EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra review
Corsair 5000D PC Chassis Review
NZXT Kraken X63 RGB Review
ASUS Radeon RX 6900 XT STRIX OC LC Review
TerraMaster F5-221 NAS Review
MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X TRIO Review
Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 NITRO+ review
Corsair HS70 Bluetooth Headset Review
MSI MEG X570 Unify review
Scythe Ninja 5 air cooler review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Posted by: on: 06/11/2019 12:19 AM [
199 comment(s) ]
AMD just has announced its Radeon 5700 series graphics cards. The NAVI based product are fabbed at 7nm, get GDDR6 memory and for the bigger part is based on a new architecture called rDNA. In this early preview article, we’ll share details and about the technology and specifications. This by no means is a review, the launch you may expect in early July.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
radeon rx vega,
amd
pages « < 37 38 39 40
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 9939
Senior Member
Posts: 9939
Posted on: 06/20/2019 06:13 AM
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11325
Senior Member
Posts: 11325
Posted on: 06/20/2019 07:00 AM
Exactly. As nVidia got Ageia. But since then they have stranglehold of proprietary tech. And no reason to react. Same way as intel has no big reason to react.
If people want Nvidia to react, they'll have to stop buying their products. (Does not mean that they have to buy AMD's either.)
People had chance to say no to Turing pricing. Their choice, consequences for everyone.
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Exactly. As nVidia got Ageia. But since then they have stranglehold of proprietary tech. And no reason to react. Same way as intel has no big reason to react.
If people want Nvidia to react, they'll have to stop buying their products. (Does not mean that they have to buy AMD's either.)
People had chance to say no to Turing pricing. Their choice, consequences for everyone.
airbud7
Senior Member
Posts: 7835
Senior Member
Posts: 7835
Posted on: 06/20/2019 01:25 PM
yep^ funny how soon we forget....
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
yep^ funny how soon we forget....
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13268
Senior Member
Posts: 13268
Posted on: 06/21/2019 03:03 AM
soon? launched in June 2008
was over a decade ago
amd happened to be better for "3dbenching" then intel was at that time too.
its all just price placement now price it on how fast it is compared to the other guy,both seem to care about the bottom line of coarse so higher the better
yep^ funny how soon we forget....
soon? launched in June 2008
was over a decade ago
amd happened to be better for "3dbenching" then intel was at that time too.
its all just price placement now price it on how fast it is compared to the other guy,both seem to care about the bottom line of coarse so higher the better
pages « < 37 38 39 40
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 11325
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?