Samsung T7 Shield Portable 1TB USB SSD review
DeepCool LS720 (LCS) review
Fractal Design Pop Air RGB Black TG review
Palit GeForce GTX 1630 4GB Dual review
FSP Dagger Pro (850W PSU) review
Razer Leviathan V2 gaming soundbar review
Guru3D NVMe Thermal Test - the heatsink vs. performance
EnGenius ECW220S 2x2 Cloud Access Point review
Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora HPE 360 LCS cooler review
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler Review
Unigine Superposition performance benchmarks
Posted by: on: 04/11/2017 07:41 PM [
60 comment(s) ]
Unigine, known from their 3D engine and benchmarks like heaven and valley have released a new benchmark, Superposition. The software allows you to test their game engine and outputs scores and frame-rates for you to compare to.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
unigine,
uningine superposition performance
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Bogeyx
Member
Posts: 70
Member
Posts: 70
Posted on: 04/11/2017 08:48 PM
My two cents:
1080 med: 14094
1080 extreme: 3839
8K: 2738
Looks quite ok on med and performance is good.
But extreme is only slightly better and performance is much worse.
All in all not bad, but compared to unreal, frostbyte and co nothing that special
(nice lighting thouh)
My two cents:
1080 med: 14094
1080 extreme: 3839
8K: 2738
Looks quite ok on med and performance is good.
But extreme is only slightly better and performance is much worse.
All in all not bad, but compared to unreal, frostbyte and co nothing that special
(nice lighting thouh)
Robbo9999
Senior Member
Posts: 1622
Senior Member
Posts: 1622
Posted on: 04/11/2017 09:37 PM
Well, this benchmark was touted as being photo-realistic on their website, I'd say it's a long way from photo-realistic!
Here are the results on my rig (online comparison feature not working yet, praps not enough results collected yet):
1080p Extreme: 3858
1080p High: 10039
Surprised I beat (or equalled) Bogeyx's 2100Mhz GTX 1070 above - mind you I described my GTX 1070 as 2062Mhz in my sig, but really it stabalises at 2012-2025Mhz in that benchmark with auto fan settings.
Well, this benchmark was touted as being photo-realistic on their website, I'd say it's a long way from photo-realistic!
Here are the results on my rig (online comparison feature not working yet, praps not enough results collected yet):
1080p Extreme: 3858
1080p High: 10039
Surprised I beat (or equalled) Bogeyx's 2100Mhz GTX 1070 above - mind you I described my GTX 1070 as 2062Mhz in my sig, but really it stabalises at 2012-2025Mhz in that benchmark with auto fan settings.
vestibule
Senior Member
Posts: 725
Senior Member
Posts: 725
Posted on: 04/11/2017 09:41 PM
Boy Oh Boy does this app demon straight the diminishing returns in game eye candy.
Actual artwork is never gonna give us what we want and neither is infinity triangles.
Boy Oh Boy does this app demon straight the diminishing returns in game eye candy.
Actual artwork is never gonna give us what we want and neither is infinity triangles.
Silva
Senior Member
Posts: 1788
Senior Member
Posts: 1788
Posted on: 04/11/2017 09:52 PM
I could only do 1080p Medium because of VDRAM limitations.
4515 Score
FPS: min 27.38, avg 33.78, max 42.61
GPU was always at 100% and CPU barely hit 40%. I really need to upgrade ahahah.
On another note, it's really disappointing not having DX12 or Vulcan: it's a missed opportunity.
I could only do 1080p Medium because of VDRAM limitations.
4515 Score
FPS: min 27.38, avg 33.78, max 42.61
GPU was always at 100% and CPU barely hit 40%. I really need to upgrade ahahah.
On another note, it's really disappointing not having DX12 or Vulcan: it's a missed opportunity.
pages 1 2 3 4 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Don Vito Corleone
Posts: 44105
Sorry I asked before reading the article.
Yes it is disappointing.
Thanks again.
PS: It would help much Hilbert if you note the boost clock of each card in the results section. So that we can make some rough assumptions about individual factory overclocked cards.
Like I see in your results the gtx 1080, but my 1080 xtreme boosts normally to 2036.
All cards in the benchmarks are always reference with the corresponding boost modes (unless noted otherwise). The video however was a last minute thing I did on an AIB card.