AMD Ryzen 5 5600 review
PowerColor RX 6650 XT Hellhound White review
FSP Hydro PTM Pro (1200W PSU) review
ASUS ROG Radeon RX 6750 XT STRIX review
AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2.0 - preview
Sapphire Radeon RX 6650 XT Nitro+ review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6950 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Pure review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Nitro+ review
MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X TRIO review
MSI Radeon RX 6750 XT Gaming X TRIO review
Watch Dog 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Posted by: on: 11/29/2016 01:33 PM [
103 comment(s) ]
We will look at Watch Dog 2 in a PC graphics performance and PC gamer way. We'll test the game on the PC platform relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.
Read article
Advertisement
pages « < 17 18 19 20 > »
Redemption80
Senior Member
Posts: 18495
Senior Member
Posts: 18495
Posted on: 12/02/2016 09:40 AM
Yep, it wouldn't surprise me if many people would complain less if ultra was removed completely, and high or even medium was renamed to ultra.
Yep, it wouldn't surprise me if many people would complain less if ultra was removed completely, and high or even medium was renamed to ultra.
Loophole35
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Senior Member
Posts: 9800
Posted on: 12/02/2016 02:22 PM
Monchis pretty much wants all games to be 1:1 console ports, thus him and others like him to get close to maxing games on low end hardware.
Forget the people on high end hardware, forget those who will play the game in the future, as making him run on medium makes him sad.
It's the opposite of the elitist who focus on every single issue on a console game, this lot ignore any performance or image quality issues the console version has, and prefer to focus on how bad the PC version is.
No actually he thinks the TXP should be $150 so he can afford it. And since it isn't it must be crap. He sounds like a typical millennial in most of his posts.
Monchis pretty much wants all games to be 1:1 console ports, thus him and others like him to get close to maxing games on low end hardware.
Forget the people on high end hardware, forget those who will play the game in the future, as making him run on medium makes him sad.
It's the opposite of the elitist who focus on every single issue on a console game, this lot ignore any performance or image quality issues the console version has, and prefer to focus on how bad the PC version is.
No actually he thinks the TXP should be $150 so he can afford it. And since it isn't it must be crap. He sounds like a typical millennial in most of his posts.
Monchis
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Senior Member
Posts: 1303
Posted on: 12/02/2016 03:21 PM
You guys are annoying apologists, I have slapped in your faces all the things that make this a mediocre port, at best, and you will still defend it.
You guys are annoying apologists, I have slapped in your faces all the things that make this a mediocre port, at best, and you will still defend it.
Denial
Senior Member
Posts: 13716
Senior Member
Posts: 13716
Posted on: 12/02/2016 03:26 PM
90% of the crap you posted is wrong. You do it in literally every game performance thread - it's getting old. I have friend who plays WD2 on the PC and talks about how great it is. The steam user reviews are all good. People literally comment about how good of a port the game is.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/447040/#app_reviews_hash
6/10 of the posts on the first page comment on how good the performance/graphics are. Hell even Hilbert talked about how good it is.
You're just wrong, get over it.
You guys are annoying apologists, I have slapped in your faces all the things that make this a mediocre port, at best, and you will still defend it.
90% of the crap you posted is wrong. You do it in literally every game performance thread - it's getting old. I have friend who plays WD2 on the PC and talks about how great it is. The steam user reviews are all good. People literally comment about how good of a port the game is.
http://store.steampowered.com/app/447040/#app_reviews_hash
A huge improvement on the first game and Ubisoft seems to have learned a thing or two about proper optimization this time around. Its the best open world game I've played in recent memory.
Playing on ultra settings with a gtx 1080 on a 3440x1440 21:9 monitor seeing 50-60 fps most of the time.
Playing on ultra settings with a gtx 1080 on a 3440x1440 21:9 monitor seeing 50-60 fps most of the time.
Ubisoft didn't lie about this one.... fair optimized, good graphics and better gameplay!! 11/10 would recommend it
4.) Animations, sounds, graphics are all great, technically its wonderful.
Graphics for an open-world game? The best so far.
Performance Runs pretty smoothly in my config without any fps drops
6/10 of the posts on the first page comment on how good the performance/graphics are. Hell even Hilbert talked about how good it is.
You're just wrong, get over it.
pages « < 17 18 19 20 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 7975
Monchis pretty much wants all games to be 1:1 console ports, thus him and others like him to get close to maxing games on low end hardware.
Forget the people on high end hardware, forget those who will play the game in the future, as making him run on medium makes him sad.
It's the opposite of the elitist who focus on every single issue on a console game, this lot ignore any performance or image quality issues the console version has, and prefer to focus on how bad the PC version is.
Isn't "maxing" just a word from a point on? You can get a game like Watch_Dogs 2, rename medium to "Ultra", and that's it. You run "Ultra". Complaints like his come either from PCMasterRace crap, or experience with games from an era that the PC was the only real target.