Guru3D.com
  • HOME
  • NEWS
    • Channels
    • Archive
  • DOWNLOADS
    • New Downloads
    • Categories
    • Archive
  • GAME REVIEWS
  • ARTICLES
    • Rig of the Month
    • Join ROTM
    • PC Buyers Guide
    • Guru3D VGA Charts
    • Editorials
    • Dated content
  • HARDWARE REVIEWS
    • Videocards
    • Processors
    • Audio
    • Motherboards
    • Memory and Flash
    • SSD Storage
    • Chassis
    • Media Players
    • Power Supply
    • Laptop and Mobile
    • Smartphone
    • Networking
    • Keyboard Mouse
    • Cooling
    • Search articles
    • Knowledgebase
    • More Categories
  • FORUMS
  • NEWSLETTER
  • CONTACT

New Reviews
Cougar Terminator gaming chair review
G.Skill TridentZ5 RGB DDR5 7200 CL34 2x16 GB review
ASUS TUF Gaming B760-PLUS WIFI D4 review
Netac NV7000 2 TB NVMe SSD Review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4080 Noctua OC Edition review
MSI Clutch GM51 Wireless mouse review
ASUS ROG STRIX B760-F Gaming WIFI review
Asus ROG Harpe Ace Aim Lab Edition mouse review
SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Headset review
Ryzen 7800X3D preview - 7950X3D One CCD Disabled

New Downloads
HWiNFO Download v7.42
Intel ARC graphics Driver Download Version: 31.0.101.4257
CrystalDiskInfo 9.0.0 Beta4 Download
AIDA64 Download Version 6.88
GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver download
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.2 WHQL download
GeForce 531.29 WHQL driver download
AMD Ryzen Master Utility Download 2.10.2.2367
AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 23.3.1 WHQL download
Display Driver Uninstaller Download version 18.0.6.1


New Forum Topics
NVIDIA's Upcoming RTX 4070 Graphics Card to Cost $599 FSR Thread Intel LGA 7529 Processors are Nearly 10cm in Length NVIDIA GeForce 531.41 WHQL driver Download & Discussion JONSBO Announces DS8 Sub-LCD Series with High Resolution and Versatility in Black and White RTX 4080 Owner's Thread Windows 12 - News, rumors, info, etc. The Last of Us Part I PC Port Receives 77% negative ratings on Steam, due to poor optimization Latest threats, vulnerabilities, exploits to be aware of UL Benchmarks Launches 3DMark Update with Feature Test for AMD FidelityFX Super Resolution 2




Guru3D.com » Review » The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

Posted by: Hilbert Hagedoorn on: 03/15/2019 01:03 PM [ 86 comment(s) ]

We take a look at The Division 2 (2019) in our usual in-depth ways. That would be tested on the PC gaming wise relative towards graphics card performance with the latest AMD/NVIDIA graphics card drivers. Multiple graphics cards are being tested and benchmarked. We have a look at performance with the newest graphics cards and technologies.

Read article


Advertisement



« Corsair Carbide 678C review · The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review · Synology DS1019+ Gigabit NAS Review »

pages « < 14 15 16 17 > »

Denial
Senior Member



Posts: 14046
Posted on: 03/18/2019 02:50 PM
True. I remember when the 2080 came out, the initial reviews had the 1080ti up in many games. Now, you see the 2080 beat the 1080ti pretty much everywhere.

That's not necessarily a bad thing. The 2080 was always going to gain some more performance with new drivers, there was still some optimisation to do. And I don't blame Nvidia for focusing on the new generation of cards. The 1080ti performs as ever, it doesn't get worse. What we see is the new cards improve.

I'm ok with that, I don't keep my cards longer than 18 months in general.

I don't know what reviews you were looking at. Guru3D's 2080 review the 2080 was faster in ~80% of games at various resolutions (sometimes significantly) - TPU's overall average has the 2080 up by 8%. That's not to say that drivers haven't/won't increase 2080 performance further - just that the 2080 was always on average faster than 1080Ti.

because sly Huang stopped optimizing gtx 1080Ti properly in old games, including dx12 gtx 1080Ti faster 2080
buying cards nvidia you get a subscription for 2 years for your money and optimize drivers

The person you're quoting is saying Vega VII is same/faster in D2 and you're saying its because Nvidia stops optimizing drivers in old games. D2 is brand new game. Vega VII was ~5% slower at launch (average) than a 1080Ti. Is it really so hard to believe that Division 2, optimized by AMD, manages to recoup that 5% loss? not that Nvidia is purposely gimping it's older cards?

Why do people immediately rush to conspiracy?

TestDriver
Senior Member



Posts: 124
Posted on: 03/18/2019 04:07 PM
Finally a game that makes me want to upgrade my very aging 3570k, getting subpar performance with my GPU compared to this article.

Looking forward to the Ryzen 3000 series, then I will finally upgrade :)

circeseye
Senior Member



Posts: 273
Posted on: 03/18/2019 06:07 PM
im on a amd 8350 with a rx590...1440p res high settings dx12 and it doesnt drop below 60fps (vsync is on)

TestDriver
Senior Member



Posts: 124
Posted on: 03/18/2019 06:50 PM
I'm getting 75fps in the benchmark at 1080p@ultra.

But have seen in tests that this game loves more cores, so could be that your 8 core really makes the difference

But this is the first game I have tested that you really see that my cpu in not up to par, in other games the difference isn't that big.

nizzen
Senior Member



Posts: 2322
Posted on: 03/19/2019 12:58 PM
When the system isn't gpubound, there is more difference in performance between cpu's :

The game is allso more cpubound ingame vs the "static" benchmark.

https://www.pcgamer.com/the-division-2-settings-system-requirements-and-performance/

pages « < 14 15 16 17 > »

Post New Comment
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.

Guru3D.com » Articles » The Division 2: PC graphics performance benchmark review 5

Guru3D.com © 2023