Corsair K57 RGB Wireless keyboard review
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X review
PowerColor 5700 RED DEVIL review
MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke review
ASUS Radeon RX 5700 XT ROG STRIX review
ViewSonic Elite XG240R Monitor Review
Promo: URCDKey Summer Sale Windows 10 Pro for $11
X570 Aorus master review
Cooler Master Silencio S600 review
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G review
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
Posted by: on: 06/11/2019 01:19 AM [
93 comment(s) ]
AMD during its E3 keynote released more details Ryzen 3000. You might have watched the live-stream, well that or you were asleep as that was nighttime in the EU, but in this preview article a deeper overview of what to expect Ryzen 3000 aka Zen2 wise including architecture details.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
radeon rx vega,
amd
pages 1 2 3 4
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9515
Senior Member
Posts: 9515
Posted on: 06/12/2019 09:06 PM
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanboys with 3PFS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with BETTER PERFORMANCE, BETTER PRICE, MORE EFFICIENT AND MORE SECURITY!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
Mate, do us all favor and stop using CAPS for entire sentences. I understand that you want to highlight something. But when you write that limited amount of text, there is really no need.
Especially since we have actual formatting tools for underlining/bolding of text.
Your post may be pure love, but it annoys the hell even out of me.
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanaticism fanboys with 5FPS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with better performance, better price, better efficient and more security!
The new absurd of the blue side fanboys now is that you dont need more cores to game... LOL... no dude... I wanna more with better price! Do you really learned something at this forum?!?!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
I see you fixed it. Thanks, much better.
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanboys with 3PFS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with BETTER PERFORMANCE, BETTER PRICE, MORE EFFICIENT AND MORE SECURITY!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
Mate, do us all favor and stop using CAPS for entire sentences. I understand that you want to highlight something. But when you write that limited amount of text, there is really no need.
Especially since we have actual formatting tools for underlining/bolding of text.
Your post may be pure love, but it annoys the hell even out of me.
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanaticism fanboys with 5FPS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with better performance, better price, better efficient and more security!
The new absurd of the blue side fanboys now is that you dont need more cores to game... LOL... no dude... I wanna more with better price! Do you really learned something at this forum?!?!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
I see you fixed it. Thanks, much better.
vbetts
Posts: 14525
Posts: 14525
Posted on: 06/12/2019 09:16 PM
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanaticism fanboys with 5FPS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with better performance, better price, better efficient and more security!
The new absurd of the blue side fanboys now is that you dont need more cores to game... LOL... no dude... I wanna more with better price! Do you really learned something at this forum?!?!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
Number one, caps.
Number two, troll posts will get you no where. Please refrain from posting this in the future.
And also anyone else, don't reply to it.
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanaticism fanboys with 5FPS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with better performance, better price, better efficient and more security!
The new absurd of the blue side fanboys now is that you dont need more cores to game... LOL... no dude... I wanna more with better price! Do you really learned something at this forum?!?!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!
Number one, caps.
Number two, troll posts will get you no where. Please refrain from posting this in the future.
And also anyone else, don't reply to it.
Borys
Member
Posts: 67
Member
Posts: 67
Posted on: 06/12/2019 11:38 PM
Sorry dude!
Like you... I hate the all time Intel fanboys saying the same bullshit and now with God thanks AMD has a better cpu... so, the post was highlight to troll them.
I will try to control myself... lol. Sorry again!
Number one, caps.
Number two, troll posts will get you no where. Please refrain from posting this in the future.
And also anyone else, don't reply to it.
Sorry man... but where is the troll of my message? I did tell something wrong?
Sorry dude!
Like you... I hate the all time Intel fanboys saying the same bullshit and now with God thanks AMD has a better cpu... so, the post was highlight to troll them.
I will try to control myself... lol. Sorry again!
Number one, caps.
Number two, troll posts will get you no where. Please refrain from posting this in the future.
And also anyone else, don't reply to it.
Sorry man... but where is the troll of my message? I did tell something wrong?
Arbie
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Posted on: 06/13/2019 03:57 AM
It's telling that for 10 years the best CPU I could afford from Intel was a quad-core - and I paid a lot for those. Now AMD doesn't even bother to mention a quad in their Ryzen 3000 line.
It's telling that for 10 years the best CPU I could afford from Intel was a quad-core - and I paid a lot for those. Now AMD doesn't even bother to mention a quad in their Ryzen 3000 line.
fry178
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Senior Member
Posts: 1061
Posted on: 06/13/2019 05:11 AM
@karma777police
next to impossible, means it IS possible
look at the chance of core meltdown: 1 even in 1 BILLION years
yet first one happened after not even 40y of having nuclear power plants.
im talking about the fact that amd doesnt have issues, where intel does.
and without amd you would still pay +300$ for a quad core with 10% perf increase of prev gen.
the same way "you" can do a cheap upgrade, so can amd owners, no difference there, except, if i do more than gaming with a +800 pc (as a complete i7/i9 setup will clearly cost),
intel isnt anywhere close in performance.
and as soon as you go away from ppl like in this forum to the guy walking into a shop to buy a sub 1000$ pc, intel is definitely not the choice anymore (from some exceptions proving the rule)
@karma777police
next to impossible, means it IS possible
look at the chance of core meltdown: 1 even in 1 BILLION years
yet first one happened after not even 40y of having nuclear power plants.
im talking about the fact that amd doesnt have issues, where intel does.
and without amd you would still pay +300$ for a quad core with 10% perf increase of prev gen.
the same way "you" can do a cheap upgrade, so can amd owners, no difference there, except, if i do more than gaming with a +800 pc (as a complete i7/i9 setup will clearly cost),
intel isnt anywhere close in performance.
and as soon as you go away from ppl like in this forum to the guy walking into a shop to buy a sub 1000$ pc, intel is definitely not the choice anymore (from some exceptions proving the rule)
vbetts
Posts: 14525
Posts: 14525
Posted on: 06/13/2019 06:21 AM
Sorry dude!
Like you... I hate the all time Intel fanboys saying the same bullshit and now with God thanks AMD has a better cpu... so, the post was highlight to troll them.
I will try to control myself... lol. Sorry again!
Sorry man... but where is the troll of my message? I did tell something wrong?
Members here did not do that, most of us here are very open.
But I take that post as baiting, if you have any questions on that feel free to PM me instead of adding on to this topic and your post count.
Sorry dude!
Like you... I hate the all time Intel fanboys saying the same bullshit and now with God thanks AMD has a better cpu... so, the post was highlight to troll them.
I will try to control myself... lol. Sorry again!
Sorry man... but where is the troll of my message? I did tell something wrong?
Members here did not do that, most of us here are very open.
But I take that post as baiting, if you have any questions on that feel free to PM me instead of adding on to this topic and your post count.
karma777police
Member
Posts: 73
Member
Posts: 73
Posted on: 06/13/2019 02:18 PM
@karma777police
next to impossible, means it IS possible
look at the chance of core meltdown: 1 even in 1 BILLION years
yet first one happened after not even 40y of having nuclear power plants.
im talking about the fact that amd doesnt have issues, where intel does.
and without amd you would still pay +300$ for a quad core with 10% perf increase of prev gen.
the same way "you" can do a cheap upgrade, so can amd owners, no difference there, except, if i do more than gaming with a +800 pc (as a complete i7/i9 setup will clearly cost),
intel isnt anywhere close in performance.
and as soon as you go away from ppl like in this forum to the guy walking into a shop to buy a sub 1000$ pc, intel is definitely not the choice anymore (from some exceptions proving the rule)
I do not care, I even disabled spectre and other patches. I agree without AMD we would not have competition and I am glad so I can continue going with Intel CPU for the lower price.
@karma777police
next to impossible, means it IS possible
look at the chance of core meltdown: 1 even in 1 BILLION years
yet first one happened after not even 40y of having nuclear power plants.
im talking about the fact that amd doesnt have issues, where intel does.
and without amd you would still pay +300$ for a quad core with 10% perf increase of prev gen.
the same way "you" can do a cheap upgrade, so can amd owners, no difference there, except, if i do more than gaming with a +800 pc (as a complete i7/i9 setup will clearly cost),
intel isnt anywhere close in performance.
and as soon as you go away from ppl like in this forum to the guy walking into a shop to buy a sub 1000$ pc, intel is definitely not the choice anymore (from some exceptions proving the rule)
I do not care, I even disabled spectre and other patches. I agree without AMD we would not have competition and I am glad so I can continue going with Intel CPU for the lower price.
fantaskarsef
Senior Member
Posts: 10586
Senior Member
Posts: 10586
Posted on: 06/13/2019 04:09 PM
Thanks for the laugh.
I do not care, I even disabled spectre and other patches. I agree without AMD we would not have competition and I am glad so I can continue going with Intel CPU for the lower price.
Thanks for the laugh.
H1TMANza
Member
Posts: 38
Member
Posts: 38
Posted on: 06/14/2019 01:55 PM
Is there an NDA for early reviews or do we all have to wait for the 7th till they released ?
Is there an NDA for early reviews or do we all have to wait for the 7th till they released ?
sverek
Member
Posts: 5171
Member
Posts: 5171
Posted on: 06/14/2019 03:44 PM
7th July for legit reviews. Before that only leaks and unconfirmed benchmarks.
Is there an NDA for early reviews or do we all have to wait for the 7th till they released ?
7th July for legit reviews. Before that only leaks and unconfirmed benchmarks.
Arbie
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Senior Member
Posts: 169
Posted on: 06/15/2019 04:30 AM
I'll settle for unconfirmed leaks. Anything...
7th July for legit reviews. Before that only leaks and unconfirmed benchmarks.
I'll settle for unconfirmed leaks. Anything...
sverek
Senior Member
Posts: 5171
Senior Member
Posts: 5171
Posted on: 06/15/2019 09:19 AM
5GHz is not happening.
Source: me.
I'll settle for unconfirmed leaks. Anything...
5GHz is not happening.
Source: me.
devastator
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Senior Member
Posts: 106
Posted on: 06/15/2019 10:54 PM
https://wccftech.com/intel-10nm-ice-lake-sunny-cove-14nm-comet-lake-amd-ryzen-3000-cpu-z-benchmark-leak/ is this fake???
https://wccftech.com/intel-10nm-ice-lake-sunny-cove-14nm-comet-lake-amd-ryzen-3000-cpu-z-benchmark-leak/ is this fake???
Aura89
Senior Member
Posts: 7561
Senior Member
Posts: 7561
Posted on: 06/15/2019 11:07 PM
It'd be nice if intel actually improved their architecture for once in the last 5-6 years, but even if it is true, it's not coming to desktop for a couple years yet.
https://wccftech.com/intel-10nm-ice-lake-sunny-cove-14nm-comet-lake-amd-ryzen-3000-cpu-z-benchmark-leak/ is this fake???
It'd be nice if intel actually improved their architecture for once in the last 5-6 years, but even if it is true, it's not coming to desktop for a couple years yet.
Fox2232
Senior Member
Posts: 9515
Senior Member
Posts: 9515
Posted on: 06/16/2019 08:38 AM
*May not reflect all publicly available security updates*
- means that chip is still in need of some
- means that results are to be adjusted for all those people who actually have them applied since they do not mess with system patches
- Very likely uses DDR5 and they stated that configurations differ (higher memory clock/bandwidth?)
I could bet that they tested "older" chip with memory running at supported frequency. Which even for i9-9900K is 2666MHz.
It'd be nice if intel actually improved their architecture for once in the last 5-6 years, but even if it is true, it's not coming to desktop for a couple years yet.
*May not reflect all publicly available security updates*
- means that chip is still in need of some
- means that results are to be adjusted for all those people who actually have them applied since they do not mess with system patches
- Very likely uses DDR5 and they stated that configurations differ (higher memory clock/bandwidth?)
I could bet that they tested "older" chip with memory running at supported frequency. Which even for i9-9900K is 2666MHz.
Dazz
Senior Member
Posts: 801
Senior Member
Posts: 801
Posted on: 06/16/2019 12:24 PM
https://wccftech.com/intel-10nm-ice-lake-sunny-cove-14nm-comet-lake-amd-ryzen-3000-cpu-z-benchmark-leak/ is this fake???
Looks pretty fake to me, slide says 18% IPC improvement but then they say it's faster than a 9700K at 5.3GHz which is 43% typically when they announce a specific IPC increase that's the best case scenario although instructions like AVX could improve by that much. Although it's not due to late 2020 thus i would be surprised if they have a working sample let alone CPU-Z even detecting what the hell it is besides the CPU string. Then theres the Ryzen 3xxx CPU's which have higher clock speeds than their max turbo.
HWgeek
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Senior Member
Posts: 439
Posted on: 06/16/2019 01:17 PM
First Gen Ryzen is supported on Gigabyte's X570 board
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570-AORUS-MASTER-rev-10#support-cpu
First Gen Ryzen is supported on Gigabyte's X570 board
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/X570-AORUS-MASTER-rev-10#support-cpu
pages 1 2 3 4
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Member
Posts: 67
The Ryzen 3XXX will put INTEL DOWN!
Let the fanaticism fanboys with 5FPS more in some games (really little titles) and the smart people with better performance, better price, better efficient and more security!
The new absurd of the blue side fanboys now is that you dont need more cores to game... LOL... no dude... I wanna more with better price! Do you really learned something at this forum?!?!
CONGRATULATIONS AMD! THE NEW KING CPU!