on: 05/26/2014 03:50 PM
Be interesting to see the updated AMD results, once their Watchdogs optimized driver is used.
Be interesting to see the updated AMD results, once their Watchdogs optimized driver is used.
Carfax
Senior Member
Posts: 2673
Senior Member
Posts: 2673
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:05 PM
Were the GTX 770 and 680 results switched around by accident?
Were the GTX 770 and 680 results switched around by accident?
Goutan
Senior Member
Posts: 270
Senior Member
Posts: 270
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:13 PM
On page 5 it says that you are using a driver: 338.88 - not sure if this is an error or not, but is this an upcoming driver we can be expecting?
On page 5 it says that you are using a driver: 338.88 - not sure if this is an error or not, but is this an upcoming driver we can be expecting?
INSTG8R
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Senior Member
Posts: 1553
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:14 PM
That's what I am waiting for. I got my key last night so I played a little at 3am and some more today and fiddling around with settings trying to find a nice balance. It is using a whopping 2800MB of VRAM with Textures on Ultra! I had to settle on FXAA to get anything above 30FPS
Be interesting to see the updated AMD results, once their Watchdogs optimized driver is used.
That's what I am waiting for. I got my key last night so I played a little at 3am and some more today and fiddling around with settings trying to find a nice balance. It is using a whopping 2800MB of VRAM with Textures on Ultra! I had to settle on FXAA to get anything above 30FPS
F1refly
Senior Member
Posts: 9042
Senior Member
Posts: 9042
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:18 PM
Ah and the 60fps dream lives on. Master race my.....
Ah and the 60fps dream lives on. Master race my.....
Ryu5uzaku
Senior Member
Posts: 6784
Senior Member
Posts: 6784
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:34 PM
yeah at 2560x1440 780 ti 39 fps and amd got 290x got 40. at uhd 22 fps for ti and 38 for amd. Those amd cards are somehow really under utilized in this title. 290x should by going the res increase push easily 60fps over at 1080p
yeah at 2560x1440 780 ti 39 fps and amd got 290x got 40. at uhd 22 fps for ti and 38 for amd. Those amd cards are somehow really under utilized in this title. 290x should by going the res increase push easily 60fps over at 1080p
peshkohacka
Senior Member
Posts: 110
Senior Member
Posts: 110
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:44 PM
....
....
eclap
Senior Member
Posts: 31497
Senior Member
Posts: 31497
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:48 PM
How can a AAA title have so many problems? I get that Wolfenstein uses GL and very different approach to texture streaming, but Watch Dogs was even demo-ed on E3 running on PCs, how can they delay the game for 9 months and still deliver a sub-par product?
... then again why am i surprised, we're talking Ubisoft here.
6 months.
How can a AAA title have so many problems? I get that Wolfenstein uses GL and very different approach to texture streaming, but Watch Dogs was even demo-ed on E3 running on PCs, how can they delay the game for 9 months and still deliver a sub-par product?
... then again why am i surprised, we're talking Ubisoft here.
6 months.
John Dolan
Senior Member
Posts: 2247
Senior Member
Posts: 2247
Posted on: 05/26/2014 04:59 PM
Just bought this on steam and just installed the new NVidia drivers ready.
Ive been looking forward to this game hope its not too bugged.
Just bought this on steam and just installed the new NVidia drivers ready.
Ive been looking forward to this game hope its not too bugged.
techie405
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Junior Member
Posts: 16
Posted on: 05/26/2014 05:32 PM
Yikes! That vram usage!
Yikes! That vram usage!
fwixgamer
Member
Posts: 21
Member
Posts: 21
Posted on: 05/26/2014 05:58 PM
did u try a test wit a titan and also enabling the super sampling ? i got like 27 fps average in the city with My HD 7950 1220/1600 and all the vram are in use (3020mb) , I'm sure with a titan u ll see something like 4.5 gb of vram in use ore plus who knows
did u try a test wit a titan and also enabling the super sampling ? i got like 27 fps average in the city with My HD 7950 1220/1600 and all the vram are in use (3020mb)
, I'm sure with a titan u ll see something like 4.5 gb of vram in use ore plus who knows
Csokis
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Posted on: 05/26/2014 06:22 PM
Page 5.
R7 290X and R7 295X?
Page 5.
R7 290X and R7 295X?
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 1250
Call of Duty Ghosts VGA graphics card performance benchmarks?
soz couldn't resist