Intel NUC 13 Pro (Arena Canyon) review
Endorfy Arx 700 Air chassis review
Beelink SER5 Pro (Ryzen 7 5800H) mini PC review
Crucial T700 PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSD Review - 12GB/s
Sapphire Radeon RX 7600 PULSE review
Gainward GeForce RTX 4060 Ti GHOST review
Radeon RX 7600 review
ASUS GeForce RTX 4060 Ti TUF Gaming review
MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Gaming X TRIO review
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8GB (FE) review
Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2





AMD during its E3 keynote released more details Ryzen 3000. You might have watched the live-stream, well that or you were asleep as that was nighttime in the EU, but in this preview article a deeper overview of what to expect Ryzen 3000 aka Zen2 wise including architecture details.
Read article
Advertisement
Tagged as:
radeon rx vega,
amd
« Team Group Vulcan Z DDR4 3200 MHz 2x 8GB review · Tech preview: AMD Ryzen 3000 - 7nm ZEN2
· Tech preview: Radeon RX 5700 and 5700 XT »
pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
nevcairiel
Senior Member
Posts: 853
Senior Member
Posts: 853
Posted on: 06/11/2019 10:36 AM
Hilbert, can you do some tests with higher-capacity memory setups for the Ryzen 3000 review? I would love to know what 24/7 memory clocks I can run with 64GB installed, so 4 Dual Rank modules, for example. The best modules to buy in that config seem to be the G.SKILL 3733 CL17 4x16GB kits, but i'm not sure if that isn't a waste if Ryzen 3000 can't actually run them properly.
Everyone seems to otherwise focus on pure "gaming memory" setups, 2 sticks of single rank memory for max speed, and not capacity.
Hilbert, can you do some tests with higher-capacity memory setups for the Ryzen 3000 review? I would love to know what 24/7 memory clocks I can run with 64GB installed, so 4 Dual Rank modules, for example. The best modules to buy in that config seem to be the G.SKILL 3733 CL17 4x16GB kits, but i'm not sure if that isn't a waste if Ryzen 3000 can't actually run them properly.
Everyone seems to otherwise focus on pure "gaming memory" setups, 2 sticks of single rank memory for max speed, and not capacity.
djeiraji
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Junior Member
Posts: 8
Posted on: 06/11/2019 10:56 AM
Impressed.
That's one of the most exciting change in mainstream CPU history.
All of that with backward motherboard compatibility.
GG AMD.
Impressed.
That's one of the most exciting change in mainstream CPU history.
All of that with backward motherboard compatibility.
GG AMD.
StefanInter9
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Junior Member
Posts: 9
Posted on: 06/11/2019 11:19 AM
Was going to go for 12core, may now save up a bit more and go 16core instead. Exciting times.
Was going to go for 12core, may now save up a bit more and go 16core instead. Exciting times.
nevcairiel
Senior Member
Posts: 853
Senior Member
Posts: 853
Posted on: 06/11/2019 11:39 AM
Impressed.
That's one of the most exciting change in mainstream CPU history.
All of that with backward motherboard compatibility.
GG AMD.
They are actually compromising on some things to keep compatibility though. Not sure I'm a fan of that. Rather see them give it all it could have, but oh well.
Impressed.
That's one of the most exciting change in mainstream CPU history.
All of that with backward motherboard compatibility.
GG AMD.
They are actually compromising on some things to keep compatibility though. Not sure I'm a fan of that. Rather see them give it all it could have, but oh well.
pages « 3 4 5 6 > »
Click here to post a comment for this article on the message forum.
Senior Member
Posts: 441
Wow so now PBO can also raise the maximum frequency.
Also interesting that the X570 chipset is a 14nm version of the 12nm IO die on the cpu.
Yes, I knew it! LOL.
looks like even the cheap 3600 can match 9900K ST with the new PBO: