TerraMaster F5-422 NAS Review
Radeon RX 6600 (Sapphire Pulse) review
Radeon RX 6600 (Gigabyte Eagle 8G) review
PowerColor Radeon RX 6900 XT Red Devil review
Corsair Sabre RGB Pro Wireless mouse review
Far Cry 6: PC graphics performance benchmark review
Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 Bilibili 12G review
ACER Predator GM7000 2TB NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD review
be quiet! Shadow Rock SLIM 2 review
Asrock B550 PG Riptide review
Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT
Posted by: on: 06/11/2019 01:19 AM [
196 comment(s) ]
AMD just has announced its Radeon 5700 series graphics cards. The NAVI based product are fabbed at 7nm, get GDDR6 memory and for the bigger part is based on a new architecture called rDNA. In this early preview article, we’ll share details and about the technology and specifications. This by no means is a review, the launch you may expect in early July.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
radeon rx vega,
amd
pages « < 37 38 39 40
cowie
Senior Member
Posts: 13273
Senior Member
Posts: 13273
Posted on: 06/20/2019 04:41 AM
I like navi already
rumored price "fixing"
super cards what ever they are
getting better I think
I like navi already
rumored price "fixing"
super cards what ever they are
getting better I think
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Posted on: 06/20/2019 06:39 AM
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
AMD made a huge mistake with this launch. They should have shown the RX 5700XT at 349, and the RX 5700 at 299. They just got too greedy. They do not have the mindshare to pull off selling these at their current launch prices. An aftermarket 5700XT is going to end up costing 500 US. People will just not buy them. They should have used common sense here. The RTX cards have sold poorly, due to their rip off prices. AMD has no mindshare in the GPU market, yet they try and go full blast in pricing by charging 450 US for a stock 5700 XT. It is just another overpriced midrange card, just like the RTX 2070 is. Prices from both sides is appalling, and this garbage pricing across all skus needs to stop.
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
alanm
Senior Member
Posts: 10540
Senior Member
Posts: 10540
Posted on: 06/20/2019 07:13 AM
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Show me historically when was it last time AMD gained market share by undercutting nVidia. 3 years ago AMD launched Polaris. I do not see any great improvement in their market share since then.
Having faster product at lower price did not work... Doing same thing and expecting different results...
Who do you have them for?
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Senior Member
Posts: 11809
Posted on: 06/20/2019 08:00 AM
Exactly. As nVidia got Ageia. But since then they have stranglehold of proprietary tech. And no reason to react. Same way as intel has no big reason to react.
If people want Nvidia to react, they'll have to stop buying their products. (Does not mean that they have to buy AMD's either.)
People had chance to say no to Turing pricing. Their choice, consequences for everyone.
Its been a long time, but HD4850 ($199) and 4870 ($299) back in 2008 certainly helped them get a bump in market share. These cards arrived only within a month of Nvidias expensive GTX 280 and 260 cards that were priced at $650 and $450. Nvidia had to re-adjust their pricing as a result.
Exactly. As nVidia got Ageia. But since then they have stranglehold of proprietary tech. And no reason to react. Same way as intel has no big reason to react.
If people want Nvidia to react, they'll have to stop buying their products. (Does not mean that they have to buy AMD's either.)
People had chance to say no to Turing pricing. Their choice, consequences for everyone.
pages « < 37 38 39 40
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 423
Still playing the catching up , I hope the they will bring something exciting out in my lifetime , it has been bit underwhelming in the graphics cards industry lately .